Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Matija Belic

Wyoming · 2025–26 · 12 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance

Logged performance

206:07 minutes logged

Games logged
12
Minutes per game
17:11
Points per game
5.1
Rebounds / assists per game
4.7 / 0.8
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game5.14.70.80.70.52.03.3
Per 40 minutes11.810.91.91.61.24.77.8
Season totals615610862440
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG23–5046.0%†4.29.7
2P19–3259.4%†2.76.2
3P4–1822.2%†1.53.5
FT11–2250.0%†1.84.3
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
50.0%†51.1%†36.0%†44.0%†0.42

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

Wyoming · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.

Speculative best guess
$30K
80% range $11K to $76K
Median share of team pool
3.9%
team pool $835K, 80% range $365K to $1.90M
Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
$26K to $32K
the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
Floor part
$6K
shared by every player with possessions
Possession share
19.2%
Sufficient evidence
Point and 80% range on the team table's axis. Open circle: limited evidence or floor only.
  • Range driven by assumption, not data

Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.

Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.

Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks

Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.

Wyoming: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Net points per 100 possessions by season, newest first. The speculative compensation best guess for 2025–26 only sits right after the team, so it is the first figure after the season. Ordered by season, not by value or dollars. Compensation is a best guess of a share of the school’s own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleNetRangeEvidenceRange graphic. Position on one axisOffenseDefenseWins above replacementOn-court possessionsSample and flags
2026Wyoming$30Kspeculative$11K to $76Kdescriptive: not used in fit or gates+1.0+0.1 to +1.9Sufficient evidence-1.2+2.2+1.3range +1.1 to +1.4759Season detail
2025WyomingNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc-3.4-4.5 to -2.2Sufficient evidence-1.4-2.0+0.9range +0.5 to +1.21,111Season detail
2024UC Santa BarbaraNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc-1.4-2.4 to -0.3Sufficient evidence-0.4-1.1+1.1range +0.8 to +1.41,288Season detail
2023UC Santa BarbaraNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc-1.5-2.3 to -0.7Limited evidence+0.2-1.7+0.3range +0.2 to +0.4324Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
DateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2025-12-30Air ForceW 68–5616:1509001220-20-20-00.0%
2025-12-20Grand CanyonL 70–8223:4052100252-70-31-228.6%
2025-12-15South Dakota St.W 87–7224:47106101133-31-13-3116.7%
2025-12-09South DakotaW 106–7919:2896110354-60-21-266.7%
2025-12-06DartmouthW 93–808:4501110000-30-10-00.0%
2025-11-30Texas TechL 72–7617:0453010342-31-10-083.3%
2025-11-26DenverW 101–5915:50134010235-60-03-683.3%
2025-11-23Norfolk St.W 75–678:4334102631-41-20-037.5%
2025-11-19Sam HoustonL 70–7820:4523311051-30-20-033.3%
2025-11-15PortlandW 93–5616:1947111022-50-10-040.0%
2025-11-11Austin PeayW 79–6516:0155110441-30-13-533.3%
2025-11-08Cal St. FullertonW 92–8218:3056010142-51-20-450.0%