Dorian Finister
Louisiana · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1005:22 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 32:26
- Points per game
- 14.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.6 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.9 | 4.6 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.3 | 5.7 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 461 | 143 | 60 | 34 | 15 | 57 | 65 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 151–337 | 44.8% | 10.9 | 13.4 |
| 2P | 111–229 | 48.5% | 7.4 | 9.1 |
| 3P | 40–108 | 37.0% | 3.5 | 4.3 |
| FT | 119–160 | 74.4% | 5.2 | 6.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.7% | 56.6% | 32.0% | 47.5% | 1.05 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Louisiana · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $30K
- 80% range $2K to $115K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.6%
- team pool $305K, 80% range $110K to $795K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $28K to $32K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 75.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Louisiana: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Louisiana | $30Kspeculative | $2K to $115K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.1 | -2.0 to +0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | -0.7 | +3.7range +3.2 to +4.2 | 2,900 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Sam Houston St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.9 | -3.1 to -0.8 | Sufficient evidence | -1.0 | -1.0 | +1.5range +1.1 to +1.9 | 1,584 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Kansas St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.6 | -2.7 to -0.9 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | -0.8 | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.7 | 744 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:13 | 32:26 | 25:13–37:20 | |
| Points | 18.0 | 14.9 | 4.0–27.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 53.9% | 50.3% | 25.0%–79.2% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-04 | James Madison | L 72–87 | 33:19 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9-13 | 2-3 | 7-9 | 76.9% |
| 2026-03-03 | Georgia St. | W 84–75 | 32:35 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5-11 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 45.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Texas St. | W 67–54 | 35:30 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5-10 | 1-1 | 4-6 | 55.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | Arkansas St. | L 62–79 | 32:37 | 18 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-15 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-16 | Old Dominion | L 72–83 | 27:04 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-13 | 1-5 | 6-9 | 42.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | Coastal Carolina | L 65–69 | 36:15 | 19 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-11 | 0-1 | 9-11 | 45.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | Central Mich. | W 85–80 | 32:55 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-10 | 1-3 | 3-5 | 35.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | James Madison | W 64–61 | 35:25 | 18 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-17 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Ga. Southern | W 69–60 | 26:03 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-8 | 2-4 | 3-6 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | Georgia St. | W 82–72 | 28:24 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6-14 | 0-3 | 6-7 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-22 | App State | L 58–72 | 34:05 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4-10 | 2-4 | 6-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | South Alabama | W 59–56 | 37:20 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 45.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Texas St. | L 54–59 | 33:41 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-12 | 2-3 | 6-9 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Troy | L 70–90 | 34:21 | 25 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8-12 | 3-5 | 6-7 | 79.2% |
| 2026-01-08 | ULM | W 85–79 | 31:09 | 16 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6-13 | 3-5 | 1-4 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | Southern Miss. | L 67–74 | 31:59 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5-12 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | South Alabama | L 58–63 | 33:16 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-10 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 65.0% |
| 2025-12-28 | Norfolk St. | W 63–54 | 34:17 | 15 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 8-8 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-20 | ULM | W 76–62 | 36:56 | 15 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 5-6 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-18 | Southern Miss. | L 54–62 | 33:27 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6-12 | 1-2 | 7-9 | 54.2% |
| 2025-12-13 | Louisiana Tech | L 44–65 | 26:54 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-12 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | UNCW | L 63–70 | 34:41 | 16 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-11 | 0-2 | 6-8 | 45.5% |
| 2025-12-03 | Lamar University | L 55–65 | 25:13 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3-9 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-28 | Jackson St. | L 45–51 | 32:16 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | UC Davis | L 56–77 | 33:57 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-11 | 0-4 | 3-3 | 27.3% |
| 2025-11-21 | Santa Clara | L 43–80 | 35:58 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 6-13 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 46.2% |
| 2025-11-18 | Stanford | L 66–93 | 30:25 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-14 | McNeese | L 62–88 | 36:29 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7-14 | 2-3 | 9-10 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-11 | Tulane | L 62–66 | 27:40 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 35.7% |
| 2025-11-07 | Southeastern La. | W 58–52 | 28:56 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Ball St. | L 64–75 | 32:15 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 40.0% |