Virginia Tech

ACC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 89 · Raw net 5.6 · Tempo 68.0 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-10

Record: 19–13; 19 wins
AdjNet: 10.7β; rank 59 of 365
AdjO: 114.5β; rank 65 of 365
AdjD: 103.8β; rank 73 of 365
AdjT: 68.2β
SOS: 6.8β; rank 61 of 363
NCSOS: -1.7β
WAB: -0.8β; rank 58 of 363
RR: 1.0β
Exp. W: 18.0β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	112.889	107.2138	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.2134	50.8147	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	14.961	17.2134	16.7
Offensive rebound %	31.9129	32.6284	30.6
FTA / FGA %	34.0208	28.841	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.587	30.625	33.9
2P%	51.5189	54.1279	51.7
FT%	74.3117	74.3283	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	39.7	39.6	39.5
Assists / FGM %	52.4	47.0	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.7	9.4	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	32.6	29.5	31.4
2-pointers %	47.9	53.1	48.8
Free throws %	19.5	17.4	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes: 44%
Bench Share of Minutes: 32%
Players with Logged Minutes: 11

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Charleston So.	W 98–67	78.0	Home	1–0
11-08	Providence	W 107–101 1OT	89.2	Neutral	2–0
11-12	Saint Joseph's	W 94–59	74.0	Home	3–0
11-16	Charlotte	W 84–76	66.3	Home	4–0
11-19	Bryant	W 78–61	69.0	Home	5–0
11-26	Colorado St.	W 66–64	62.2	Neutral	6–0
11-27	Saint Mary's (CA)	L 66–77	67.8	Neutral	6–1
11-28	VCU	L 68–86	70.7	Neutral	6–2
12-02	South Carolina	W 86–83 1OT	77.6	Away	7–2
12-06	George Mason	W 73–62	64.4	Home	8–2
12-11	Western Caro.	W 96–74	72.6	Home	9–2
12-14	UMES	W 82–53	64.9	Home	10–2
12-20	Elon	W 82–81 1OT	69.5	Home	11–2
12-31	Virginia	W 95–85 3OT	95.8	Home	12–2
01-03	Wake Forest	L 78–81	74.2	Away	12–3
01-07	Stanford	L 68–69	60.1	Home	12–4
01-10	California	W 78–75	66.8	Home	13–4
01-14	SMU	L 76–77	69.2	Away	13–5
01-17	Notre Dame	W 89–76	71.1	Home	14–5
01-21	Syracuse	W 76–74	70.4	Away	15–5
01-24	Louisville	L 71–85	71.0	Away	15–6
01-27	Georgia Tech	W 71–65	70.2	Home	16–6
01-31	Duke	L 58–72	57.6	Home	16–7
02-07	NC State	L 73–82	72.3	Away	16–8
02-11	Clemson	W 76–66	64.9	Away	17–8
02-14	Florida St.	L 69–92	64.6	Home	17–9
02-17	Miami (FL)	L 66–67	62.8	Away	17–10
02-21	Wake Forest	W 82–63	60.6	Home	18–10
02-28	North Carolina	L 82–89	69.2	Away	18–11
03-03	Boston College	W 72–63	66.2	Home	19–11
03-07	Virginia	L 72–76	66.3	Away	19–12
03-10	Wake Forest	L 89–95 1OT	75.0	Neutral	19–13

