Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Cleveland St.

Horz · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 337 · Raw net -14.1 · Tempo 71.4 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-04

All seasons
Record
8–22
8 wins
AdjNet
-13.1β
rank 329 of 365
AdjO
108.1β
rank 181 of 365
AdjD
121.2β
rank 363 of 365
AdjT
70.4β
SOS
-1.1β
rank 200 of 363
NCSOS
3.9β
WAB
-16.0β
rank 329 of 363
RR
0.9β
Exp. W
7.1β

Scouting Report

CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.110.1134124.1364108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%54.26257.236051.4
TO / 100 poss.17.826215.127916.7
Offensive rebound %27.029436.635630.6
FTA / FGA %37.910435.519635.0
Shooting
3P%37.52136.230833.9
2P%52.016859.536251.7
FT%76.24975.934272.5
Style
3PA / FGA %50.844.039.5
Assists / FGM %57.958.652.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %7.414.49.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %41.633.731.4
2-pointers %37.347.248.8
Free throws %21.019.119.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
9.7
Top Three Share of Minutes
39%
Bench Share of Minutes
39%
Players with Logged Minutes
14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03Loyola ChicagoL 88–9171.9Away0–1
11-10NorthwesternL 63–11073.8Away0–2
11-15Kent St.L 95–10276.0Neutral0–3
11-16RadfordW 87–8282.0Neutral1–3
11-19ValparaisoL 75–9069.2Home1–4
11-22Kent St.L 71–9178.2Away1–5
11-28MissouriL 59–8670.7Away1–6
12-03Northern Ky.L 80–9571.7Away1–7
12-06Detroit MercyL 59–7163.3Home1–8
12-17UABL 77–10174.0Away1–9
12-21MilwaukeeL 71–8164.6Home1–10
12-29IU IndyW 99–8676.0Home2–10
01-04Purdue Fort WayneL 71–7467.1Away2–11
01-09OaklandL 74–9774.8Away2–12
01-11Detroit MercyL 84–9475.6Away2–13
01-15Green BayL 73–8861.2Home2–14
01-17Youngstown St.W 80–7869.1Home3–14
01-21Wright St.W 85–7969.0Away4–14
01-30Green BayW 89–8265.4Away5–14
02-01MilwaukeeW 90–8869.6Away6–14
02-04OaklandW 91–7871.3Home7–14
02-07IU IndyL 74–8275.0Away7–15
02-12Robert MorrisL 68–8562.8Home7–16
02-15Wright St.L 90–10274.2Home7–17
02-18Youngstown St.L 82–10670.2Away7–18
02-22Purdue Fort WayneL 86–9276.2Home7–19
02-25Northern Ky.L 70–8172.2Home7–20
02-28Robert MorrisL 64–8363.9Away7–21
03-02IU IndyW 101–9383.0Home8–21
03-04Wright St.L 61–9069.2Away8–22

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

MinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Tre Beard2831:0372.5%12.73.13.41.10.01.12.126–5944.1%80–19241.7%64–7486.5%58.2%62.8%29.5%532:25 +1:2281.0%9.4 −3.3
Jaidon Lipscomb3027:3468.9%13.43.02.81.20.31.92.333–6055.0%91–21642.1%62–7286.1%61.4%65.2%26.1%529:45 +2:1174.4%14.8 +1.4
Chevalier Emery3021:5554.8%12.61.11.90.40.22.12.377–14951.7%41–11136.9%101–12978.3%53.3%59.7%49.6%525:05 +3:0962.7%14.6 +2.0
Foster Wonders2922:1353.7%5.21.80.80.60.00.31.515–2560.0%38–11233.9%8–1172.7%†52.6%53.6%8.0%422:29 +0:1645.0%5.3 0.0
Dayan Nessah2327:4853.3%15.86.32.41.00.72.92.8107–19056.3%8–2138.1%†125–16277.2%56.4%64.3%76.8%————
Preist Ryan2822:2452.3%6.84.01.10.50.21.22.359–13145.0%6–2030.0%†53–7768.8%45.0%51.1%51.0%526:59 +4:3567.5%13.4 +6.7
Josiah Harris2126:2846.3%9.36.31.90.60.41.22.434–6850.0%30–9033.3%37–4582.2%50.0%54.8%28.5%327:53 +1:2541.8%8.7 −0.6
Holden Pierre-Louis2815:2536.0%3.12.51.00.21.01.42.737–6656.1%†0–20.0%†12–3040.0%54.4%†53.0%†44.1%†514:16 −1:0935.7%3.6 +0.5
Kamari Jones2111:0119.3%4.41.00.40.20.00.41.210–2343.5%†18–5731.6%18–2378.3%†46.3%†51.0%†28.7%†514:17 +3:1535.7%4.4 0.0
David Giddens198:5314.1%3.00.80.30.10.00.30.510–1471.4%†11–3828.9%†4–757.1%†51.0%†51.7%†13.5%†25:38 −3:155.6%0.0 −3.0
Ivan Spirov147:318.8%1.81.50.10.00.00.51.48–1650.0%†3–837.5%†0–0—52.1%†52.1%†0.0%†38:41 +1:1013.0%2.0 +0.2
Manny Hill175:337.9%1.50.70.40.20.00.50.58–2040.0%†1–425.0%†7–1163.6%†39.6%†45.1%†45.8%†47:49 +2:1615.6%3.5 +2.0
Lucas Burton107:156.0%2.20.80.50.20.20.21.19–1369.2%†0–10.0%†4–666.7%†64.3%†66.1%†42.9%†310:30 +3:1515.8%3.3 +1.1
Kevo St.Hilaire124:464.8%1.31.00.20.30.10.30.87–1258.3%†0–0—1–425.0%†58.3%†54.5%†33.3%†24:44 −0:014.7%2.0 +0.8
Team, games with logs · per game30 games78.630.814.82.612.7440–84652.0%327–87237.5%496–65176.2%54.2%58.8%37.9%
Sum of players78.627.014.85.52.612.019.3Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.80.0+0.0+0.8

