Michigan

B10 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 3 · Raw net 24.9 · Tempo 71.4 · 40 Division I games · Through 2026-04-06

Record: 37–3; 37 wins
AdjNet: 33.7β; rank 1 of 365
AdjO: 125.1β; rank 3 of 365
AdjD: 91.5β; rank 1 of 365
AdjT: 71.5β
SOS: 13.2β; rank 1 of 363
NCSOS: 9.6β
WAB: 16.9β; rank 1 of 363
RR: 2.7β
Exp. W: 34.3β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	121.96	97.07	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	58.38	44.61	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	16.3158	15.1273	16.7
Offensive rebound %	34.754	28.270	30.6
FTA / FGA %	38.0101	26.014	35.0
Shooting
3P%	36.833	30.418	33.9
2P%	60.65	43.82	51.7
FT%	74.891	74.1268	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	41.4	42.3	39.5
Assists / FGM %	61.0	46.7	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	16.4	8.6	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	31.5	35.6	31.4
2-pointers %	48.9	46.6	48.8
Free throws %	19.6	17.8	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.9
Top Three Share of Minutes: 41%
Bench Share of Minutes: 36%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Oakland	W 121–78	77.7	Home	1–0
11-11	Wake Forest	W 85–84 1OT	86.3	Neutral	2–0
11-14	TCU	W 67–63	69.8	Away	3–0
11-19	Middle Tenn.	W 86–61	78.5	Home	4–0
11-24	San Diego St.	W 94–54	75.5	Neutral	5–0
11-25	Auburn	W 102–72	71.1	Neutral	6–0
11-26	Gonzaga	W 101–61	80.5	Neutral	7–0
12-06	Rutgers	W 101–60	72.7	Home	8–0
12-09	Villanova	W 89–61	77.8	Home	9–0
12-13	Maryland	W 101–83	69.8	Away	10–0
12-21	La Salle	W 102–50	74.7	Home	11–0
12-29	McNeese	W 112–71	83.4	Home	12–0
01-02	Southern California	W 96–66	83.6	Home	13–0
01-06	Penn St.	W 74–72	71.5	Away	14–0
01-10	Wisconsin	L 88–91	72.2	Home	14–1
01-14	Washington	W 82–72	71.2	Away	15–1
01-17	Oregon	W 81–71	67.4	Away	16–1
01-20	Indiana	W 86–72	70.1	Home	17–1
01-23	Ohio St.	W 74–62	65.1	Home	18–1
01-27	Nebraska	W 75–72	71.4	Home	19–1
01-30	Michigan St.	W 83–71	72.6	Away	20–1
02-05	Penn St.	W 110–69	71.2	Home	21–1
02-08	Ohio St.	W 82–61	66.0	Away	22–1
02-11	Northwestern	W 87–75	74.7	Away	23–1
02-14	UCLA	W 86–56	64.0	Home	24–1
02-17	Purdue	W 91–80	69.7	Away	25–1
02-21	Duke	L 63–68	61.8	Neutral	25–2
02-24	Minnesota	W 77–67	64.6	Home	26–2
02-27	Illinois	W 84–70	66.4	Away	27–2
03-05	Iowa	W 71–68	65.1	Away	28–2
03-08	Michigan St.	W 90–80	71.1	Home	29–2
03-13	Ohio St.	W 71–67	67.0	Neutral	30–2
03-14	Wisconsin	W 68–65	67.5	Neutral	31–2
03-15	Purdue	L 72–80	62.7	Neutral	31–3
03-19	Howard	W 101–80	71.3	—	32–3
03-21	Saint Louis	W 95–72	70.5	—	33–3
03-27	Alabama	W 90–77	71.1	—	34–3
03-29	Tennessee	W 95–62	75.3	—	35–3
04-04	Arizona	W 91–73	78.0	—	36–3
04-06	UConn	W 69–63	65.4	—	37–3