Roster · 11 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Ben Hammond	32	31:16	76.1%	423	73	103	64	3	46	71	91–206	44.2%	44–102	43.1%	109–126	86.5%	51.0%	58.2%	40.9%	5	35:39 +4:22	86.9%	16.6 +3.4
Neoklis Avdalas	31	31:39	74.6%	375	96	142	18	17	69	41	80–178	44.9%	49–156	31.4%	68–101	67.3%	46.0%	49.5%	30.2%	5	31:32 −0:07	76.9%	13.0 +0.9
Amani Hansberry	30	30:40	70.0%	430	221	72	44	21	62	92	125–227	55.1%	34–96	35.4%	78–106	73.6%	54.5%	58.2%	32.8%	4	25:46 −4:54	50.3%	11.8 −2.6
Jailen Bedford	31	26:03	61.4%	351	101	40	17	2	34	60	75–172	43.6%	52–145	35.9%	45–62	72.6%	48.3%	51.0%	19.6%	5	28:23 +2:20	69.2%	10.8 −0.5
Jaden Schutt	32	24:12	58.9%	246	52	30	17	0	13	58	13–34	38.2%	65–169	38.5%	25–29	86.2%	54.4%	57.0%	14.3%	5	21:11 −3:01	51.7%	4.8 −2.9
Tobi Lawal	23	29:03	50.8%	282	195	14	7	26	41	64	78–118	66.1%	12–48	25.0%†	90–118	76.3%	57.8%	64.7%	71.1%	5	32:01 +2:59	78.1%	14.6 +2.3
Christian Gurdak	31	17:04	40.2%	173	136	10	10	12	18	55	67–106	63.2%	0–0	—	39–56	69.6%	63.2%	66.2%	52.8%	5	17:53 +0:49	43.6%	5.4 −0.2
Tyler Johnson	17	26:06	33.7%	136	77	27	19	10	12	49	32–51	62.7%†	17–41	41.5%†	21–31	67.7%	62.5%†	64.4%†	33.7%†	4	11:36 −14:30	22.7%	3.3 −4.8
Antonio Dorn	24	8:47	16.0%	62	44	10	2	5	12	37	27–42	64.3%†	0–0	—	8–16	50.0%†	64.3%†	63.2%†	38.1%†	5	6:41 −2:06	16.3%	1.8 −0.8
Izaiah Pasha	18	8:10	11.2%	36	15	12	6	4	11	9	13–33	39.4%†	1–7	14.3%†	7–13	53.8%†	36.3%†	39.4%†	32.5%†	1	6:39 −1:31	3.2%	2.0 0.0
Sin'Cere JonesUnder 100 minutes	11	6:22	5.3%	7	15	0	1	2	1	12	3–5	60.0%†	0–7	0.0%†	1–3	33.3%†	25.0%†	26.3%†	25.0%†	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · season totals	32 games			2521	1113	460	not published	102	334	not published	604–1172	51.5%	274–771	35.5%	491–661	74.3%	52.2%	56.4%	34.0%
Sum of players				2521	1025	460	205	102	319	548	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+88	0	not published	0	+15	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.55M; 80% Range $2.55M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.55M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 11; 1 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Neoklis Avdalas	75.2%	$745K	$480K to $1.20M	20.4%	$745K in all four	$31K	Sufficient evidence
Ben Hammond	74.3%	$400K	$135K to $645K	12.2%	$400K in all four	$31K	Sufficient evidence
Amani Hansberry	69.4%	$765K	$490K to $1.35M	21.1%	$765K in all four	$31K	Sufficient evidence
Jailen Bedford	61.4%	$130K	$24K to $355K	3.9%	$130K in all four	$31K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaden Schutt	59.1%	$355K	$135K to $570K	10.5%	$355K in all four	$31K	Sufficient evidence
Tobi Lawal	52.2%	$160K	$28K to $340K	4.8%	$160K in all four	$31K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Christian Gurdak	40.8%	$405K	$255K to $660K	10.9%	$405K in all four	$31K	Sufficient evidence
Tyler Johnson	34.8%	$275K	$160K to $430K	7.7%	$275K in all four	$31K	Sufficient evidence
Antonio Dorn	15.6%	$98K	$42K to $165K	2.9%	$98K in all four	$31K	Sufficient evidence
Izaiah Pasha	11.3%	$54K	$24K to $99K	1.5%	$54K in all four	$31K	Limited evidence
Sin'Cere Jones	5.8%	$31K	$18K to $51K	0.9%	$31K in all four	$31K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.55M	$2.55M to $4.95M	100%	$3.55M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$8,485,407
Men's basketball expenses	$9,504,271
Athletics department expenses	$148,984,818
Athletics department revenue	$151,623,889

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 32 games, 2,234 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,521	2,396
Field goals made	878	872
Field goals attempted	1,943	1,947
3-pointers made	274	236
3-pointers attempted	771	771
Free throws made	491	416
Free throws attempted	661	560
Offensive rebounds	353	367
Defensive rebounds	760	754
Total rebounds	1,113	1,121
Assists	460	410
Blocks	102	110
Turnovers	334	385
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 205.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 548.
Minutes (derived)	6,575	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,521	2,521	0	±12.6	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	878	878	0	±4.4	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,943	1,943	0	±9.7	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	274	274	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	771	771	0	±3.9	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	491	491	0	±2.5	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	661	661	0	±3.3	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Reconciled	1,113	1,025	+88	±89.0	0
Assists	Reconciled	460	460	0	±2.3	0
Blocks	Reconciled	102	102	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	334	319	+15	±10.0	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	205	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	548	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,575	6,553	+22.4	±131.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Neoklis Avdalas	75.2%	+3.6range +2.3 to +4.9Sufficient evidence
Ben Hammond	74.3%	+1.2range +0.3 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Amani Hansberry	69.4%	+4.1range +3.1 to +5.3Sufficient evidence
Jailen Bedford	61.4%	-1.5range -3.2 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Jaden Schutt	59.1%	+1.6range +0.4 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Tobi Lawal	52.2%	-0.7range -1.9 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Christian Gurdak	40.8%	+3.5range +2.3 to +4.9Sufficient evidence
Tyler Johnson	34.8%	+2.4range +1.3 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Antonio Dorn	15.6%	+0.9range -0.2 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Izaiah Pasha	11.3%	-1.1range -2.0 to -0.1Limited evidence
Sin'Cere Jones	5.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +11.1range +10.3 to +12.0Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.8% of on-court time. 1 without a value (under 300 possessions) holds 1.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.3%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value