LSU

SEC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 106 · Raw net 4.2 · Tempo 68.6 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-11

Record: 15–17; 15 wins
AdjNet: 9.5β; rank 69 of 365
AdjO: 116.6β; rank 49 of 365
AdjD: 107.1β; rank 149 of 365
AdjT: 67.8β
SOS: 7.0β; rank 56 of 363
NCSOS: -4.6β
WAB: -4.6β; rank 97 of 363
RR: -2.1β
Exp. W: 17.1β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	115.553	111.3258	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.8112	50.9150	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.6109	13.9338	16.7
Offensive rebound %	33.187	31.7239	30.6
FTA / FGA %	40.948	37.8256	35.0
Shooting
3P%	33.1225	35.4270	33.9
2P%	54.577	49.581	51.7
FT%	76.443	69.847	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	34.5	37.9	39.5
Assists / FGM %	52.5	46.3	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	10.3	8.3	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	25.0	31.4	31.4
2-pointers %	52.2	48.0	48.8
Free throws %	22.8	20.6	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.7
Top Three Share of Minutes: 44%
Bench Share of Minutes: 33%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-05	Tarleton St.	W 96–60	68.2	Home	1–0
11-10	LSU New Orleans	W 93–58	72.7	Home	2–0
11-13	FIU	W 98–81	77.6	Home	3–0
11-18	Alcorn	W 107–81	72.9	Home	4–0
11-21	Omaha	W 99–73	77.6	Home	5–0
11-28	Drake	W 71–62	68.3	Neutral	6–0
11-29	DePaul	W 96–63	69.1	Neutral	7–0
12-03	Boston College	W 78–69 1OT	75.7	Away	8–0
12-07	Texas Tech	L 58–82	70.8	Neutral	8–1
12-13	SMU	W 89–77	64.4	Neutral	9–1
12-19	Southeastern La.	W 78–65	61.5	Home	10–1
12-22	Prairie View	W 104–90	74.3	Home	11–1
12-29	Southern Miss.	W 90–62	70.3	Home	12–1
01-03	Texas A&M	L 72–75	72.2	Away	12–2
01-06	South Carolina	L 68–78	63.8	Home	12–3
01-10	Vanderbilt	L 73–84	71.4	Away	12–4
01-14	Kentucky	L 74–75	66.9	Home	12–5
01-17	Missouri	W 78–70	62.1	Home	13–5
01-20	Florida	L 61–79	67.0	Away	13–6
01-24	Arkansas	L 81–85	68.7	Away	13–7
01-28	Mississippi St.	L 66–80	67.7	Home	13–8
01-31	South Carolina	W 92–87 1OT	74.8	Away	14–8
02-07	Georgia	L 71–83	65.9	Home	14–9
02-10	Arkansas	L 62–91	74.6	Home	14–10
02-14	Tennessee	L 63–73	58.5	Away	14–11
02-17	Texas	L 85–88	68.6	Away	14–12
02-21	Alabama	L 83–90	71.0	Home	14–13
02-25	Ole Miss	W 106–99 2OT	84.3	Away	15–13
02-28	Oklahoma	L 67–83	65.3	Home	15–14
03-03	Auburn	L 74–88	67.4	Away	15–15
03-07	Texas A&M	L 91–94 3OT	92.2	Home	15–16
03-11	Kentucky	L 82–87	70.2	Neutral	15–17

