Nasir Meyer
Wyoming · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
807:20 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 27:50
- Points per game
- 12.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.0 / 2.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.7 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.2 | 7.2 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 368 | 145 | 69 | 29 | 2 | 54 | 60 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 128–281 | 45.6% | 9.7 | 13.9 |
| 2P | 83–148 | 56.1% | 5.1 | 7.3 |
| 3P | 45–133 | 33.8% | 4.6 | 6.6 |
| FT | 67–89 | 75.3% | 3.1 | 4.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.6% | 57.5% | 47.3% | 31.7% | 1.28 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Wyoming · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $120K
- 80% range $44K to $295K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.0%
- team pool $835K, 80% range $365K to $1.90M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $100K to $125K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $6K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 67.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Wyoming: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Wyoming | $120Kspeculative | $44K to $295K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.7 | +0.5 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.7 | +0.0 | +4.7range +4.1 to +5.3 | 2,650 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:18 | 27:50 | 9:49–37:37 | |
| Points | 12.0 | 12.7 | 0.0–27.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 48.2% | 51.2% | 0.0%–86.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-17 | Wichita St. | L 70–74 | 29:20 | 16 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-15 | 4-9 | 2-3 | 46.7% |
| 2026-03-11 | UNLV | L 70–73 | 32:05 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3-11 | 1-7 | 7-10 | 31.8% |
| 2026-03-07 | San Jose St. | W 88–78 | 31:13 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-03 | Nevada | W 83–73 | 30:01 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Air Force | W 66–62 | 33:52 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5-11 | 1-4 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Boise St. | L 62–72 | 36:27 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 61.1% |
| 2026-02-21 | Grand Canyon | W 70–65 | 35:56 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-13 | 0-5 | 3-6 | 30.8% |
| 2026-02-17 | Fresno St. | W 92–82 | 30:31 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-15 | 3-8 | 3-3 | 63.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | Utah St. | L 83–85 | 27:06 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-11 | 3-6 | 6-7 | 59.1% |
| 2026-02-03 | San Diego St. | L 63–72 | 13:33 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Colorado St. | W 68–57 | 19:31 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-28 | Utah St. | L 62–94 | 27:24 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-10 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Fresno St. | L 60–63 | 37:37 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 6-13 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | San Diego St. | L 57–74 | 36:59 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-14 | 4-13 | 1-2 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-10 | Nevada | L 83–92 | 32:15 | 27 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-13 | 3-7 | 10-12 | 65.4% |
| 2026-01-06 | UNLV | W 98–66 | 24:31 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-03 | New Mexico | L 58–78 | 33:08 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 56.3% |
| 2025-12-30 | Air Force | W 68–56 | 32:16 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 68.8% |
| 2025-12-20 | Grand Canyon | L 70–82 | 31:07 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-10 | 0-4 | 6-7 | 30.0% |
| 2025-12-15 | South Dakota St. | W 87–72 | 31:36 | 25 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10-14 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 85.7% |
| 2025-12-09 | South Dakota | W 106–79 | 25:21 | 26 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 11-15 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 86.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | Dartmouth | W 93–80 | 31:10 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-13 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | Texas Tech | L 72–76 | 23:52 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-26 | Denver | W 101–59 | 26:35 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-8 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Norfolk St. | W 75–67 | 9:49 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-19 | Sam Houston | L 70–78 | 20:18 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-11 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-15 | Portland | W 93–56 | 14:22 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-11 | Austin Peay | W 79–65 | 23:58 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-6 | 0-3 | 7-8 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Cal St. Fullerton | W 92–82 | 25:27 | 18 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-10 | 3-6 | 5-7 | 65.0% |