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 40 of 40 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Yaxel Lendeborg	40	30:02	74.8%	603	271	129	45	49	42	68	133–208	63.9%	67–180	37.2%	136–165	82.4%	60.2%	65.5%	42.5%	5	30:20 +0:18	75.8%	19.8 +4.7
Elliot Cadeau	40	27:11	67.7%	420	109	234	34	8	96	87	71–158	44.9%	65–173	37.6%	83–117	70.9%	50.9%	54.9%	35.3%	5	33:41 +6:30	84.2%	13.8 +3.3
Morez Johnson Jr.	40	24:59	62.3%	524	293	48	27	44	53	94	183–278	65.8%	12–35	34.3%†	122–156	78.2%	64.2%	68.7%	49.8%	5	25:08 +0:09	62.8%	11.2 −1.9
Aday Mara	40	23:55	59.6%	484	270	97	14	103	79	89	198–291	68.0%	3–10	30.0%†	79–140	56.4%	67.3%	66.7%	46.5%	5	26:36 +2:42	66.5%	13.8 +1.7
Trey McKenney	40	21:48	54.3%	397	110	35	16	2	36	57	58–99	58.6%	68–174	39.1%	77–86	89.5%	58.6%	63.9%	31.5%	5	25:06 +3:18	62.8%	12.4 +2.5
Roddy Gayle Jr.	39	20:58	51.0%	286	128	52	28	20	50	62	80–152	52.6%	21–66	31.8%	63–84	75.0%	51.1%	56.1%	38.5%	5	24:47 +3:48	61.9%	8.0 +0.7
Nimari Burnett	40	19:48	49.3%	329	110	47	23	4	26	59	52–87	59.8%	60–160	37.5%	45–58	77.6%	57.5%	60.4%	23.5%	5	21:06 +1:18	52.7%	6.6 −1.6
Will Tschetter	40	13:30	33.6%	141	76	25	4	4	12	47	12–25	48.0%	29–84	34.5%	30–33	90.9%	50.9%	57.1%	30.3%	5	10:34 −2:56	26.4%	0.8 −2.7
L.J. Cason	28	18:40	32.6%	234	52	66	26	0	48	24	48–79	60.8%	33–82	40.2%	39–55	70.9%	60.6%	63.2%	34.2%	—	—	—	—
Oscar GoodmanUnder 100 minutes	16	5:08	5.1%	22	20	7	1	3	4	12	10–18	55.6%†	0–6	0.0%†	2–5	40.0%†	41.7%†	42.0%†	20.8%†	3	1:30 −3:38	2.2%	1.7 +0.3
Malick KordelUnder 100 minutes	14	4:02	3.5%	17	21	2	1	5	2	11	8–13	61.5%†	0–1	0.0%†	1–5	20.0%†	57.1%†	52.5%†	35.7%†	2	0:40 −3:22	0.7%	0.0 −1.2
Winters GradyFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	5:00	2.8%	26	10	2	2	0	6	7	1–1	100.0%†	6–19	31.6%†	6–7	85.7%†	50.0%†	56.3%†	35.0%†	—	—	—	—
Charlie MayFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	2:08	1.1%	7	3	1	1	0	3	4	0–1	0.0%†	2–3	66.7%†	1–2	50.0%†	75.0%†	71.7%†	50.0%†	3	1:10 −0:58	1.8%	1.0 +0.1
Howard Eisley Jr.Few gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	1:05	0.6%	3	1	0	1	0	0	0	0–0	—	1–5	20.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	30.0%†	25.5%†	40.0%†	3	1:00 −0:04	1.5%	0.0 −0.3
Team, games with logs · season totals	40 games			3493	1603	745	not published	242	468	not published	854–1410	60.6%	367–998	36.8%	684–915	74.8%	58.3%	62.1%	38.0%
Sum of players				3493	1474	745	223	242	457	621	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+129	0	not published	0	+11	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.60M; 80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.60M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 5 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Yaxel Lendeborg	75.0%	$940K	$600K to $1.65M	25.4%	$940K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Elliot Cadeau	68.4%	$465K	$295K to $680K	13.2%	$465K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Morez Johnson Jr.	63.0%	$450K	$295K to $655K	12.7%	$450K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Aday Mara	60.2%	$470K	$310K to $700K	13.0%	$470K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Trey McKenney	53.9%	$370K	$230K to $550K	10.5%	$370K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Roddy Gayle Jr.	50.7%	$170K	$51K to $310K	4.9%	$170K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Nimari Burnett	50.1%	$215K	$84K to $355K	6.2%	$215K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Will Tschetter	33.5%	$150K	$56K to $250K	4.3%	$150K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
L.J. Cason	32.2%	$150K	$70K to $235K	4.4%	$150K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Oscar Goodman	5.0%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Malick Kordel	3.5%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Winters Grady	2.7%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Charlie May	1.1%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Howard Eisley Jr.	0.5%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.60M	$2.60M to $4.95M	100%	$3.60M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$21,209,886
Men's basketball expenses	$14,358,515
Athletics department expenses	$222,088,909
Athletics department revenue	$236,376,759

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 40 games, 2,866 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	3,493	2,780
Field goals made	1,221	978
Field goals attempted	2,408	2,563
3-pointers made	367	330
3-pointers attempted	998	1,085
Free throws made	684	494
Free throws attempted	915	667
Offensive rebounds	433	459
Defensive rebounds	1,170	815
Total rebounds	1,603	1,274
Assists	745	457
Blocks	242	121
Turnovers	468	434
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 223.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 621.
Minutes (derived)	8,025	not published

40 of 40 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	3,493	3,493	0	±17.5	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	1,221	1,221	0	±6.1	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,408	2,408	0	±12.0	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	367	367	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	998	998	0	±5.0	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	684	684	0	±3.4	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	915	915	0	±4.6	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,603	1,474	+129	±128.2	0
Assists	Reconciled	745	745	0	±3.7	0
Blocks	Reconciled	242	242	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Reconciled	468	457	+11	±14.0	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	223	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	621	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	8,025	7,999	+25.6	±160.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Yaxel Lendeborg	75.0%	+10.8range +8.8 to +12.1Sufficient evidence
Elliot Cadeau	68.4%	+5.9range +4.5 to +7.4Sufficient evidence
Morez Johnson Jr.	63.0%	+6.3range +4.8 to +7.7Sufficient evidence
Aday Mara	60.2%	+6.9range +5.6 to +8.0Sufficient evidence
Trey McKenney	53.9%	+6.1range +4.4 to +7.5Sufficient evidence
Roddy Gayle Jr.	50.7%	+2.0range +0.5 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Nimari Burnett	50.1%	+3.2range +1.4 to +4.6Sufficient evidence
Will Tschetter	33.5%	+3.0range +1.3 to +4.6Sufficient evidence
L.J. Cason	32.2%	+3.3range +2.2 to +4.2Sufficient evidence
Oscar Goodman	5.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Malick Kordel	3.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Winters Grady	2.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Charlie May	1.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Howard Eisley Jr.	0.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +14.9range +13.9 to +15.7Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 97.4% of on-court time. 5 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.6%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value