Wright St.

Horz · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 85 · Raw net 6.0 · Tempo 68.9 · 33 Division I games · Through 2026-03-20

Record: 21–12; 21 wins
AdjNet: 3.2β; rank 124 of 365
AdjO: 111.7β; rank 100 of 365
AdjD: 108.5β; rank 185 of 365
AdjT: 68.0β
SOS: -2.3β; rank 240 of 363
NCSOS: 1.4β
WAB: -5.8β; rank 125 of 363
RR: -0.1β
Exp. W: 21.1β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	115.455	109.3207	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	54.356	52.4237	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	16.1147	16.7175	16.7
Offensive rebound %	32.892	29.4129	30.6
FTA / FGA %	37.4119	33.3137	35.0
Shooting
3P%	36.444	34.3202	33.9
2P%	54.281	52.9237	51.7
FT%	74.792	74.4294	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	34.2	34.5	39.5
Assists / FGM %	46.9	44.6	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	11.4	9.1	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	27.4	27.4	31.4
2-pointers %	52.2	53.5	48.8
Free throws %	20.4	19.1	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.1
Top Three Share of Minutes: 40%
Bench Share of Minutes: 37%
Players with Logged Minutes: 12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-06	California	L 67–77	69.6	Away	0–1
11-11	Toledo	L 71–81	66.6	Home	0–2
11-15	Radford	W 92–59	72.4	Neutral	1–2
11-16	Kent St.	L 72–76 1OT	73.7	Neutral	1–3
11-25	Stetson	W 79–62	64.6	Away	2–3
11-28	Butler	L 69–94	75.4	Away	2–4
12-03	Youngstown St.	L 68–69	68.9	Away	2–5
12-07	Green Bay	W 86–58	67.7	Home	3–5
12-13	Marshall	L 74–76	63.2	Away	3–6
12-16	Miami (OH)	L 76–83	72.3	Home	3–7
12-22	Eastern Mich.	W 70–64	67.9	Home	4–7
12-29	Oakland	W 88–73	70.8	Home	5–7
01-01	Milwaukee	W 76–70	65.0	Home	6–7
01-04	IU Indy	W 81–77	67.0	Away	7–7
01-09	Detroit Mercy	W 84–82	70.5	Away	8–7
01-11	Oakland	W 94–84	73.2	Away	9–7
01-15	Youngstown St.	W 93–83	65.5	Home	10–7
01-21	Cleveland St.	L 79–85	69.0	Home	10–8
01-24	Northern Ky.	W 88–80	70.3	Home	11–8
01-30	Milwaukee	W 76–69	72.8	Away	12–8
02-01	Green Bay	W 83–75	63.3	Away	13–8
02-04	Robert Morris	L 66–72	68.6	Away	13–9
02-07	Purdue Fort Wayne	W 73–68	62.3	Home	14–9
02-12	Detroit Mercy	L 74–77	66.2	Home	14–10
02-15	Cleveland St.	W 102–90	74.2	Away	15–10
02-19	IU Indy	W 85–73	71.2	Home	16–10
02-22	Robert Morris	L 68–81	67.6	Home	16–11
02-25	Purdue Fort Wayne	W 74–70	70.9	Away	17–11
02-28	Northern Ky.	W 92–91	70.0	Away	18–11
03-04	Cleveland St.	W 90–61	69.2	Home	19–11
03-09	Northern Ky.	W 103–90	78.5	Neutral	20–11
03-10	Detroit Mercy	W 66–63	68.2	Neutral	21–11
03-20	Virginia	L 73–82	64.9	—	21–12

