Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Mississippi Val.

SWAC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 365 · Raw net -29.2 · Tempo 69.6 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-09

All seasons
Record
2–30
2 wins
AdjNet
-30.0β
rank 365 of 365
AdjO
90.6β
rank 364 of 365
AdjD
120.6β
rank 361 of 365
AdjT
68.3β
SOS
-5.8β
rank 336 of 363
NCSOS
4.5β
WAB
-24.5β
rank 363 of 363
RR
-1.2β
Exp. W
3.2β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.90.1364119.3356108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%45.235955.534151.4
TO / 100 poss.21.936117.114516.7
Offensive rebound %26.431335.534630.6
FTA / FGA %33.921450.836235.0
Shooting
3P%29.534637.234633.9
2P%45.635255.331351.7
FT%71.621775.031172.5
Style
3PA / FGA %30.242.539.5
Assists / FGM %52.959.552.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %7.99.09.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %23.331.831.4
2-pointers %55.642.648.8
Free throws %21.225.519.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
9.4
Top Three Share of Minutes
43%
Bench Share of Minutes
36%
Players with Logged Minutes
16

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03UABL 55–10684.8Away0–1
11-07Murray St.L 60–10877.4Away0–2
11-13HawaiiL 56–8866.5—0–3
11-14Utah TechL 75–81 2OT74.3Neutral0–4
11-15ManhattanL 73–8064.2Neutral0–5
11-22CSU BakersfieldL 70–8674.9Away0–6
11-25Texas A&ML 84–12086.4Away0–7
12-03ULML 52–6665.0Away0–8
12-08Kansas St.L 49–10876.1Away0–9
12-16Tarleton St.L 64–8875.1Home0–10
12-19Florida St.L 49–9674.4Away0–11
12-22West VirginiaL 51–8658.6Away0–12
12-29OklahomaL 69–9361.3Away0–13
01-03Alabama St.L 69–8973.1Home0–14
01-05Alabama A&ML 51–7170.4Home0–15
01-10Prairie ViewL 69–7071.1Away0–16
01-12Texas SouthernL 51–8468.2Away0–17
01-17Bethune-CookmanL 63–7966.5Home0–18
01-19Florida A&ML 48–6264.4Home0–19
01-28Southern U.L 69–8069.3Away0–20
01-31Ark.-Pine BluffL 70–7871.2Home0–21
02-07Jackson St.L 81–9775.5Home0–22
02-09AlcornL 66–7458.7Home0–23
02-14Alabama A&ML 65–7263.9Away0–24
02-16Alabama St.L 55–9272.3Away0–25
02-19Prairie ViewL 62–7267.9Home0–26
02-21Texas SouthernW 72–7168.4Home1–26
02-23GramblingL 62–8378.9Away1–27
02-28Ark.-Pine BluffW 70–6969.7Away2–27
03-03AlcornL 64–6764.6Away2–28
03-05Jackson St.L 77–8566.0Away2–29
03-09GramblingL 52–7766.2Neutral2–30

