Wyoming

MWC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 90 · Raw net 5.5 · Tempo 67.7 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-17

Record: 17–14; 17 wins
AdjNet: 6.1β; rank 90 of 365
AdjO: 112.7β; rank 85 of 365
AdjD: 106.6β; rank 130 of 365
AdjT: 67.6β
SOS: 1.9β; rank 111 of 363
NCSOS: -4.1β
WAB: -5.1β; rank 108 of 363
RR: -1.1β
Exp. W: 18.1β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	112.888	107.4144	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.0149	51.6191	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	16.5166	16.8171	16.7
Offensive rebound %	34.164	28.268	30.6
FTA / FGA %	36.3143	47.3359	35.0
Shooting
3P%	33.0229	32.690	33.9
2P%	53.893	53.2244	51.7
FT%	74.4104	69.327	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	43.0	35.9	39.5
Assists / FGM %	54.2	44.9	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	7.1	10.5	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	32.5	25.8	31.4
2-pointers %	46.8	50.1	48.8
Free throws %	20.6	24.1	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.7
Top Three Share of Minutes: 41%
Bench Share of Minutes: 38%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-08	Cal St. Fullerton	W 92–82	84.0	Home	1–0
11-11	Austin Peay	W 79–65	76.7	Home	2–0
11-15	Portland	W 93–56	70.4	Home	3–0
11-19	Sam Houston	L 70–78	71.1	Away	3–1
11-23	Norfolk St.	W 75–67	66.8	Home	4–1
11-26	Denver	W 101–59	70.4	Home	5–1
11-30	Texas Tech	L 72–76	67.7	Away	5–2
12-06	Dartmouth	W 93–80	72.7	Home	6–2
12-09	South Dakota	W 106–79	74.3	Home	7–2
12-15	South Dakota St.	W 87–72	67.0	Neutral	8–2
12-20	Grand Canyon	L 70–82	73.4	Home	8–3
12-30	Air Force	W 68–56	68.7	Away	9–3
01-03	New Mexico	L 58–78	60.9	Away	9–4
01-06	UNLV	W 98–66	72.1	Home	10–4
01-10	Nevada	L 83–92	61.6	Away	10–5
01-14	San Diego St.	L 57–74	65.8	Home	10–6
01-17	Fresno St.	L 60–63	60.8	Away	10–7
01-20	Boise St.	L 65–81	64.9	Home	10–8
01-24	San Jose St.	W 66–62	63.2	Home	11–8
01-28	Utah St.	L 62–94	65.8	Away	11–9
01-31	Colorado St.	W 68–57	58.6	Home	12–9
02-03	San Diego St.	L 63–72	67.2	Away	12–10
02-07	Utah St.	L 83–85	67.7	Home	12–11
02-17	Fresno St.	W 92–82	65.3	Home	13–11
02-21	Grand Canyon	W 70–65	67.5	Away	14–11
02-24	Boise St.	L 62–72	63.7	Away	14–12
02-28	Air Force	W 66–62	65.3	Home	15–12
03-03	Nevada	W 83–73	66.3	Home	16–12
03-07	San Jose St.	W 88–78	60.3	Away	17–12
03-11	UNLV	L 70–73	65.6	Neutral	17–13
03-17	Wichita St.	L 70–74	74.7	—	17–14

