Louisiana

SB · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 318 · Raw net -10.9 · Tempo 64.1 · 33 Division I games · Through 2026-03-04

Record: 11–22; 11 wins
AdjNet: -12.1β; rank 321 of 365
AdjO: 99.7β; rank 336 of 365
AdjD: 111.8β; rank 265 of 365
AdjT: 64.8β
SOS: -3.2β; rank 272 of 363
NCSOS: -1.6β
WAB: -15.8β; rank 322 of 363
RR: 0.7β
Exp. W: 10.3β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	99.3333	110.2225	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	47.1334	52.6247	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	16.8184	18.385	16.7
Offensive rebound %	28.3250	32.3273	30.6
FTA / FGA %	28.7334	45.8352	35.0
Shooting
3P%	33.6189	35.6286	33.9
2P%	44.8356	52.2208	51.7
FT%	70.4261	72.8200	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	40.5	36.2	39.5
Assists / FGM %	45.9	49.7	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	10.8	8.0	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	35.7	27.9	31.4
2-pointers %	46.6	48.0	48.8
Free throws %	17.7	24.1	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.4
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 36%
Players with Logged Minutes: 15

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Ball St.	L 64–75	64.3	Away	0–1
11-07	Southeastern La.	W 58–52	58.2	Home	1–1
11-11	Tulane	L 62–66	63.9	Home	1–2
11-14	McNeese	L 62–88	66.7	Away	1–3
11-18	Stanford	L 66–93	71.3	Away	1–4
11-21	Santa Clara	L 43–80	66.5	Away	1–5
11-24	UC Davis	L 56–77	65.2	Away	1–6
11-28	Jackson St.	L 45–51	62.0	Home	1–7
12-03	Lamar University	L 55–65	61.1	Away	1–8
12-06	UNCW	L 63–70	63.8	Home	1–9
12-13	Louisiana Tech	L 44–65	60.1	Away	1–10
12-18	Southern Miss.	L 54–62	67.8	Away	1–11
12-20	ULM	W 76–62	63.6	Away	2–11
12-28	Norfolk St.	W 63–54	58.9	Home	3–11
12-31	South Alabama	L 58–63	55.9	Home	3–12
01-03	Southern Miss.	L 67–74	67.9	Home	3–13
01-08	ULM	W 85–79	71.3	Home	4–13
01-10	Troy	L 70–90	63.7	Home	4–14
01-14	Texas St.	L 54–59	60.9	Away	4–15
01-17	South Alabama	W 59–56	57.3	Away	5–15
01-22	App State	L 58–72	59.2	Away	5–16
01-29	Georgia St.	W 82–72	64.8	Home	6–16
01-31	Ga. Southern	W 69–60	61.9	Home	7–16
02-04	James Madison	W 64–61	56.6	Away	8–16
02-07	Central Mich.	W 85–80	64.0	Home	9–16
02-12	Coastal Carolina	L 65–69	69.9	Home	9–17
02-16	Old Dominion	L 72–83	66.6	Away	9–18
02-19	Arkansas St.	L 62–79	68.8	Home	9–19
02-21	Texas St.	W 67–54	59.8	Home	10–19
02-24	Troy	L 59–78	57.1	Away	10–20
02-27	Arkansas St.	L 58–81	75.7	Away	10–21
03-03	Georgia St.	W 84–75	69.3	Neutral	11–21
03-04	James Madison	L 72–87	71.2	Neutral	11–22

