West Virginia

B12 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 72 · Raw net 7.5 · Tempo 64.1 · 35 Division I games · Through 2026-04-05

Record: 21–14; 21 wins
AdjNet: 11.3β; rank 55 of 365
AdjO: 110.2β; rank 126 of 365
AdjD: 99.0β; rank 22 of 365
AdjT: 64.2β
SOS: 5.4β; rank 77 of 363
NCSOS: -7.6β
WAB: -1.3β; rank 63 of 363
RR: 0.1β
Exp. W: 20.9β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	108.2178	100.731	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	51.6166	48.552	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	16.8186	17.8108	16.7
Offensive rebound %	30.5178	28.686	30.6
FTA / FGA %	35.1173	29.348	35.0
Shooting
3P%	33.1227	34.3201	33.9
2P%	53.1125	46.825	51.7
FT%	68.3319	72.8199	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	43.0	38.3	39.5
Assists / FGM %	51.9	54.3	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.1	11.5	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	33.5	33.2	31.4
2-pointers %	47.7	48.8	48.8
Free throws %	18.9	18.0	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.2
Top Three Share of Minutes: 46%
Bench Share of Minutes: 30%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-04	Mount St. Mary's	W 70–54	67.3	Home	1–0
11-06	Campbell	W 73–65	68.0	Home	2–0
11-09	Lehigh	W 69–47	64.5	Home	3–0
11-13	Pittsburgh	W 71–49	62.9	Home	4–0
11-17	Lafayette	W 81–59	66.8	Home	5–0
11-21	Clemson	L 67–70	66.0	Neutral	5–1
11-23	Xavier	L 68–78	67.9	Neutral	5–2
11-30	Mercyhurst	W 70–38	60.6	Home	6–2
12-03	Coppin St.	W 91–49	69.9	Home	7–2
12-06	Wake Forest	L 66–75	60.8	Neutral	7–3
12-09	Little Rock	W 90–58	62.8	Home	8–3
12-13	Ohio St.	L 88–89 2OT	82.5	Neutral	8–4
12-22	Mississippi Val.	W 86–51	58.6	Home	9–4
01-02	Iowa St.	L 59–80	60.4	Away	9–5
01-06	Cincinnati	W 62–60	63.7	Home	10–5
01-10	Kansas	W 86–75	66.7	Home	11–5
01-13	Houston	L 48–77	61.4	Away	11–6
01-17	Colorado	W 72–61	59.0	Home	12–6
01-21	Arizona St.	W 75–63	65.4	Away	13–6
01-24	Arizona	L 53–88	67.9	Away	13–7
01-27	Kansas St.	W 59–54	61.6	Home	14–7
01-31	Baylor	L 53–63	60.5	Home	14–8
02-05	Cincinnati	W 59–54	60.1	Away	15–8
02-08	Texas Tech	L 63–70	64.5	Home	15–9
02-14	UCF	W 74–67	67.8	Away	16–9
02-18	Utah	L 56–61	61.0	Home	16–10
02-21	TCU	L 54–60	60.3	Away	16–11
02-24	Oklahoma St.	L 84–91 1OT	72.8	Away	16–12
02-28	BYU	W 79–71	63.2	Home	17–12
03-03	Kansas St.	L 63–65	66.7	Away	17–13
03-06	UCF	W 77–62	66.7	Home	18–13
03-11	BYU	L 48–68	62.6	Neutral	18–14
04-02	Stanford	W 82–77 1OT	73.4	—	19–14
04-04	Creighton	W 87–70	67.6	—	20–14
04-05	Oklahoma	W 89–82 1OT	71.8	—	21–14