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Khaden Bennett	31	28:10	70.4%	14.2	6.6	3.9	2.2	0.1	1.9	4.0	52–113	46.0%	41–116	35.3%	84–104	80.8%	49.6%	56.6%	45.4%	5	27:40 −0:30	69.2%	10.2 +0.2
Leland Walker	31	27:58	69.9%	19.6	4.4	5.4	1.2	0.3	3.2	3.2	107–230	46.5%	34–112	30.4%	108–127	85.0%	46.2%	53.3%	37.1%	5	31:18 +3:20	78.3%	8.8 −4.9
Nasir Meyer	29	27:50	65.1%	18.2	7.2	3.4	1.4	0.1	2.7	3.0	83–148	56.1%	45–133	33.8%	67–89	75.3%	53.6%	57.5%	31.7%	5	31:18 +3:28	78.3%	12.0 −0.7
Damarion Dennis	30	23:19	56.4%	18.6	5.5	2.4	1.5	0.5	1.1	2.6	85–137	62.0%	33–95	34.7%	57–64	89.1%	58.0%	62.7%	27.6%	5	33:45 +10:26	84.4%	15.8 +4.9
Adam Harakow	31	18:55	47.3%	12.6	5.9	1.4	1.0	0.5	1.3	4.5	32–54	59.3%	29–77	37.7%	33–49	67.3%	57.6%	60.3%	37.4%	5	17:49 −1:06	44.5%	7.0 +1.1
Uriyah Rojas	31	16:51	42.1%	14.9	4.7	4.1	1.0	0.1	1.5	2.0	38–82	46.3%	30–95	31.6%	29–38	76.3%	46.9%	50.3%	21.5%	5	17:43 +0:52	44.3%	4.0 −2.3
Gavin Gores	27	18:05	39.4%	16.2	7.6	0.8	0.7	0.8	2.1	5.3	68–101	67.3%	3–16	18.8%†	53–77	68.8%	62.0%	65.6%	65.8%	5	20:32 +2:26	51.3%	11.0 +3.7
Kiani Saxon	31	15:03	37.6%	5.7	7.6	1.1	0.9	1.7	1.8	5.8	20–39	51.3%†	6–16	37.5%†	9–28	32.1%	52.7%†	49.8%†	50.9%†	5	9:44 −5:19	24.3%	2.0 −0.2
Abou Magassa	27	10:21	22.5%	11.6	10.9	0.7	1.1	0.9	2.0	9.5	31–55	56.4%†	0–0	—	19–37	51.4%	56.4%†	56.8%†	67.3%†	3	2:15 −8:06	3.4%	1.3 −1.7
Simm Saadi	30	8:33	20.7%	15.3	5.0	1.4	0.9	0.9	2.2	6.7	12–24	50.0%†	23–75	30.7%	5–5	100.0%†	47.0%†	48.4%†	5.1%†	5	7:56 −0:37	19.8%	3.8 +0.5
Matija Belic	12	17:11	16.6%	11.8	10.9	1.9	1.6	1.2	4.7	7.8	19–32	59.4%†	4–18	22.2%†	11–22	50.0%†	50.0%†	51.1%†	44.0%†	—	—	—	—
Jared Harris	11	9:45	8.6%	17.2	9.0	1.1	2.6	0.0	1.1	4.5	7–14	50.0%†	6–20	30.0%†	14–17	82.4%†	47.1%†	55.4%†	50.0%†	—	—	—	—
Garrett SpielmanFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	2:11	1.2%	20.9	10.4	2.6	5.2	0.0	2.6	7.8	1–3	33.3%†	2–3	66.7%†	0–0	—	66.7%†	66.7%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Talan TaylorFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	2:26	0.6%	16.4	10.9	5.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	1–2	50.0%†	0–0	—	75.0%†	75.0%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	31 games			76.5	35.4	14.2	not published	2.5	11.2	not published	555–1032	53.8%	257–778	33.0%	489–657	74.4%	52.0%	56.5%	36.3%
Sum of players				76.5	32.4	14.2	6.7	2.5	10.5	21.0	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.0	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.7	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $835K; 80% Range $365K to $1.90M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $710K to $885K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 2 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Khaden Bennett	69.6%	$150K	$62K to $370K	17.0%	$125K to $160K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Leland Walker	69.5%	$63K	$8K to $180K	9.5%	$53K to $66K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Nasir Meyer	67.0%	$120K	$44K to $295K	14.0%	$100K to $125K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Damarion Dennis	55.2%	$110K	$40K to $285K	12.4%	$91K to $115K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Adam Harakow	45.8%	$56K	$14K to $150K	7.8%	$48K to $59K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Uriyah Rojas	43.2%	$87K	$33K to $225K	10.1%	$74K to $92K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Gavin Gores	38.4%	$51K	$15K to $130K	7.0%	$43K to $54K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kiani Saxon	37.0%	$24K	$4K to $81K	3.8%	$21K to $26K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Abou Magassa	23.1%	$35K	$11K to $89K	4.6%	$29K to $36K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Simm Saadi	20.5%	$16K	$4K to $50K	2.4%	$14K to $17K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Matija Belic	19.2%	$30K	$11K to $76K	3.9%	$26K to $32K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jared Harris	9.6%	$23K	$10K to $56K	2.7%	$20K to $25K	$6K	Limited evidence
Garrett Spielman	1.2%	$6K	$2K to $14K	0.7%	$5K to $6K	$6K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Talan Taylor	0.7%	$6K	$2K to $14K	0.7%	$5K to $6K	$6K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$835K	$365K to $1.90M	100%	$710K to $885K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Wyoming (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$4,349,840	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$4,349,840
Athletics department expenses	$50,399,891
Athletics department revenue	$50,399,891

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 31 games, 2,100 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1240 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	76.5	72.7
Field goals made	26.2	24.5
Field goals attempted	58.4	53.5
3-pointers made	8.3	6.3
3-pointers attempted	25.1	19.2
Free throws made	15.8	17.5
Free throws attempted	21.2	25.3
Offensive rebounds	11.8	9.3
Defensive rebounds	23.6	22.7
Total rebounds	35.4	32.0
Assists	14.2	11.0
Blocks	2.5	3.5
Turnovers	11.2	11.4
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 207.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 651.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,370	2,370	0	±11.8	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	812	812	0	±4.1	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,810	1,810	0	±9.1	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	257	257	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	778	778	0	±3.9	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	489	489	0	±2.4	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	657	657	0	±3.3	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,097	1,005	+92	±87.8	0
Assists	Reconciled	440	440	0	±2.2	0
Blocks	Reconciled	76	76	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	347	326	+21	±10.4	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	207	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	651	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,200	6,183	+17.2	±124.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Khaden Bennett	69.6%	+2.4range +1.2 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Leland Walker	69.5%	-0.1range -1.2 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Nasir Meyer	67.0%	+1.7range +0.5 to +3.1Sufficient evidence
Damarion Dennis	55.2%	+1.9range +0.8 to +3.0Sufficient evidence
Adam Harakow	45.8%	+0.9range -0.6 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Uriyah Rojas	43.2%	+2.1range +0.8 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Gavin Gores	38.4%	+0.8range -0.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Kiani Saxon	37.0%	-0.9range -2.1 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Abou Magassa	23.1%	+1.1range -0.0 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Simm Saadi	20.5%	-0.9range -2.0 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Matija Belic	19.2%	+1.0range +0.1 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Jared Harris	9.6%	+2.0range +1.0 to +2.7Limited evidence
Garrett Spielman	1.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Talan Taylor	0.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.6range +9.6 to +11.5Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

12 valued players hold 99.6% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.4%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.9%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value