Roster · 16 players

Player logs in 31 of 32 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groupsMinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Michael James3036:0083.7%21.33.42.81.80.03.02.4153–29851.3%72–21833.0%118–13090.8%50.6%55.8%25.2%531:49 −4:1179.6%19.8 −1.5
Patrick Punch2830:0765.4%8.23.11.61.10.12.02.844–11837.3%26–9826.5%64–9071.1%38.4%45.0%41.7%528:47 −1:2072.0%9.0 +0.8
Daniel Mayfield2629:2459.3%13.35.81.20.90.82.03.0114–25345.1%18–5731.6%64–8080.0%45.5%50.1%25.8%526:09 −3:1565.4%11.8 −1.5
X’Zaevion Barnett2628:1456.9%4.64.12.71.30.22.12.329–7936.7%†5–2025.0%†47–8853.4%36.9%†43.6%†88.9%†521:38 −6:3554.1%1.8 −2.8
Mussa Mzein3118:1844.0%3.52.30.60.50.21.33.044–9645.8%2–633.3%†15–2755.6%46.1%47.9%26.5%514:08 −4:1035.3%4.2 +0.7
Lamont Sams1727:5836.8%8.64.41.40.61.11.62.739–7452.7%14–4928.6%†26–3281.3%48.8%53.3%26.0%226:50 −1:0726.8%8.5 −0.1
Xzayvion Childress1330:3530.8%8.22.52.40.50.22.52.523–4847.9%†11–3729.7%†28–3287.5%46.5%†54.0%†37.6%†533:48 +3:1384.5%6.8 −1.4
Delkedric Holmes1525:3229.7%5.11.52.51.30.12.72.325–7035.7%†3–1816.7%†18–2281.8%†33.5%†39.4%†25.0%†————
Tyrone Iroghama2811:5926.0%2.52.20.20.30.31.02.226–5547.3%†0–0—17–4240.5%47.3%†47.0%†76.4%†57:47 −4:1219.4%2.2 −0.3
Chance Sutton2711:5925.1%1.62.10.20.40.30.91.718–4143.9%†0–0—8–1650.0%†43.9%†45.8%†39.0%†45:26 −6:3310.9%1.3 −0.4
Samuel Murray1313:2513.5%4.23.20.70.40.20.42.720–3655.6%†1–714.3%†12–2060.0%†50.0%†53.1%†46.5%†414:12 +0:4728.4%2.3 −2.0
Jonathan PaceUnder 100 minutes144:515.3%1.11.20.10.00.20.11.47–1258.3%†0–0—2–633.3%†58.3%†54.6%†50.0%†23:02 −1:493.0%3.0 +1.9
Antonio SiskFew gamesUnder 100 minutes218:582.9%1.01.51.01.00.03.51.51–425.0%†0–30.0%†0–0—14.3%†14.3%†0.0%†————
George Ivory IIIFew gamesUnder 100 minutes29:321.5%5.00.50.50.50.50.52.02–450.0%†2–366.7%†0–0—71.4%†71.4%†0.0%†29:32 0:009.5%5.0 0.0
PJ McDonaldFew gamesUnder 100 minutes23:350.6%0.00.00.50.00.00.51.50–10.0%†0–0—0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†23:35 0:003.6%0.0 0.0
Derrick SingletonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes12:340.2%0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00–0—0–0—0–0————12:34 0:001.3%0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per game31 games63.630.111.8not published2.515.5not published545–118945.8%154–51629.8%419–58571.6%45.5%50.2%34.3%
Sum of players63.626.711.87.12.514.721.5Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.40.0not published0.0+0.8not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$125K
80% Range $44K to $330K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$120K to $135K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
15
4 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Michael James88.3%$4K$0 to $35K1.6%$4K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Patrick Punch69.2%$3K$0 to $20K1.4%$2K to $3K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Daniel Mayfield61.2%$3K$0 to $30K1.7%$3K to $4K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
X’Zaevion Barnett60.8%$3K$0 to $21K1.4%$3K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mussa Mzein44.6%$3K$0 to $22K1.4%$3K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Lamont Sams39.5%$5K$0 to $32K8.8%$5K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Delkedric Holmes30.4%$2K$0 to $12K1.1%$2K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Xzayvion Childress30.2%$12K$1K to $66K10.1%$12K to $13K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tyrone Iroghama27.0%$2K$0 to $13K1.1%$2K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chance Sutton26.3%$2K$0 to $9K1.1%$2K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Samuel Murray11.6%$21K$3K to $160K12.6%$20K to $23K$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jonathan Pace5.4%$1K$0 to $2K0.7%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Antonio Sisk3.9%$1K$0 to $2K0.7%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
George Ivory III1.5%$1K$0 to $2K0.7%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
PJ McDonald0.1%$1K$0 to $2K0.7%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$125K$44K to $330K100%$120K to $135K—

1 rostered player has no figure: no recorded possessions or no matched player record.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Mississippi Valley State University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$993,877
Men's basketball expenses$717,325
Athletics department expenses$5,281,853
Athletics department revenue$5,576,233

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 32 games, 2,245 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points63.283.7
Field goals made22.526.7
Field goals attempted55.256.1
3-pointers made4.98.9
3-pointers attempted16.723.8
Free throws made13.421.4
Free throws attempted18.728.5
Offensive rebounds9.111.6
Defensive rebounds21.125.4
Total rebounds30.237.0
Assists11.915.9
Blocks2.63.5
Turnovers15.412.0
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 219.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 668.
Minutes (derived)201.6not published

31 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled1,9711,9710±9.952
Field goals madeReconciled6996990±3.520
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,7051,7050±8.560
3-pointers madeReconciled1541540±2.03
3-pointers attemptedReconciled5165160±2.617
Free throws madeReconciled4194190±2.19
Free throws attemptedReconciled5855850±2.913
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown933829+104±74.633
AssistsReconciled3663660±2.014
BlocksReconciled79790±2.03
TurnoversResidual shown482457+25±14.510
StealsNo team figurenot published219not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published668not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,2506,212+37.7±125.0200

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Michael James88.3%-4.1range -5.2 to -2.8Sufficient evidence
Patrick Punch69.2%-5.3range -6.4 to -3.7Sufficient evidence
Daniel Mayfield61.2%-3.5range -4.8 to -2.1Sufficient evidence
X’Zaevion Barnett60.8%-4.6range -5.9 to -3.2Sufficient evidence
Mussa Mzein44.6%-3.6range -5.0 to -2.2Sufficient evidence
Lamont Sams39.5%-2.2range -3.1 to -1.2Sufficient evidence
Delkedric Holmes30.4%-4.4range -5.4 to -3.2Sufficient evidence
Xzayvion Childress30.2%-1.0range -2.0 to -0.1Sufficient evidence
Tyrone Iroghama27.0%-3.8range -5.0 to -2.5Sufficient evidence
Chance Sutton26.3%-5.1range -6.1 to -3.8Sufficient evidence
Samuel Murray11.6%+0.2range -0.3 to +0.6Limited evidence
Jonathan Pace5.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Antonio Sisk3.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
George Ivory III1.5%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
PJ McDonald0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+5.5range +4.9 to +6.4Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 97.8% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.3%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value