Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Sam Houston

CUSA · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 104 · Raw net 4.4 · Tempo 70.6 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-18

All seasons
Record
19–12
19 wins
AdjNet
4.7β
rank 103 of 365
AdjO
112.7β
rank 86 of 365
AdjD
108.0β
rank 170 of 365
AdjT
70.6β
SOS
0.9β
rank 132 of 363
NCSOS
4.4β
WAB
-4.9β
rank 103 of 363
RR
0.4β
Exp. W
18.6β

Scouting Report

CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.113.280108.9191108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%52.512851.418051.4
TO / 100 poss.16.818116.121916.7
Offensive rebound %35.92530.116930.6
FTA / FGA %34.419936.723035.0
Shooting
3P%37.22432.58933.9
2P%50.622853.325151.7
FT%71.621669.95172.5
Style
3PA / FGA %35.841.839.5
Assists / FGM %52.650.452.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %7.68.59.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %30.831.731.4
2-pointers %50.248.348.8
Free throws %19.020.019.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.9
Top Three Share of Minutes
41%
Bench Share of Minutes
34%
Players with Logged Minutes
11

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-07Texas TechL 77–9870.5Away0–1
11-15UtahL 79–8573.7Away0–2
11-19WyomingW 78–7071.1Home1–2
11-26Idaho St.W 84–8172.4Neutral2–2
11-28IdahoW 94–6863.7Neutral3–2
12-02Oklahoma St.L 83–9378.8Away3–3
12-06Texas SouthernW 82–7079.3Away4–3
12-17Oregon St.W 85–7574.5Away5–3
12-21New Mexico St.L 78–8774.3Away5–4
01-02Western Ky.L 91–10277.4Away5–5
01-04Middle Tenn.L 67–6868.2Away5–6
01-08DelawareW 72–6062.6Home6–6
01-10LibertyL 74–8271.3Home6–7
01-14Jacksonville St.W 77–6262.2Away7–7
01-17FIUW 76–6374.9Away8–7
01-21Kennesaw St.W 93–8773.5Home9–7
01-24Western Ky.W 73–5867.0Home10–7
01-28Missouri St.W 80–7168.8Away11–7
01-31Louisiana TechW 83–6765.1Home12–7
02-04UTEPW 70–6669.7Home13–7
02-07Louisiana TechL 78–8776.3Away13–8
02-14Kennesaw St.W 83–7966.2Away14–8
02-18Middle Tenn.W 78–7069.6Home15–8
02-21Jacksonville St.W 82–7867.4Home16–8
02-26FIUW 100–6773.3Home17–8
02-28Missouri St.W 86–8167.6Home18–8
03-05DelawareL 80–8371.2Away18–9
03-07LibertyL 72–7962.2Away18–10
03-11New Mexico St.W 69–6171.5Neutral19–10
03-13Kennesaw St.L 73–7969.7Neutral19–11
03-18New MexicoL 83–10776.0—19–12

Roster · 11 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

MinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Damon Nicholas Jr.3128:1070.4%8.25.51.81.10.11.22.470–15545.2%25–6936.2%40–4981.6%48.0%51.9%21.9%534:19 +6:0985.8%10.2 +2.0
Kashie Natt3127:1568.1%11.38.22.52.00.51.32.680–17545.7%30–7639.5%100–12878.1%49.8%56.9%51.0%534:02 +6:4785.1%11.6 +0.3
Po'Boigh King2829:0165.5%14.42.01.60.70.20.91.568–14546.9%64–16838.1%74–8785.1%52.4%57.2%27.8%215:38 −13:2415.6%4.5 −9.9
Jacob Walker3125:2163.4%11.22.12.30.90.11.92.175–15249.3%30–8535.3%106–14374.1%50.6%57.7%60.3%533:32 +8:1083.8%16.0 +4.8
Veljko Ilic3125:1963.3%11.56.62.20.80.51.62.0155–26658.3%0–10.0%†47–10743.9%58.1%56.8%40.1%528:29 +3:1171.2%14.6 +3.1
Jacobe Coleman3021:2251.7%8.32.41.30.50.00.91.550–9652.1%41–10838.0%27–3969.2%54.7%56.5%19.1%533:54 +12:3384.8%12.2 +3.9
Justin Begg2026:4443.1%9.92.53.50.70.13.52.039–8446.4%31–9233.7%28–3873.7%48.6%51.6%21.6%————
Matt Dann289:0520.5%2.82.00.40.20.80.41.233–5164.7%†0–0—12–1770.6%†64.7%†66.7%†33.3%†511:13 +2:0728.0%2.4 −0.4
Isaiah Manning1319:3320.5%9.63.31.00.40.41.12.622–4450.0%†18–5036.0%27–3187.1%52.1%†58.1%†33.0%†————
CJ Beaumont279:1920.3%2.62.20.10.20.30.41.19–2437.5%†16–3644.4%†5–1050.0%†55.0%†55.1%†16.7%†518:07 +8:4745.3%6.6 +4.0
Jaxson Ford159:5512.0%3.12.50.50.20.30.92.521–3756.8%†0–10.0%†5–955.6%†55.3%†56.0%†23.7%†————
Team, games with logs · per game31 games80.038.514.92.611.8622–122950.6%255–68637.2%471–65871.6%52.5%56.2%34.4%
Sum of players80.034.514.97.02.611.417.7Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+4.00.00.0+0.5

