Indiana

B10 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 59 · Raw net 8.9 · Tempo 66.6 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-11

Record: 18–14; 18 wins
AdjNet: 14.3β; rank 41 of 365
AdjO: 117.6β; rank 41 of 365
AdjD: 103.3β; rank 61 of 365
AdjT: 67.3β
SOS: 7.9β; rank 39 of 363
NCSOS: -3.6β
WAB: -1.3β; rank 62 of 363
RR: -1.6β
Exp. W: 19.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	116.048	107.1131	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	56.122	49.067	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.170	15.1281	16.7
Offensive rebound %	26.9301	29.3123	30.6
FTA / FGA %	35.0179	37.0236	35.0
Shooting
3P%	34.7139	33.1128	33.9
2P%	60.36	48.654	51.7
FT%	78.017	75.8339	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	50.5	36.8	39.5
Assists / FGM %	62.7	48.9	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	7.4	10.1	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	37.7	29.0	31.4
2-pointers %	42.8	48.8	48.8
Free throws %	19.6	22.3	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.0
Top Three Share of Minutes: 49%
Bench Share of Minutes: 30%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-05	Alabama A&M	W 98–51	70.3	Home	1–0
11-09	Marquette	W 100–77	75.5	Neutral	2–0
11-12	Milwaukee	W 101–70	70.7	Home	3–0
11-16	UIW	W 69–61	64.3	Home	4–0
11-20	Lindenwood	W 73–53	71.2	Home	5–0
11-25	Kansas St.	W 86–69	76.0	Home	6–0
11-29	Bethune-Cookman	W 100–56	71.0	Home	7–0
12-03	Minnesota	L 64–73	66.2	Away	7–1
12-06	Louisville	L 78–87	74.2	Neutral	7–2
12-09	Penn St.	W 113–72	73.3	Home	8–2
12-13	Kentucky	L 60–72	66.9	Away	8–3
12-20	Chicago St.	W 78–58	68.7	Home	9–3
12-22	Siena	W 81–60	68.8	Home	10–3
01-04	Washington	W 90–80	63.7	Home	11–3
01-07	Maryland	W 84–66	68.7	Away	12–3
01-10	Nebraska	L 77–83	66.9	Home	12–4
01-13	Michigan St.	L 60–81	64.8	Away	12–5
01-17	Iowa	L 57–74	57.5	Home	12–6
01-20	Michigan	L 72–86	70.1	Away	12–7
01-23	Rutgers	W 82–59	59.0	Away	13–7
01-27	Purdue	W 72–67	61.6	Home	14–7
01-31	UCLA	W 98–97 2OT	88.6	Away	15–7
02-03	Southern California	L 75–81	72.7	Away	15–8
02-07	Wisconsin	W 78–77 1OT	68.4	Home	16–8
02-09	Oregon	W 92–74	66.3	Home	17–8
02-15	Illinois	L 51–71	56.6	Away	17–9
02-20	Purdue	L 64–93	63.5	Away	17–10
02-24	Northwestern	L 68–72	61.1	Home	17–11
03-01	Michigan St.	L 64–77	60.1	Home	17–12
03-04	Minnesota	W 77–47	61.3	Home	18–12
03-07	Ohio St.	L 78–91	67.9	Away	18–13
03-11	Northwestern	L 61–74	60.7	Neutral	18–14

