Jaxon Olvera
Louisiana · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
951:06 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 28:49
- Points per game
- 13.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.5 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.7 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.0 | 6.2 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 3.4 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 452 | 148 | 62 | 18 | 2 | 80 | 69 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 168–427 | 39.3% | 12.9 | 18.0 |
| 2P | 111–267 | 41.6% | 8.1 | 11.2 |
| 3P | 57–160 | 35.6% | 4.8 | 6.7 |
| FT | 59–82 | 72.0% | 2.5 | 3.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.0% | 48.8% | 37.5% | 19.2% | 0.78 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Louisiana · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $7K
- 80% range $1K to $54K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.7%
- team pool $305K, 80% range $110K to $795K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $6K to $7K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 72.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Louisiana: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Louisiana | $7Kspeculative | $1K to $54K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -3.0 | -4.2 to -1.8 | Sufficient evidence | -0.7 | -2.3 | +2.8range +2.2 to +3.3 | 2,787 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 30:47 | 28:49 | 9:15–37:16 | |
| Points | 21.8 | 13.7 | 0.0–29.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 55.5% | 44.5% | 0.0%–75.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-04 | James Madison | L 72–87 | 36:43 | 28 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10-21 | 2-4 | 6-6 | 52.4% |
| 2026-03-03 | Georgia St. | W 84–75 | 31:19 | 29 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 9-16 | 2-2 | 9-11 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-27 | Arkansas St. | L 58–81 | 32:54 | 13 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-17 | 1-5 | 2-4 | 32.4% |
| 2026-02-24 | Troy | L 59–78 | 26:51 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 8-13 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 73.1% |
| 2026-02-21 | Texas St. | W 67–54 | 26:08 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7-14 | 2-3 | 4-6 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-19 | Arkansas St. | L 62–79 | 31:04 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-19 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 42.1% |
| 2026-02-16 | Old Dominion | L 72–83 | 33:46 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10-20 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 52.5% |
| 2026-02-12 | Coastal Carolina | L 65–69 | 25:26 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7-11 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 68.2% |
| 2026-02-07 | Central Mich. | W 85–80 | 29:12 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | James Madison | W 64–61 | 30:28 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-11 | 1-6 | 2-2 | 22.7% |
| 2026-01-31 | Ga. Southern | W 69–60 | 30:44 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 7-13 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | Georgia St. | W 82–72 | 32:13 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-8 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | App State | L 58–72 | 26:55 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-14 | 1-9 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | South Alabama | W 59–56 | 26:51 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-13 | 4-11 | 0-0 | 53.8% |
| 2026-01-14 | Texas St. | L 54–59 | 35:38 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-9 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 27.8% |
| 2026-01-10 | Troy | L 70–90 | 9:15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | ULM | W 85–79 | 26:36 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-8 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | Southern Miss. | L 67–74 | 27:22 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-15 | 1-8 | 2-2 | 23.3% |
| 2025-12-31 | South Alabama | L 58–63 | 28:55 | 18 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-18 | 5-15 | 1-2 | 47.2% |
| 2025-12-28 | Norfolk St. | W 63–54 | 25:07 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 3-6 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | ULM | W 76–62 | 31:14 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-15 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 53.3% |
| 2025-12-18 | Southern Miss. | L 54–62 | 26:51 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 5-14 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 39.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | Louisiana Tech | L 44–65 | 28:40 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-11 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 40.9% |
| 2025-12-06 | UNCW | L 63–70 | 37:16 | 21 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7-18 | 4-7 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Lamar University | L 55–65 | 35:56 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4-12 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 45.8% |
| 2025-11-28 | Jackson St. | L 45–51 | 32:18 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3-11 | 1-7 | 3-4 | 31.8% |
| 2025-11-24 | UC Davis | L 56–77 | 25:14 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3-10 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Santa Clara | L 43–80 | 18:53 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Stanford | L 66–93 | 26:23 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5-11 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | McNeese | L 62–88 | 29:51 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4-14 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 35.7% |
| 2025-11-11 | Tulane | L 62–66 | 25:53 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7-17 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Southeastern La. | W 58–52 | 31:44 | 20 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9-16 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-03 | Ball St. | L 64–75 | 27:26 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5-11 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 54.5% |