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$265K
80% Range $96K to $730K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$225K to $285K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
11
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Damon Nicholas Jr.70.7%$45K$14K to $140K16.7%$39K to $49K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kashie Natt68.9%$58K$18K to $175K20.5%$49K to $63K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Po'Boigh King66.4%$13K$2K to $55K7.0%$11K to $14K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Veljko Ilic63.4%$55K$17K to $155K19.0%$47K to $59K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jacob Walker62.8%$14K$2K to $56K7.5%$12K to $16K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jacobe Coleman50.8%$10K$2K to $42K5.3%$9K to $11K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Justin Begg43.6%$18K$4K to $58K7.8%$15K to $19K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Manning20.9%$8K$2K to $27K3.8%$7K to $9K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Matt Dann20.5%$10K$3K to $31K4.2%$8K to $11K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
CJ Beaumont20.0%$7K$2K to $23K3.2%$6K to $7K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaxson Ford12.1%$5K$1K to $15K2.1%$4K to $5K$2KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$265K$96K to $730K100%$225K to $285K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Sam Houston State University (NCAA Division I-FBS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$2,127,419Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$2,127,419
Athletics department expenses$31,955,712
Athletics department revenue$31,968,068

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 31 games, 2,190 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

StatisticTeamOpponents
Points80.076.9
Field goals made28.326.7
Field goals attempted61.859.8
3-pointers made8.28.1
3-pointers attempted22.125.0
Free throws made15.215.4
Free throws attempted21.222.0
Offensive rebounds13.110.9
Defensive rebounds25.423.4
Total rebounds38.534.3
Assists14.913.5
Blocks2.63.4
Turnovers11.811.4
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 217.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 548.
Minutes (derived)200.0

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,4802,4800±12.40
Field goals madeReconciled8778770±4.40
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,9151,9150±9.60
3-pointers madeReconciled2552550±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled6866860±3.40
Free throws madeReconciled4714710±2.40
Free throws attemptedReconciled6586580±3.30
Offensive reboundsNo player split
Defensive reboundsNo player split
Total reboundsResidual shown1,1921,069+123±95.40
AssistsReconciled4614610±2.30
BlocksReconciled82820±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown367352+15±11.00
StealsNo team figure217
Personal foulsNo team figure548
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,2006,186+14.3±124.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Damon Nicholas Jr.70.7%+2.5range +1.2 to +3.9Sufficient evidence
Kashie Natt68.9%+3.4range +1.9 to +4.7Sufficient evidence
Po'Boigh King66.4%-0.6range -1.8 to +0.7Sufficient evidence
Veljko Ilic63.4%+3.4range +2.2 to +4.6Sufficient evidence
Jacob Walker62.8%-0.3range -1.2 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Jacobe Coleman50.8%-0.6range -1.8 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Justin Begg43.6%+0.9range -0.6 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Manning20.9%+0.6range -0.4 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Matt Dann20.5%+1.1range -0.2 to +2.2Sufficient evidence
CJ Beaumont20.0%-0.0range -1.2 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Jaxson Ford12.1%-0.3range -1.0 to +0.5Limited evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+10.7range +9.8 to +11.5Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 100.0% of on-court time. 0 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.4%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value