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Tucker DeVries	32	34:11	84.5%	13.7	5.3	3.3	1.1	0.6	1.5	2.5	62–117	53.0%	82–246	33.3%	67–78	85.9%	51.0%	55.0%	21.5%	5	37:32 +3:21	93.8%	13.4 −0.3
Lamar Wilkerson	32	33:55	83.8%	20.9	3.5	2.4	1.0	0.2	1.6	2.3	123–215	57.2%	104–275	37.8%	111–125	88.8%	56.9%	61.4%	25.5%	5	35:46 +1:51	89.4%	19.6 −1.3
Conor Enright	32	30:00	74.1%	4.6	3.0	4.6	0.6	0.0	1.2	3.0	23–46	50.0%	26–75	34.7%	23–29	79.3%	51.2%	54.9%	24.0%	5	29:42 −0:19	74.2%	4.4 −0.2
Nick Dorn	30	23:09	53.6%	8.1	2.3	0.3	0.3	0.1	0.7	1.7	12–20	60.0%	60–158	38.0%	40–46	87.0%	57.3%	61.5%	25.8%	5	24:50 +1:41	62.1%	6.4 −1.7
Sam Alexis	32	21:12	52.4%	8.8	4.8	1.2	0.3	1.2	1.0	2.4	112–158	70.9%	2–8	25.0%†	50–69	72.5%	69.3%	71.3%	41.6%	5	24:53 +3:42	62.2%	12.8 +4.1
Tayton Conerway	29	21:19	47.7%	9.5	2.8	3.3	1.1	0.2	2.0	2.1	83–118	70.3%	18–62	29.0%	56–76	73.7%	61.1%	64.7%	42.2%	5	12:24 −8:55	31.0%	6.4 −3.1
Reed Bailey	32	19:09	47.3%	8.3	3.4	1.1	0.2	0.3	0.9	2.3	76–131	58.0%	1–4	25.0%†	112–148	75.7%	57.4%	66.7%	109.6%	5	17:57 −1:12	44.9%	4.6 −3.7
Trent Sisley	30	12:55	29.9%	4.2	2.8	0.4	0.1	0.1	0.4	1.2	33–59	55.9%	13–48	27.1%†	21–39	53.8%	49.1%	50.7%	36.4%	3	4:53 −8:02	7.3%	0.7 −3.5
Jasai Miles	26	9:33	19.2%	1.6	1.9	0.4	0.0	0.1	0.5	1.3	8–16	50.0%†	6–25	24.0%†	7–14	50.0%†	41.5%†	43.5%†	34.1%†	5	11:34 +2:02	28.9%	1.6 0.0
Aleksa RisticUnder 100 minutes	12	2:19	2.1%	0.5	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.2	0.3	0–2	0.0%†	2–3	66.7%†	0–1	0.0%†	60.0%†	55.1%†	20.0%†	2	1:06 −1:13	1.1%	0.0 −0.5
Ian StephensUnder 100 minutes	12	1:27	1.3%	0.3	0.1	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	2–2	100.0%†	100.0%†	106.4%†	200.0%†	2	1:06 −0:21	1.1%	0.0 −0.3
Drew SnivelyUnder 100 minutes	10	1:24	1.1%	0.4	0.4	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.1	0.0	2–4	50.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	40.0%†	40.0%†	0.0%†	2	0:44 −0:40	0.7%	0.0 −0.4
Tryce GrensingUnder 100 minutes	11	1:12	1.0%	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.2	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	2	1:06 −0:06	1.1%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per game	32 games			78.2	32.4	16.6	not published	2.7	10.2	not published	535–887	60.3%	314–906	34.7%	489–627	78.0%	56.1%	60.4%	35.0%
Sum of players				78.2	29.0	16.6	4.7	2.7	9.5	18.3	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.4	+0.0	not published	0.0	+0.7	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.60M; 80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.60M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Tucker DeVries	84.8%	$1.00M	$625K to $1.85M	27.5%	$1.00M in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Lamar Wilkerson	84.3%	$585K	$375K to $875K	16.7%	$585K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Conor Enright	74.9%	$410K	$160K to $640K	12.2%	$410K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Nick Dorn	56.2%	$165K	$26K to $355K	4.9%	$165K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Sam Alexis	51.2%	$310K	$155K to $475K	9.2%	$310K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Reed Bailey	49.0%	$305K	$160K to $480K	8.9%	$305K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Tayton Conerway	46.9%	$380K	$220K to $615K	10.5%	$380K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Trent Sisley	28.5%	$135K	$38K to $230K	4.0%	$135K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Jasai Miles	18.3%	$46K	$19K to $110K	1.2%	$46K in all four	$26K	Sufficient evidence
Aleksa Ristic	2.2%	$26K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$26K in all four	$26K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Ian Stephens	1.4%	$26K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$26K in all four	$26K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Drew Snively	1.1%	$26K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$26K in all four	$26K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Tryce Grensing	1.1%	$26K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$26K in all four	$26K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.60M	$2.60M to $4.95M	100%	$3.60M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Indiana University-Bloomington (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$52,276,379
Men's basketball expenses	$31,818,423
Athletics department expenses	$159,331,697
Athletics department revenue	$182,095,778

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 32 games, 2,156 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	78.2	72.2
Field goals made	26.5	24.6
Field goals attempted	56.0	57.3
3-pointers made	9.8	7.0
3-pointers attempted	28.3	21.1
Free throws made	15.3	16.1
Free throws attempted	19.6	21.2
Offensive rebounds	8.2	10.0
Defensive rebounds	24.2	22.4
Total rebounds	32.4	32.4
Assists	16.6	12.0
Blocks	2.7	2.8
Turnovers	10.2	10.2
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 149.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 585.
Minutes (derived)	202.3	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,501	2,501	0	±12.5	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	849	849	0	±4.2	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,793	1,793	0	±9.0	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	314	314	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	906	906	0	±4.5	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	489	489	0	±2.4	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	627	627	0	±3.1	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,037	927	+110	±83.0	0
Assists	Reconciled	532	531	+1	±2.7	0
Blocks	Reconciled	86	86	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	325	304	+21	±9.8	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	149	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	585	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,475	6,451	+23.8	±129.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Tucker DeVries	84.8%	+5.6range +3.8 to +7.0Sufficient evidence
Lamar Wilkerson	84.3%	+2.9range +2.0 to +3.8Sufficient evidence
Conor Enright	74.9%	+2.1range +0.6 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Nick Dorn	56.2%	-0.2range -1.8 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Sam Alexis	51.2%	+2.2range +0.9 to +3.4Sufficient evidence
Reed Bailey	49.0%	+2.4range +1.1 to +3.4Sufficient evidence
Tayton Conerway	46.9%	+3.4range +1.7 to +4.9Sufficient evidence
Trent Sisley	28.5%	+0.9range -0.4 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Jasai Miles	18.3%	-2.0range -3.0 to -0.8Sufficient evidence
Aleksa Ristic	2.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Ian Stephens	1.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Drew Snively	1.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Tryce Grensing	1.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +11.9range +10.7 to +12.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 98.8% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value