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 35 of 35 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Honor Huff	35	35:54	88.2%	18.4	2.5	2.3	1.1	0.0	1.9	2.3	33–87	37.9%	120–339	35.4%	152–175	86.9%	50.0%	57.5%	41.1%	5	39:09 +3:15	93.2%	22.6 +6.1
Treysen Eaglestaff	35	28:45	70.6%	13.6	6.4	2.0	1.2	0.5	1.9	2.7	64–137	46.7%	60–175	34.3%	35–47	74.5%	49.4%	51.6%	15.1%	5	27:04 −1:41	64.4%	10.2 +0.4
Brenen Lorient	34	29:20	70.0%	16.2	7.1	2.6	0.9	1.8	2.6	3.3	141–238	59.2%	24–67	35.8%	50–71	70.4%	58.0%	60.1%	23.3%	5	35:27 +6:07	84.4%	13.8 +1.9
Jasper Floyd	35	28:20	69.6%	9.9	5.3	4.5	2.5	0.0	2.6	3.5	67–131	51.1%	23–61	37.7%	42–60	70.0%	52.9%	56.1%	31.3%	5	31:14 +2:54	74.4%	7.0 0.0
Harlan Obioha	35	20:16	49.8%	10.0	9.1	1.6	0.7	1.2	1.7	4.3	62–116	53.4%	1–4	25.0%†	51–90	56.7%	52.9%	55.8%	75.0%	5	20:50 +0:34	49.6%	4.4 −0.7
Chance Moore	29	21:46	44.3%	19.4	10.7	1.4	1.3	1.2	2.3	2.2	104–181	57.5%	9–32	28.1%†	71–126	56.3%	55.2%	57.0%	59.2%	5	24:34 +2:48	58.5%	11.4 +0.8
DJ Thomas	35	16:23	40.3%	16.0	5.1	1.5	0.7	0.3	1.8	3.0	71–108	65.7%	21–78	26.9%	25–40	62.5%	55.1%	56.5%	21.5%	5	18:29 +2:06	44.0%	6.6 0.0
Amir Jenkins	32	16:01	36.0%	8.6	5.3	5.1	1.6	0.0	1.8	3.7	29–82	35.4%	8–28	28.6%†	28–52	53.8%	37.3%	41.4%	47.3%	2	14:28 −1:33	13.8%	0.5 −2.9
Morris Ugusuk	25	10:42	18.8%	4.9	5.2	0.6	0.6	0.1	0.3	2.1	5–9	55.6%†	6–35	17.1%†	5–9	55.6%†	31.8%†	34.4%†	20.5%†	4	7:54 −2:49	15.0%	0.5 −0.8
Jackson FieldsFew games	9	14:04	8.9%	12.3	9.8	3.2	0.6	0.9	0.9	4.4	13–20	65.0%†	2–8	25.0%†	7–10	70.0%†	57.1%†	60.2%†	35.7%†	—	—	—	—
Jayden ForsytheFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	3:49	1.3%	12.6	4.2	0.0	2.1	0.0	0.0	4.2	0–0	—	2–7	28.6%†	0–0	—	42.9%†	42.9%†	0.0%†	—	—	—	—
Niyol HauetFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	1:38	0.7%	0.0	4.1	0.0	0.0	0.0	4.1	4.1	0–0	—	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	1:13 −0:25	0.6%	0.0 0.0
Abraham OyeadierFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	1:40	0.1%	0.0	48.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–2	0.0%†	—	0.0%†	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	35 games			69.4	34.1	12.6	not published	3.1	10.8	not published	589–1109	53.1%	276–835	33.1%	466–682	68.3%	51.6%	55.1%	35.1%
Sum of players				69.4	30.7	12.6	6.2	3.0	10.2	15.2	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.3	0.0	not published	+0.0	+0.6	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.55M; 80% Range $2.60M to $4.95M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.55M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Honor Huff	88.6%	$505K	$210K to $795K	15.0%	$505K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Treysen Eaglestaff	71.2%	$635K	$405K to $1.05M	17.3%	$635K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Brenen Lorient	70.8%	$300K	$62K to $520K	9.1%	$300K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jasper Floyd	69.8%	$875K	$535K to $1.65M	24.2%	$875K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Harlan Obioha	51.0%	$485K	$310K to $795K	13.3%	$485K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidence
Chance Moore	43.9%	$175K	$40K to $310K	5.2%	$175K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
DJ Thomas	39.8%	$130K	$26K to $265K	3.9%	$130K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Amir Jenkins	35.5%	$89K	$21K to $205K	2.6%	$89K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Morris Ugusuk	18.9%	$61K	$21K to $130K	1.8%	$61K in all four	$27K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jackson Fields	8.5%	$79K	$51K to $115K	2.3%	$79K in all four	$27K	Limited evidence
Jayden Forsythe	1.3%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Niyol Hauet	0.6%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Abraham Oyeadier	0.1%	$27K	$15K to $43K	0.8%	$27K in all four	$27K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.55M	$2.60M to $4.95M	100%	$3.55M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, West Virginia University (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$10,222,908	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$10,222,908
Athletics department expenses	$117,413,366
Athletics department revenue	$117,413,366

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 35 games, 2,284 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1425 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	69.4	64.6
Field goals made	24.3	22.9
Field goals attempted	54.6	54.6
3-pointers made	7.7	7.2
3-pointers attempted	23.4	20.9
Free throws made	13.1	11.6
Free throws attempted	19.1	16.0
Offensive rebounds	10.2	9.6
Defensive rebounds	23.9	23.2
Total rebounds	34.1	32.8
Assists	12.6	12.4
Blocks	3.1	3.6
Turnovers	10.8	11.4
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 222.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 541.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

35 of 35 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,472	2,472	0	±12.4	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	865	865	0	±4.3	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,944	1,944	0	±9.7	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	276	276	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	835	835	0	±4.2	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	466	466	0	±2.3	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	682	682	0	±3.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,214	1,095	+119	±97.1	0
Assists	Reconciled	449	449	0	±2.2	0
Blocks	Reconciled	109	108	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	384	364	+20	±11.5	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	222	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	541	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	7,125	7,104	+21.2	±142.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Honor Huff	88.6%	+1.9range +0.7 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Treysen Eaglestaff	71.2%	+3.8range +2.4 to +5.2Sufficient evidence
Brenen Lorient	70.8%	+0.7range -0.3 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Jasper Floyd	69.8%	+5.4range +4.2 to +6.9Sufficient evidence
Harlan Obioha	51.0%	+4.0range +2.7 to +5.7Sufficient evidence
Chance Moore	43.9%	+0.4range -0.5 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
DJ Thomas	39.8%	-0.3range -1.6 to +1.1Sufficient evidence
Amir Jenkins	35.5%	-1.1range -2.1 to +0.0Sufficient evidence
Morris Ugusuk	18.9%	-0.9range -2.4 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Jackson Fields	8.5%	+2.5range +2.1 to +2.9Limited evidence
Jayden Forsythe	1.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Niyol Hauet	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Abraham Oyeadier	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +11.5range +10.6 to +12.5Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 99.6% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.4%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.7%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value