Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Air Force

MWC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 363 · Raw net -27.3 · Tempo 67.4 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-11

All seasons
Record
3–28
3 wins
AdjNet
-20.4β
rank 358 of 365
AdjO
95.1β
rank 360 of 365
AdjD
115.5β
rank 328 of 365
AdjT
67.4β
SOS
3.7β
rank 90 of 363
NCSOS
-3.1β
WAB
-18.6β
rank 353 of 363
RR
0.3β
Exp. W
2.7β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.91.3363118.6353108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%49.128856.535251.4
TO / 100 poss.22.036214.929816.7
Offensive rebound %21.735930.618730.6
FTA / FGA %33.821736.422735.0
Shooting
3P%30.932538.035833.9
2P%51.120756.333351.7
FT%63.536572.819872.5
Style
3PA / FGA %42.339.239.5
Assists / FGM %56.054.552.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %6.712.39.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %32.732.031.4
2-pointers %49.349.048.8
Free throws %17.919.019.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
9.1
Top Three Share of Minutes
43%
Bench Share of Minutes
33%
Players with Logged Minutes
17

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03BelmontL 63–7966.6Away0–1
11-08Austin PeayL 54–7471.6Home0–2
11-11LIUL 72–7669.3Home0–3
11-15Miami (OH)L 61–7666.9Home0–4
11-19Alabama St.W 66–6466.5Home1–4
11-21SIUEW 77–6368.5Home2–4
11-23IU IndyW 98–8578.8Home3–4
11-26Northern Colo.L 53–7161.2Home3–5
12-03PacificL 65–8060.9Home3–6
12-07NavyL 56–6163.4Away3–7
12-17San Diego St.L 58–8163.9Away3–8
12-30WyomingL 56–6868.7Home3–9
01-03UNLVL 39–6765.3Away3–10
01-06Utah St.L 62–9966.1Home3–11
01-10New MexicoL 49–9168.8Home3–12
01-13San Jose St.L 62–7061.3Away3–13
01-17NevadaL 66–8168.4Home3–14
01-20Colorado St.L 52–8165.3Away3–15
01-24Boise St.L 54–9662.0Away3–16
01-31Fresno St.L 62–7971.4Home3–17
02-03Grand CanyonL 57–8168.8Away3–18
02-07San Diego St.L 54–8870.2Home3–19
02-10Colorado St.L 74–9165.3Home3–20
02-14Fresno St.L 63–9372.9Away3–21
02-17New MexicoL 61–9870.7Away3–22
02-21UNLVL 66–9169.0Home3–23
02-24San Jose St.L 80–8666.2Home3–24
02-28WyomingL 62–6665.3Away3–25
03-03Grand CanyonL 60–8668.7Home3–26
03-07NevadaL 59–7464.8Away3–27
03-11NevadaL 45–8071.2Neutral3–28