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 33 of 33 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Solomon Callaghan	32	28:21	68.5%	10.4	2.0	1.1	0.5	0.0	0.8	1.5	30–64	46.9%	70–172	40.7%	63–68	92.6%	57.2%	62.6%	28.8%	5	24:41 −3:40	61.7%	9.6 −0.8
Dominic Pangonis	33	27:02	67.3%	8.9	2.5	1.2	0.8	0.2	1.0	2.1	57–105	54.3%	37–93	39.8%	69–94	73.4%	56.8%	61.4%	47.5%	5	22:36 −4:26	56.5%	5.8 −3.1
TJ Burch	33	24:57	62.1%	12.8	2.5	3.4	2.5	0.3	2.1	2.4	135–276	48.9%	26–74	35.1%	74–101	73.3%	49.7%	53.5%	28.9%	5	28:13 +3:16	70.5%	17.2 +4.4
Michael Imariagbe	32	24:36	59.4%	11.9	7.1	1.8	0.6	0.8	1.9	3.2	130–221	58.8%	6–15	40.0%†	104–152	68.4%	58.9%	63.1%	64.4%	5	27:14 +2:38	68.1%	14.0 +2.1
Michael Cooper	29	26:20	57.6%	13.8	2.7	2.0	0.6	0.2	1.2	1.7	99–194	51.0%	46–129	35.7%	64–78	82.1%	52.0%	56.0%	24.1%	5	27:37 +1:17	69.0%	15.0 +1.2
Kellen Pickett	33	23:00	57.3%	8.5	5.5	1.0	0.5	1.4	1.0	1.9	90–140	64.3%	13–51	25.5%	61–80	76.3%	57.3%	61.9%	41.9%	5	30:47 +7:47	77.0%	14.0 +5.5
Logan Woods	33	18:10	45.2%	4.9	1.8	1.4	0.5	0.1	0.8	1.2	35–62	56.5%	24–76	31.6%	21–31	67.7%	51.4%	53.7%	22.5%	5	16:00 −2:10	40.0%	3.2 −1.7
Andrea Holden	33	14:02	35.0%	5.8	3.8	0.5	0.5	1.2	1.0	1.8	70–124	56.5%	0–1	0.0%†	51–71	71.8%	56.0%	61.1%	56.8%	5	14:02 0:00	35.1%	5.2 −0.6
Sam Alamutu	32	11:16	27.2%	2.5	2.3	1.0	0.7	0.2	0.9	1.3	29–55	52.7%†	3–9	33.3%†	13–21	61.9%†	52.3%†	54.6%†	32.8%†	5	5:03 −6:14	12.6%	0.8 −1.7
Bryan Etumnu	15	10:24	11.8%	3.0	2.3	0.3	0.1	0.2	0.3	0.7	7–18	38.9%†	9–30	30.0%†	4–6	66.7%†	42.7%†	44.4%†	12.5%†	2	2:30 −7:54	2.5%	0.0 −3.0
Alex BruskotterUnder 100 minutes	13	6:57	6.8%	3.2	1.2	0.2	0.2	0.0	0.4	0.6	5–9	55.6%†	6–9	66.7%†	14–18	77.8%†	77.8%†	81.0%†	100.0%†	3	3:22 −3:35	5.0%	0.0 −3.2
Ayden DavisFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	0:24	0.0%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	33 games			79.8	34.5	13.2	not published	4.4	11.2	not published	687–1268	54.2%	240–659	36.4%	538–720	74.7%	54.3%	58.7%	37.4%
Sum of players				79.8	30.9	13.2	7.1	4.4	10.7	17.4	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.5	0.0	not published	0.0	+0.4	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $190K; 80% Range $65K to $515K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $175K to $255K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 12; 1 floor only

The widest scenario range, $88K to $660K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Dominic Pangonis	68.2%	$22K	$6K to $67K	12.9%	$20K to $30K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Solomon Callaghan	68.1%	$6K	$1K to $30K	4.4%	$5K to $7K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
TJ Burch	62.6%	$22K	$7K to $66K	12.5%	$20K to $29K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Michael Imariagbe	60.0%	$40K	$12K to $125K	18.9%	$35K to $52K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kellen Pickett	58.9%	$26K	$8K to $77K	13.3%	$23K to $35K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Michael Cooper	57.1%	$17K	$5K to $51K	10.3%	$15K to $23K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Logan Woods	45.3%	$9K	$2K to $33K	6.4%	$8K to $12K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Andrea Holden	34.5%	$13K	$4K to $42K	7.4%	$12K to $18K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Sam Alamutu	26.9%	$8K	$2K to $26K	4.9%	$7K to $11K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Bryan Etumnu	11.2%	$4K	$1K to $12K	2.5%	$4K to $6K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Alex Bruskotter	7.2%	$4K	$1K to $11K	2.1%	$4K to $5K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ayden Davis	0.0%	$2K	$0 to $4K	0.8%	$1K to $2K	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$190K	$65K to $515K	100%	$175K to $255K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Wright State University-Main Campus (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,583,303	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$2,583,303
Athletics department expenses	$11,873,145
Athletics department revenue	$11,873,145

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 33 games, 2,282 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	79.8	75.6
Field goals made	28.1	27.1
Field goals attempted	58.4	58.3
3-pointers made	7.3	6.9
3-pointers attempted	20.0	20.2
Free throws made	16.3	14.5
Free throws attempted	21.8	19.4
Offensive rebounds	10.9	9.8
Defensive rebounds	23.6	22.3
Total rebounds	34.5	32.1
Assists	13.2	12.1
Blocks	4.4	3.5
Turnovers	11.2	11.5
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 235.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 574.
Minutes (derived)	200.8	not published

33 of 33 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,632	2,632	0	±13.2	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	927	927	0	±4.6	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,927	1,927	0	±9.6	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	240	240	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	659	659	0	±3.3	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	538	538	0	±2.7	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	720	720	0	±3.6	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,137	1,020	+117	±91.0	0
Assists	Reconciled	435	435	0	±2.2	0
Blocks	Reconciled	144	144	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	368	354	+14	±11.0	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	235	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	574	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,625	6,603	+22.4	±132.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Dominic Pangonis	68.2%	+1.5range +0.5 to +2.7Sufficient evidence
Solomon Callaghan	68.1%	-1.4range -2.6 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
TJ Burch	62.6%	+1.6range +0.6 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Michael Imariagbe	60.0%	+3.7range +2.3 to +4.8Sufficient evidence
Kellen Pickett	58.9%	+2.1range +1.0 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Michael Cooper	57.1%	+1.2range +0.3 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Logan Woods	45.3%	+0.2range -1.1 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Andrea Holden	34.5%	+1.8range +0.3 to +3.0Sufficient evidence
Sam Alamutu	26.9%	+0.8range -0.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Bryan Etumnu	11.2%	+0.9range -0.0 to +1.6Limited evidence
Alex Bruskotter	7.2%	+1.6range +0.9 to +2.3Limited evidence
Ayden Davis	0.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.7range +9.8 to +11.7Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 100.0% of on-court time. 1 without a value (under 300 possessions) holds 0.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 3.7%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value