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$190K
80% Range $68K to $525K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$170K to $245K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
14
2 floor only

The widest scenario range, $88K to $670K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Tre Beard72.6%$15K$1K to $61K12.1%$13K to $19K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaidon Lipscomb69.9%$59K$17K to $220K27.0%$53K to $76K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chevalier Emery54.3%$3K$1K to $19K1.1%$3K to $4K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Foster Wonders53.6%$4K$1K to $27K2.5%$4K to $5K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dayan Nessah53.4%$26K$5K to $88K13.4%$23K to $33K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Preist Ryan53.1%$11K$1K to $47K8.8%$10K to $14K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Josiah Harris46.8%$13K$1K to $52K9.1%$12K to $17K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Holden Pierre-Louis35.9%$5K$1K to $27K4.9%$5K to $7K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kamari Jones19.6%$3K$1K to $13K1.9%$3K to $4K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
David Giddens13.9%$5K$1K to $19K3.3%$5K to $7K$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ivan Spirov8.8%$2K$1K to $8K1.1%$2K to $3K$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Manny Hill7.9%$3K$1K to $9K1.7%$2K to $3K$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Lucas Burton5.8%$1K$0 to $4K0.7%$1K to $2K$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Kevo St.Hilaire4.4%$1K$0 to $4K0.7%$1K to $2K$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$190K$68K to $525K100%$170K to $245K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Cleveland State University (NCAA Division I without football)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$2,667,151
Men's basketball expenses$2,579,603
Athletics department expenses$14,221,496
Athletics department revenue$14,706,331

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 30 games, 2,141 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

StatisticTeamOpponents
Points78.688.6
Field goals made25.630.9
Field goals attempted57.362.7
3-pointers made10.910.0
3-pointers attempted29.127.6
Free throws made16.516.9
Free throws attempted21.722.3
Offensive rebounds9.012.6
Defensive rebounds21.824.4
Total rebounds30.837.0
Assists14.818.1
Blocks2.64.1
Turnovers12.710.8
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 166.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 579.
Minutes (derived)200.0

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,3572,3570±11.80
Field goals madeReconciled7677670±3.80
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,7181,7180±8.60
3-pointers madeReconciled3273270±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled8728720±4.40
Free throws madeReconciled4964960±2.50
Free throws attemptedReconciled6516510±3.30
Offensive reboundsNo player split
Defensive reboundsNo player split
Total reboundsResidual shown925811+114±74.00
AssistsReconciled4444440±2.20
BlocksReconciled7877+1±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown382359+23±11.50
StealsNo team figure166
Personal foulsNo team figure579
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,0005,982+18.0±120.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Tre Beard72.6%-1.1range -2.2 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Jaidon Lipscomb69.9%+1.4range +0.2 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Chevalier Emery54.3%-4.4range -6.0 to -2.5Sufficient evidence
Foster Wonders53.6%-3.1range -4.5 to -1.3Sufficient evidence
Dayan Nessah53.4%+0.2range -0.8 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Preist Ryan53.1%-1.2range -2.3 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Josiah Harris46.8%-0.7range -1.7 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Holden Pierre-Louis35.9%-1.7range -2.6 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Kamari Jones19.6%-2.2range -3.3 to -1.1Sufficient evidence
David Giddens13.9%-0.6range -1.5 to +0.5Limited evidence
Ivan Spirov8.8%-2.5range -3.4 to -1.5Limited evidence
Manny Hill7.9%-1.3range -1.9 to -0.6Limited evidence
Lucas Burton5.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Kevo St.Hilaire4.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+8.1range +7.1 to +9.0Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

12 valued players hold 98.0% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.0%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 6.1%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value