Roster · 15 players

Player logs in 33 of 33 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Dorian Finister	31	32:26	76.2%	461	143	60	34	15	57	65	111–229	48.5%	40–108	37.0%	119–160	74.4%	50.7%	56.6%	47.5%	3	33:48 +1:22	50.7%	18.3 +3.5
De'Vion Lavergne	33	30:04	75.2%	326	109	93	31	12	51	64	81–198	40.9%	40–131	30.5%	44–62	71.0%	42.9%	45.8%	18.8%	5	30:40 +0:36	76.7%	8.2 −1.7
Jaxon Olvera	33	28:49	72.1%	452	148	62	18	2	80	69	111–267	41.6%	57–160	35.6%	59–82	72.0%	46.0%	48.8%	19.2%	5	30:47 +1:58	77.0%	21.8 +8.1
Milan Mejia	29	21:56	48.2%	104	37	20	28	1	14	54	5–17	29.4%	31–97	32.0%	1–3	33.3%†	45.2%	45.1%	2.6%	5	22:59 +1:03	57.5%	2.4 −1.2
Dariyus Woodson	33	18:46	46.9%	191	83	19	5	8	24	38	23–42	54.8%	39–101	38.6%	28–45	62.2%	57.0%	58.7%	31.5%	5	21:19 +2:32	53.3%	5.6 −0.2
Todd Jones Jr.	33	16:30	41.3%	101	128	9	17	37	21	87	41–69	59.4%†	0–1	0.0%†	19–34	55.9%	58.6%†	59.4%†	48.6%†	5	17:51 +1:21	44.6%	4.2 +1.1
Karris Bilal	21	20:57	33.3%	117	41	8	19	2	8	39	24–67	35.8%	13–49	26.5%†	30–38	78.9%	37.5%	44.1%	32.8%	5	23:38 +2:41	59.1%	7.8 +2.2
Joshua Lewis	18	22:33	30.7%	145	68	13	8	6	16	61	34–60	56.7%	20–45	44.4%†	17–22	77.3%†	61.0%	63.2%	21.0%	—	—	—	—
Jeremiah Evans	32	11:07	27.0%	95	63	9	11	19	30	89	33–67	49.3%†	0–0	—	29–41	70.7%	49.3%†	55.9%†	61.2%†	5	10:49 −0:18	27.0%	3.4 +0.4
Michael Collins	31	9:23	22.0%	42	23	31	12	2	10	21	12–35	34.3%†	2–25	8.0%†	12–19	63.2%†	25.0%†	30.7%†	31.7%†	5	14:00 +4:37	35.0%	2.4 +1.0
Kyran Ratliff	31	8:31	20.0%	31	54	8	5	10	8	32	7–20	35.0%†	4–13	30.8%†	5–9	55.6%†	39.4%†	41.9%†	27.3%†	5	5:40 −2:51	14.2%	0.8 −0.2
Jamyron KellerFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	29:17	4.4%	34	4	6	3	1	3	5	7–17	41.2%†	4–13	30.8%†	8–12	66.7%†	43.3%†	48.2%†	40.0%†	—	—	—	—
Michael MoutonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	2:17	1.0%	2	1	2	0	1	0	3	1–4	25.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	25.0%†	25.0%†	0.0%†	2	1:35 −0:42	1.6%	1.0 +0.7
Logan MyersFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	0:56	0.2%	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:20 −0:36	0.2%	0.0 0.0
Christian LandryFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	1:23	0.2%	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	2	1:23 0:00	1.4%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · season totals	33 games			2101	1001	340	not published	116	355	not published	490–1093	44.8%	250–743	33.6%	371–527	70.4%	47.1%	50.8%	28.7%
Sum of players				2101	902	340	191	116	322	627	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+99	0	not published	0	+33	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $305K; 80% Range $110K to $795K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $280K to $315K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 15; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Dorian Finister	75.5%	$30K	$2K to $115K	13.6%	$28K to $32K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
De'Vion Lavergne	75.5%	$44K	$4K to $150K	15.8%	$41K to $46K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaxon Olvera	72.5%	$7K	$1K to $54K	1.7%	$6K to $7K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dariyus Woodson	47.3%	$13K	$1K to $63K	6.6%	$12K to $14K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Milan Mejia	46.9%	$23K	$2K to $91K	9.2%	$21K to $23K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Todd Jones Jr.	41.0%	$41K	$9K to $155K	11.3%	$38K to $42K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Karris Bilal	34.9%	$11K	$1K to $50K	5.6%	$10K to $11K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Joshua Lewis	30.3%	$9K	$1K to $38K	4.7%	$8K to $10K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jeremiah Evans	27.0%	$16K	$2K to $66K	5.9%	$15K to $16K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Michael Collins	22.4%	$14K	$2K to $55K	5.1%	$13K to $15K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kyran Ratliff	20.4%	$8K	$1K to $33K	3.7%	$7K to $8K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jamyron Keller	4.7%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Michael Mouton	1.1%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Logan Myers	0.3%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Christian Landry	0.2%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$305K	$110K to $795K	100%	$280K to $315K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Louisiana at Lafayette (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$3,342,908	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$3,342,908
Athletics department expenses	$42,959,075
Athletics department revenue	$42,959,075

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 33 games, 2,115 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,101	2,332
Field goals made	740	777
Field goals attempted	1,836	1,683
3-pointers made	250	217
3-pointers attempted	743	610
Free throws made	371	561
Free throws attempted	527	771
Offensive rebounds	324	323
Defensive rebounds	677	819
Total rebounds	1,001	1,142
Assists	340	386
Blocks	116	87
Turnovers	355	387
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 191.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 627.
Minutes (derived)	6,600	not published

33 of 33 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,101	2,101	0	±10.5	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	740	740	0	±3.7	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,836	1,836	0	±9.2	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	250	250	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	743	743	0	±3.7	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	371	371	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	527	527	0	±2.6	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,001	902	+99	±80.1	0
Assists	Reconciled	340	340	0	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	116	116	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	355	322	+33	±10.7	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	191	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	627	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,600	6,583	+16.9	±132.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Dorian Finister	75.5%	-1.1range -2.0 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
De'Vion Lavergne	75.5%	-0.4range -1.5 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Jaxon Olvera	72.5%	-3.0range -4.2 to -1.8Sufficient evidence
Dariyus Woodson	47.3%	-1.9range -3.4 to -0.1Sufficient evidence
Milan Mejia	46.9%	-0.8range -2.1 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Todd Jones Jr.	41.0%	+0.2range -0.8 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Karris Bilal	34.9%	-1.5range -2.7 to -0.1Sufficient evidence
Joshua Lewis	30.3%	-1.4range -2.4 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Jeremiah Evans	27.0%	-0.5range -1.7 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Michael Collins	22.4%	-0.4range -1.7 to +0.7Sufficient evidence
Kyran Ratliff	20.4%	-1.2range -2.3 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Jamyron Keller	4.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Michael Mouton	1.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Logan Myers	0.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Christian Landry	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +8.2range +7.4 to +9.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 98.7% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value