Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Gardner-Webb

BSth · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 364 · Raw net -29.0 · Tempo 70.8 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-06

All seasons
Record
2–28
2 wins
AdjNet
-23.6β
rank 363 of 365
AdjO
96.2β
rank 356 of 365
AdjD
119.8β
rank 359 of 365
AdjT
70.2β
SOS
1.3β
rank 125 of 363
NCSOS
5.7β
WAB
-20.3β
rank 358 of 363
RR
-0.3β
Exp. W
2.3β

Scouting Report

CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.93.5360122.4361108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%47.831756.935651.4
TO / 100 poss.19.834415.326416.7
Offensive rebound %23.235036.635530.6
FTA / FGA %30.330235.218535.0
Shooting
3P%31.031936.029933.9
2P%48.629559.036051.7
FT%68.531372.619272.5
Style
3PA / FGA %39.841.039.5
Assists / FGM %41.055.352.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %6.810.59.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %31.931.731.4
2-pointers %50.349.948.8
Free throws %17.818.319.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
10.0
Top Three Share of Minutes
37%
Bench Share of Minutes
39%
Players with Logged Minutes
16

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03MinnesotaL 60–8772.0Away0–1
11-07ClemsonL 59–9769.9Away0–2
11-15ElonL 84–9575.5Away0–3
11-18DePaulL 62–9379.4Away0–4
11-22RichmondL 67–10274.9Away0–5
11-26NavyL 51–8466.6Neutral0–6
11-28Southeastern La.L 68–7671.5Neutral0–7
11-29UNCWL 62–8869.2Away0–8
12-03Queens (NC)L 74–10773.3Away0–9
12-06Ga. SouthernL 84–8874.8Home0–10
12-15WoffordL 57–8369.3Home0–11
12-21TennesseeL 52–9470.0Away0–12
12-31Charleston So.L 79–8973.7Home0–13
01-03WinthropL 77–8867.6Away0–14
01-07High PointL 49–10479.6Away0–15
01-14RadfordL 80–8970.6Home0–16
01-17PresbyterianL 55–9270.0Home0–17
01-21LongwoodL 56–9169.9Away0–18
01-23USC UpstateW 67–6566.3Home1–18
01-29UNC AshevilleL 50–6959.7Away1–19
02-04LongwoodL 66–8671.0Home1–20
02-07PresbyterianL 62–6863.3Away1–21
02-12WinthropL 85–10376.7Home1–22
02-14High PointL 87–11278.1Home1–23
02-17Charleston So.L 66–7574.4Away1–24
02-19RadfordL 70–8269.0Away1–25
02-26UNC AshevilleL 71–7762.0Home1–26
02-28USC UpstateL 61–7170.3Away1–27
03-04USC UpstateW 65–6464.6Neutral2–27
03-06High PointL 59–8170.3Neutral2–28

Roster · 16 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

MinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Colin Hawkins2827:1363.5%7.81.92.01.00.02.21.977–16845.8%9–4022.5%†36–6159.0%43.5%46.2%29.3%523:55 −3:1859.8%5.2 −2.5
Jacob Hogarth3025:0062.5%10.26.71.40.70.62.52.6105–20750.7%6–1540.0%†78–11070.9%51.4%56.6%49.5%529:10 +4:1072.9%8.6 −1.6
Ace Talbert2925:1360.9%6.71.91.31.00.00.92.231–6250.0%35–13226.5%27–4362.8%43.0%45.6%22.2%526:48 +1:3567.0%7.0 +0.3
Spence Sims2924:3959.6%9.71.80.80.40.01.61.832–7045.7%65–15242.8%23–3174.2%58.3%59.8%14.0%522:25 −2:1456.1%9.0 −0.7
Jacob Hudson2627:0358.6%10.63.81.51.30.41.71.091–17352.6%11–4822.9%†61–9464.9%48.6%52.6%42.5%534:27 +7:2486.1%15.0 +4.4
Jamias Ferere3017:2943.7%6.53.00.70.40.21.31.461–13345.9%9–3823.7%†47–6177.0%43.6%49.5%35.7%525:50 +8:2164.6%9.0 +2.5
Curtis Williams2320:5039.9%6.12.80.60.50.30.93.030–6645.5%19–6628.8%24–3470.6%44.3%48.0%25.8%29:45 −11:059.8%7.0 +0.9
D.J. Jefferson2517:2736.4%7.42.90.40.60.41.51.038–8146.9%30–8834.1%20–3360.6%49.1%50.7%19.5%316:46 −0:4125.1%9.3 +1.9
NaVuan Peterson2513:1727.7%3.42.00.80.40.40.51.413–2552.0%†16–5827.6%11–1384.6%†44.6%†47.9%†15.7%†511:11 −2:0628.0%1.4 −2.0
Riek Riek2410:3221.1%1.31.30.50.10.30.82.05–1050.0%†6–2030.0%†4–580.0%†46.7%†49.7%†16.7%†510:49 +0:1727.0%0.6 −0.7
Bo Barber158:0710.1%1.10.70.80.40.00.70.94–666.7%†0–70.0%†8–988.9%†30.8%†47.2%†69.2%†11:42 −6:250.8%0.0 −1.1
Julius Clark715:269.0%6.11.90.30.10.10.71.911–1764.7%†2–922.2%†15–2268.2%†53.8%†60.3%†84.6%†————
Ahmadou Ndiaye85:013.3%0.40.80.10.10.10.92.00–30.0%†1–250.0%†0–10.0%†30.0%†27.6%†20.0%†————
Cameron Gales81:291.0%0.40.10.00.00.00.00.00–20.0%†1–250.0%†0–0—37.5%†37.5%†0.0%†————
Paul Lindberg71:401.0%0.40.40.10.00.10.00.10–20.0%†1–1100.0%†0–0—50.0%†50.0%†0.0%†12:44 +1:041.4%3.0 +2.6
Isaiah Hicks41:300.5%0.50.50.30.00.00.30.31–250.0%†0–20.0%†0–0—25.0%†25.0%†0.0%†12:17 +0:471.1%2.0 +1.5
Team, games with logs · per game30 games66.230.29.72.514.0499–102748.6%211–68031.0%354–51768.5%47.8%51.3%30.3%
Sum of players66.226.79.76.12.413.417.7Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.50.0+0.1+0.6

