Daniel Mayfield
Mississippi Val. · 2025–26 · 26 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
764:23 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 26
- Minutes per game
- 29:24
- Points per game
- 13.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.8 / 1.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.3 | 5.8 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.1 | 8.0 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 4.1 |
| Season totals | 346 | 152 | 31 | 24 | 22 | 52 | 78 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 132–310 | 42.6% | 11.9 | 16.2 |
| 2P | 114–253 | 45.1% | 9.7 | 13.2 |
| 3P | 18–57 | 31.6% | 2.2 | 3.0 |
| FT | 64–80 | 80.0% | 3.1 | 4.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.5% | 50.1% | 18.4% | 25.8% | 0.60 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
MS Valley St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $3K
- 80% range $0 to $30K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.7%
- team pool $125K, 80% range $44K to $330K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $3K to $4K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 61.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
MS Valley St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | MS Valley St | $3Kspeculative | $0 to $30K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -3.5 | -4.8 to -2.1 | Sufficient evidence | -2.1 | -1.4 | +1.0range +0.7 to +1.2 | 2,499 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 26:09 | 29:24 | 5:25–41:53 | |
| Points | 11.8 | 13.3 | 2.0–30.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 43.2% | 43.4% | 9.1%–71.9% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-09 | Grambling | L 52–77 | 21:04 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2026-03-05 | Jackson St. | L 77–85 | 22:46 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 6-8 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Alcorn | L 64–67 | 28:01 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6-12 | 1-2 | 5-7 | 54.2% |
| 2026-02-28 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | W 70–69 | 35:58 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-17 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 41.2% |
| 2026-02-23 | Grambling | L 62–83 | 22:54 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 56.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Texas Southern | W 72–71 | 37:40 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-15 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 56.7% |
| 2026-02-19 | Prairie View | L 62–72 | 31:28 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-10 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-16 | Alabama St. | L 55–92 | 22:46 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5-13 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 42.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | Alabama A&M | L 65–72 | 39:53 | 16 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 6-16 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 40.6% |
| 2026-02-09 | Alcorn | L 66–74 | 37:16 | 13 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-18 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 27.8% |
| 2026-02-07 | Jackson St. | L 81–97 | 37:54 | 30 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 12-20 | 1-4 | 5-5 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Ark.-Pine Bluff | L 70–78 | 24:01 | 15 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5-10 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Southern U. | L 69–80 | 38:33 | 18 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 8-16 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 53.1% |
| 2026-01-19 | Florida A&M | L 48–62 | 33:16 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3-11 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 31.8% |
| 2026-01-17 | Bethune-Cookman | L 63–79 | 28:11 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Prairie View | L 69–70 | 32:12 | 20 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8-13 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 65.4% |
| 2026-01-05 | Alabama A&M | L 51–71 | 25:39 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3-9 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 38.9% |
| 2026-01-03 | Alabama St. | L 69–89 | 5:25 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-08 | Kansas St. | L 49–108 | 32:03 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1-11 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 9.1% |
| 2025-11-25 | Texas A&M | L 84–120 | 24:54 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 21.4% |
| 2025-11-22 | CSU Bakersfield | L 70–86 | 32:52 | 22 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9-18 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Manhattan | L 73–80 | 37:44 | 28 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 11-16 | 1-1 | 5-5 | 71.9% |
| 2025-11-14 | Utah Tech | L 75–81 | 41:53 | 19 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8-13 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 65.4% |
| 2025-11-13 | Hawaii | L 56–88 | 17:31 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 31.3% |
| 2025-11-07 | Murray St. | L 60–108 | 33:33 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5-18 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-03 | UAB | L 55–106 | 18:56 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 16.7% |