Roster · 17 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groupsMinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Kam Sanders3129:4974.5%12.44.23.81.00.02.31.983–20241.1%41–11336.3%96–13770.1%45.9%51.3%43.5%531:43 +1:5479.3%16.0 +3.6
Lucas Hobin3128:4872.0%11.42.00.60.40.11.32.237–7847.4%69–21432.2%73–8883.0%48.1%53.5%30.1%531:36 +2:4979.0%8.0 −3.4
Eli Robinson3028:0467.9%7.85.21.61.10.41.82.184–16351.5%14–3935.9%†24–3764.9%52.0%53.6%18.3%528:50 +0:4672.1%9.4 +1.6
Ethan Greenberg3127:0667.8%6.72.41.00.90.11.11.119–4542.2%52–15034.7%15–2268.2%†49.7%51.1%11.3%530:45 +3:3876.9%5.4 −1.3
Wesley Celichowski3121:0652.7%4.82.41.30.30.51.12.548–8357.8%10–6116.4%24–4553.3%43.8%45.8%31.3%524:25 +3:1961.0%4.4 −0.4
Caleb Walker2321:1339.4%10.05.00.80.40.42.02.089–13068.5%0–10.0%†51–10946.8%67.9%64.0%83.2%517:35 −3:3844.0%6.8 −3.2
AJ Patterson2814:1232.1%2.21.91.70.70.11.72.222–4845.8%†1–714.3%†15–2268.2%†42.7%†47.9%†40.0%†512:02 −2:1130.1%1.4 −0.8
Kolby Gilles3112:3531.4%3.31.70.60.20.11.61.834–6155.7%†3–2213.6%†24–4158.5%46.4%†50.0%†49.4%†511:58 −0:3729.9%5.6 +2.3
Justin Hinds2811:2225.7%1.41.40.50.30.30.71.29–2437.5%†5–3016.7%†7–1258.3%†30.6%†33.7%†22.2%†42:04 −9:184.1%0.5 −0.9
Riley Dering1413:2015.0%5.42.80.00.40.60.42.129–4860.4%†2–366.7%†12–1866.7%†62.7%†64.5%†35.3%†410:11 −3:0920.4%3.8 −1.7
Kyle MarshallFew gamesUnder 100 minutes416:255.3%3.52.82.00.50.30.31.37–1546.7%†0–20.0%†0–30.0%†41.2%†38.2%†17.6%†————
Brendan MartinUnder 100 minutes125:095.0%1.80.40.20.20.00.20.35–683.3%†4–1526.7%†0–20.0%†52.4%†50.3%†9.5%†20:32 −4:370.5%0.0 −1.8
Josh GateteUnder 100 minutes154:014.9%0.30.40.30.20.20.70.40–30.0%†1–425.0%†1–250.0%†21.4%†25.4%†28.6%†20:32 −3:290.5%0.0 −0.3
Sam ImadeUnder 100 minutes103:022.4%0.80.10.00.00.00.00.01–616.7%†2–450.0%†0–0—40.0%†40.0%†0.0%†————
Elliott TaiteUnder 100 minutes121:251.4%1.50.20.20.00.00.10.03–650.0%†4–757.1%†0–10.0%†69.2%†67.0%†7.7%†20:32 −0:530.5%2.0 +0.5
Chris CatchingsFew gamesUnder 100 minutes51:410.7%0.00.40.80.20.00.20.40–10.0%†0–20.0%†0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†20:32 −1:090.5%0.0 0.0
Keaton FrischFew gamesUnder 100 minutes20:140.0%0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00–0—0–0—0–0————————
Team, games with logs · per game31 games61.529.312.3not published2.314.8not published470–91951.1%208–67430.9%342–53963.5%49.1%52.1%33.8%
Sum of players61.526.512.35.52.313.517.7Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+2.8−0.0not published0.0+1.3not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$0 (assumed opted out)
80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier
Mid and high major
low to medium evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

No EADA match for this school.

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 31 games, 2,088 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points61.579.9
Field goals made21.928.1
Field goals attempted51.457.2
3-pointers made6.78.5
3-pointers attempted21.722.4
Free throws made11.015.2
Free throws attempted17.420.8
Offensive rebounds7.19.8
Defensive rebounds22.225.8
Total rebounds29.335.6
Assists12.315.3
Blocks2.33.6
Turnovers14.810.0
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 171.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 549.
Minutes (derived)200.0not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled1,9061,9060±9.50
Field goals madeReconciled6786780±3.40
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,5931,5930±8.00
3-pointers madeReconciled2082080±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled6746740±3.40
Free throws madeReconciled3423420±2.00
Free throws attemptedReconciled5395390±2.70
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown909822+87±72.70
AssistsReconciled380381−1±2.00
BlocksReconciled72720±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown460419+41±13.80
StealsNo team figurenot published171not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published549not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,2006,177+22.7±124.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Kam Sanders75.2%-2.3range -3.2 to -1.0Sufficient evidence
Lucas Hobin71.5%-4.5range -5.8 to -3.0Sufficient evidence
Eli Robinson68.7%-3.0range -4.2 to -1.4Sufficient evidence
Ethan Greenberg67.2%-2.5range -3.5 to -1.1Sufficient evidence
Wesley Celichowski53.0%-2.6range -4.5 to -1.0Sufficient evidence
Caleb Walker39.1%-1.8range -3.3 to -0.4Sufficient evidence
AJ Patterson31.6%-3.0range -4.4 to -1.4Sufficient evidence
Kolby Gilles31.6%-4.1range -5.2 to -2.9Sufficient evidence
Justin Hinds25.7%-2.6range -3.6 to -1.5Sufficient evidence
Riley Dering15.4%-0.9range -1.8 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Kyle Marshall5.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Brendan Martin5.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Josh Gatete5.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Sam Imade2.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Elliott Taite1.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Chris Catchings0.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Keaton Frisch0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+6.3range +5.4 to +7.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 95.8% of on-court time. 7 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 4.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value