DJ Thomas
West Virginia · 2025–26 · 35 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
573:36 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 35
- Minutes per game
- 16:23
- Points per game
- 6.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.1 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.6 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.0 | 5.1 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 230 | 73 | 21 | 10 | 5 | 26 | 43 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 92–186 | 49.5% | 5.3 | 13.0 |
| 2P | 71–108 | 65.7% | 3.1 | 7.5 |
| 3P | 21–78 | 26.9% | 2.2 | 5.4 |
| FT | 25–40 | 62.5% | 1.1 | 2.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.1% | 56.5% | 41.9% | 21.5% | 0.81 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
West Virginia · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $130K
- 80% range $26K to $265K
- Median share of team pool
- 3.9%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $130K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 39.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
West Virginia: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | West Virginia | $130Kspeculative | $26K to $265K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.3 | -1.6 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | -0.3 | +2.5range +2.1 to +3.0 | 1,816 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 18:29 | 16:23 | 1:51–27:45 | |
| Points | 6.6 | 6.6 | 0.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 35.7% | 53.2% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-05 | Oklahoma | W 89–82 | 18:10 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-04-04 | Creighton | W 87–70 | 20:40 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9-14 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 71.4% |
| 2026-04-02 | Stanford | W 82–77 | 18:08 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2026-03-11 | BYU | L 48–68 | 18:46 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-06 | UCF | W 77–62 | 16:41 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Kansas St. | L 63–65 | 17:58 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-11 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | BYU | W 79–71 | 16:45 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-7 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 85.7% |
| 2026-02-24 | Oklahoma St. | L 84–91 | 15:30 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | TCU | L 54–60 | 16:39 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Utah | L 56–61 | 10:32 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | UCF | W 74–67 | 14:44 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | Texas Tech | L 63–70 | 7:58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | Cincinnati | W 59–54 | 22:11 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-6 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Baylor | L 53–63 | 15:32 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-27 | Kansas St. | W 59–54 | 20:09 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Arizona | L 53–88 | 16:40 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Arizona St. | W 75–63 | 18:58 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Colorado | W 72–61 | 12:12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-13 | Houston | L 48–77 | 21:44 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6-8 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Kansas | W 86–75 | 13:04 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-06 | Cincinnati | W 62–60 | 15:36 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | Iowa St. | L 59–80 | 18:20 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-22 | Mississippi Val. | W 86–51 | 19:48 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 4-5 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | Ohio St. | L 88–89 | 1:51 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-09 | Little Rock | W 90–58 | 17:21 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Wake Forest | L 66–75 | 7:48 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Coppin St. | W 91–49 | 9:10 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | Mercyhurst | W 70–38 | 12:24 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | Xavier | L 68–78 | 18:40 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-21 | Clemson | L 67–70 | 8:45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Lafayette | W 81–59 | 27:45 | 25 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11-17 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 64.7% |
| 2025-11-13 | Pittsburgh | W 71–49 | 22:05 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-09 | Lehigh | W 69–47 | 19:59 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-06 | Campbell | W 73–65 | 22:17 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-04 | Mount St. Mary's | W 70–54 | 18:46 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 50.0% |