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$190K
80% Range $69K to $510K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$180K to $205K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
16
4 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Jacob Hogarth63.8%$8K$1K to $43K7.2%$8K to $9K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Colin Hawkins63.0%$4K$1K to $25K2.2%$4K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ace Talbert61.0%$17K$1K to $77K11.9%$17K to $18K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Spence Sims59.3%$8K$1K to $45K7.2%$8K to $9K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jacob Hudson57.5%$14K$1K to $67K10.9%$14K to $15K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jamias Ferere45.4%$9K$1K to $40K8.2%$8K to $9K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
D.J. Jefferson39.3%$8K$1K to $38K6.9%$8K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Curtis Williams37.6%$8K$1K to $38K7.3%$8K to $9K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
NaVuan Peterson27.1%$13K$1K to $85K6.9%$12K to $14K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Riek Riek23.1%$7K$1K to $31K4.8%$6K to $7K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Bo Barber10.5%$6K$1K to $62K3.2%$6K to $7K$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Julius Clark8.3%$3K$1K to $13K2.2%$3K in all four$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ahmadou Ndiaye2.1%$1K$0 to $3K0.6%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Paul Lindberg0.9%$1K$0 to $3K0.6%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Cameron Gales0.7%$1K$0 to $3K0.6%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Hicks0.4%$1K$0 to $3K0.6%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$190K$69K to $510K100%$180K to $205K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Gardner-Webb University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$1,495,968Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$1,495,968
Athletics department expenses$17,654,126
Athletics department revenue$17,654,126

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 30 games, 2,123 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

StatisticTeamOpponents
Points66.286.7
Field goals made23.730.8
Field goals attempted56.962.1
3-pointers made7.09.2
3-pointers attempted22.725.5
Free throws made11.815.9
Free throws attempted17.221.9
Offensive rebounds8.412.6
Defensive rebounds21.827.7
Total rebounds30.240.3
Assists9.717.0
Blocks2.53.6
Turnovers14.010.8
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 183.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 532.
Minutes (derived)200.0

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled1,9851,9850±9.90
Field goals madeReconciled7107100±3.60
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,7071,7070±8.50
3-pointers madeReconciled2112110±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled6806800±3.40
Free throws madeReconciled3543540±2.00
Free throws attemptedReconciled5175170±2.60
Offensive reboundsNo player split
Defensive reboundsNo player split
Total reboundsResidual shown905800+105±72.40
AssistsReconciled2912910±2.00
BlocksReconciled7573+2±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown421403+18±12.60
StealsNo team figure183
Personal foulsNo team figure532
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,0005,986+14.0±120.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Jacob Hogarth63.8%-3.4range -4.7 to -1.7Sufficient evidence
Colin Hawkins63.0%-5.8range -7.2 to -4.2Sufficient evidence
Ace Talbert61.0%-1.6range -2.8 to -0.8Sufficient evidence
Spence Sims59.3%-3.2range -4.8 to -1.6Sufficient evidence
Jacob Hudson57.5%-2.1range -3.5 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Jamias Ferere45.4%-2.4range -3.2 to -1.3Sufficient evidence
D.J. Jefferson39.3%-2.6range -3.7 to -1.1Sufficient evidence
Curtis Williams37.6%-2.2range -3.0 to -1.1Sufficient evidence
NaVuan Peterson27.1%-1.1range -2.1 to -0.0Sufficient evidence
Riek Riek23.1%-1.9range -3.2 to -0.6Sufficient evidence
Bo Barber10.5%-1.1range -2.1 to -0.1Limited evidence
Julius Clark8.3%-1.7range -2.9 to -0.8Limited evidence
Ahmadou Ndiaye2.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Paul Lindberg0.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Cameron Gales0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Isaiah Hicks0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+6.6range +5.9 to +7.5Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

12 valued players hold 99.2% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.8%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 3.8%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value