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Marquel Sutton	32	31:25	76.4%	16.7	9.3	0.8	0.8	0.4	1.2	2.7	106–195	54.4%	33–109	30.3%	108–131	82.4%	51.2%	57.9%	43.1%	5	31:58 +0:33	71.0%	8.0 −5.1
Max Mackinnon	31	31:42	74.7%	19.8	3.3	3.1	0.7	0.4	2.5	2.5	96–212	45.3%	67–178	37.6%	93–106	87.7%	50.4%	55.7%	27.2%	5	37:36 +5:54	83.6%	20.4 +4.7
Pablo Tamba	32	28:38	69.7%	11.1	10.1	2.1	1.6	0.7	1.4	4.1	81–120	67.5%	8–25	32.0%†	68–112	60.7%	64.1%	65.4%	77.2%	5	32:59 +4:21	73.3%	10.2 +2.3
Jalen Reece	32	23:42	57.7%	9.8	3.1	6.1	1.5	0.2	2.2	2.7	41–102	40.2%	23–77	29.9%	34–47	72.3%	42.2%	46.3%	26.3%	5	41:43 +18:01	92.7%	10.6 +4.8
Michael Nwoko	32	21:53	53.3%	24.4	10.8	1.5	0.8	1.5	3.3	6.1	155–251	61.8%	0–3	0.0%†	118–155	76.1%	61.0%	66.4%	61.0%	5	27:26 +5:33	61.0%	16.0 +2.6
Robert Miller III	31	19:20	45.6%	12.6	8.0	1.5	1.8	2.9	2.4	5.8	69–104	66.3%	0–1	0.0%†	51–73	69.9%	65.7%	68.9%	69.5%	4	23:22 +4:02	41.5%	8.8 +2.7
Rashad King	32	18:23	44.7%	12.6	4.6	2.6	1.5	0.5	2.0	4.3	37–72	51.4%	26–88	29.5%	33–42	78.6%	47.5%	51.8%	26.3%	5	19:52 +1:29	44.1%	6.0 +0.2
Dedan Thomas Jr.	16	29:20	35.7%	20.8	3.7	8.9	1.3	0.3	2.2	2.0	70–138	50.7%	13–43	30.2%†	65–78	83.3%	49.4%	56.7%	43.1%	—	—	—	—
PJ Carter	26	10:22	20.5%	15.6	3.4	1.0	0.6	0.1	0.6	3.0	6–14	42.9%	29–86	33.7%	6–7	85.7%†	49.5%	50.9%	7.0%	5	12:58 +2:36	28.8%	5.2 +1.2
Mazi Mosley	19	6:10	8.9%	11.6	4.1	1.7	0.7	0.0	1.7	2.4	2–9	22.2%†	10–26	38.5%†	0–1	0.0%†	48.6%†	48.0%†	2.9%†	2	2:13 −3:57	2.0%	1.5 −0.3
Jalen ReedFew games	6	17:56	8.2%	21.2	12.6	1.5	1.9	0.7	4.1	3.7	17–28	60.7%†	3–7	42.9%†	14–21	66.7%†	61.4%†	64.4%†	60.0%†	—	—	—	—
Ron ZipperFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	3:28	2.4%	25.7	5.1	2.6	2.6	1.3	3.9	3.9	0–2	0.0%†	5–12	41.7%†	5–6	83.3%†	53.6%†	60.1%†	42.9%†	—	—	—	—
Jaden BobbettFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	0:45	0.4%	0.0	7.6	7.6	0.0	0.0	7.6	7.6	0–1	0.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	32 games			79.3	35.9	14.3	not published	3.8	10.7	not published	680–1248	54.5%	217–656	33.1%	595–779	76.4%	52.8%	58.0%	40.9%
Sum of players				79.3	33.4	14.3	5.8	3.8	10.3	18.2	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+2.5	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.4	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.55M; 80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.55M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 2 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Marquel Sutton	78.0%	$420K	$115K to $685K	12.7%	$420K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Max Mackinnon	77.7%	$560K	$295K to $875K	15.8%	$560K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Pablo Tamba	71.1%	$755K	$450K to $1.45M	20.3%	$755K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Jalen Reece	59.3%	$180K	$24K to $385K	5.3%	$180K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Michael Nwoko	54.0%	$385K	$210K to $595K	10.9%	$385K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Robert Miller III	43.9%	$215K	$44K to $370K	6.6%	$215K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Rashad King	43.7%	$115K	$21K to $280K	3.6%	$115K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dedan Thomas Jr.	33.6%	$470K	$275K to $1.00M	12.7%	$470K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
PJ Carter	19.7%	$91K	$26K to $165K	2.8%	$91K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mazi Mosley	8.9%	$59K	$26K to $100K	1.8%	$59K in all four	$26K	Limited evidence
Jalen Reed	8.1%	$93K	$61K to $145K	2.6%	$93K in all four	$26K	Limited evidence
Ron Zipper	1.8%	$26K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$26K in all four	$26K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jaden Bobbett	0.3%	$26K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$26K in all four	$26K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.55M	$2.60M to $4.95M	100%	$3.55M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$13,624,943
Men's basketball expenses	$11,104,405
Athletics department expenses	$219,649,408
Athletics department revenue	$223,457,268

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 32 games, 2,256 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1315 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	79.3	76.4
Field goals made	27.3	26.3
Field goals attempted	57.9	59.6
3-pointers made	6.6	8.0
3-pointers attempted	20.0	22.6
Free throws made	18.1	15.7
Free throws attempted	23.7	22.5
Offensive rebounds	10.9	11.6
Defensive rebounds	25.0	22.1
Total rebounds	35.9	33.7
Assists	14.3	12.2
Blocks	3.8	3.2
Turnovers	10.7	9.6
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 191.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 598.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,606	2,606	0	±13.0	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	897	897	0	±4.5	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,904	1,904	0	±9.5	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	217	217	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	656	656	0	±3.3	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	595	595	0	±3.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	779	779	0	±3.9	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Reconciled	1,180	1,098	+82	±94.4	0
Assists	Reconciled	471	471	0	±2.4	0
Blocks	Reconciled	125	125	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	352	340	+12	±10.6	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	191	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	598	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,575	6,551	+24.4	±131.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Marquel Sutton	78.0%	+0.8range -0.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Max Mackinnon	77.7%	+1.7range +0.5 to +3.0Sufficient evidence
Pablo Tamba	71.1%	+3.2range +1.9 to +4.5Sufficient evidence
Jalen Reece	59.3%	-0.8range -2.0 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Michael Nwoko	54.0%	+1.5range +0.6 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Robert Miller III	43.9%	+0.3range -0.7 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Rashad King	43.7%	-1.3range -2.6 to -0.0Sufficient evidence
Dedan Thomas Jr.	33.6%	+4.1range +3.0 to +5.3Sufficient evidence
PJ Carter	19.7%	-0.4range -1.2 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Mazi Mosley	8.9%	+0.1range -0.9 to +1.0Limited evidence
Jalen Reed	8.1%	+2.3range +1.5 to +3.1Limited evidence
Ron Zipper	1.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jaden Bobbett	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.6range +9.8 to +11.4Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.6% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.4%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 3.4%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value

LSU