Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Milwaukee

Horz · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 278 · Raw net -7.6 · Tempo 69.1 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-04

All seasons
Record
11–20
11 wins
AdjNet
-6.6β
rank 259 of 365
AdjO
106.6β
rank 211 of 365
AdjD
113.2β
rank 299 of 365
AdjT
68.6β
SOS
-0.1β
rank 168 of 363
NCSOS
6.4β
WAB
-12.7β
rank 277 of 363
RR
-0.4β
Exp. W
11.4β

Scouting Report

CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.108.1180115.7332108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%49.924155.534051.4
TO / 100 poss.15.28215.822616.7
Offensive rebound %33.08829.212130.6
FTA / FGA %32.125535.920735.0
Shooting
3P%32.326636.532833.9
2P%50.822256.032651.7
FT%68.730774.328572.5
Style
3PA / FGA %38.140.239.5
Assists / FGM %48.155.852.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %8.59.59.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %30.332.031.4
2-pointers %51.648.748.8
Free throws %18.119.419.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
11.0
Top Three Share of Minutes
34%
Bench Share of Minutes
47%
Players with Logged Minutes
14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03HamptonW 90–8679.6Home1–0
11-08WoffordL 76–8674.1Away1–1
11-10Little RockW 92–7269.5Home2–1
11-12IndianaL 70–10170.7Away2–2
11-14Texas TechL 63–8064.9Away2–3
11-22Wichita St.L 58–7566.9Away2–4
11-29AkronL 81–10577.8Away2–5
12-06Robert MorrisW 74–7271.2Home3–5
12-14Indiana St.L 68–7065.4Home3–6
12-19South Dakota St.W 88–8768.6Neutral4–6
12-21Cleveland St.W 81–7164.6Away5–6
12-29Purdue Fort WayneW 77–5567.4Home6–6
12-30WisconsinL 60–8074.6Away6–7
01-01Wright St.L 70–7665.0Away6–8
01-05Green BayL 76–7963.4Away6–9
01-09Northern Ky.L 67–8563.8Home6–10
01-11IU IndyW 95–8369.3Home7–10
01-15OaklandL 60–7374.5Home7–11
01-18Purdue Fort WayneL 82–10073.0Away7–12
01-22Robert MorrisL 76–8870.2Away7–13
01-24Youngstown St.W 65–6467.5Away8–13
01-30Wright St.L 69–7672.8Home8–14
02-01Cleveland St.L 88–9069.6Home8–15
02-04Detroit MercyL 63–7663.9Home8–16
02-07Northern Ky.L 62–6762.6Away8–17
02-10IU IndyW 92–8877.5Away9–17
02-15Green BayW 75–7261.6Home10–17
02-20Detroit MercyL 86–9170.2Away10–18
02-22OaklandL 70–8165.4Away10–19
02-25Youngstown St.W 78–6568.5Home11–19
03-04Detroit MercyL 63–8467.2Away11–20

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

MinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Aaron Franklin3125:2663.6%6.86.41.10.80.20.72.474–12360.2%10–2835.7%†32–7244.4%58.9%57.5%47.7%528:01 +2:3570.0%7.2 +0.4
Isaiah Dorceus3021:5753.1%5.31.53.60.70.01.61.535–9038.9%23–7331.5%21–3363.6%42.6%45.1%20.2%515:11 −6:4738.0%4.6 −0.7
Stevie Elam2526:1252.8%10.54.70.81.00.30.52.033–7444.6%51–14435.4%43–5381.1%50.2%54.3%24.3%533:01 +6:4982.5%14.4 +3.9
Amar Augillard3020:4850.3%12.32.51.10.80.21.92.066–14346.2%55–17132.2%73–8783.9%47.3%52.5%27.7%418:59 −1:5038.0%9.3 −3.1
Esyah Pippa-White3118:2946.2%4.31.72.10.40.01.01.420–5834.5%20–8224.4%34–6056.7%35.7%40.3%42.9%528:23 +9:5471.0%6.8 +2.5
Josh Dixon3118:2646.1%9.01.01.50.50.11.31.772–16443.9%28–9230.4%50–5886.2%44.5%49.4%22.7%514:22 −4:0435.9%4.8 −4.2
Chandler Jackson2422:3243.6%9.72.80.91.00.31.11.457–8964.0%23–7032.9%50–6379.4%57.5%62.4%39.6%531:11 +8:3877.9%17.4 +7.7
Danilo Jovanovich1630:4039.6%12.36.12.20.90.41.11.877–13357.9%7–1353.8%†22–3171.0%59.9%61.7%21.2%————
Faizon Fields2021:3634.8%6.55.50.40.80.51.03.540–6958.0%†2–366.7%†43–7259.7%59.7%†62.2%†100.0%†420:28 −1:0940.9%5.0 −1.5
Sekou Konneh3013:0631.7%6.14.60.20.50.90.71.978–13856.5%1–911.1%†23–3860.5%54.1%55.6%25.9%516:57 +3:5142.4%7.8 +1.7
Seth Hubbard831:5120.6%16.52.92.10.90.41.13.035–7447.3%14–3836.8%†20–2871.4%50.0%53.1%25.0%————
Tate MacKenzie196:3310.0%0.81.20.10.10.50.31.55–1145.5%†0–0—6–1250.0%†45.5%†49.1%†109.1%†————
Simeon Murchison164:335.9%0.60.80.10.10.20.30.74–944.4%†0–0—2–366.7%†44.4%†48.4%†33.3%†22:09 −2:242.1%0.0 −0.6
Austin Villarreal31:250.3%0.71.30.00.00.00.00.01–1100.0%†0–20.0%†0–0—33.3%†33.3%†0.0%†————
Team, games with logs · per game31 games74.735.512.93.010.5597–117650.8%234–72532.3%419–61068.7%49.9%53.4%32.1%
Sum of players74.732.012.96.53.010.218.7Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.50.00.0+0.4

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$200K
80% Range $76K to $540K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$185K to $260K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
14
2 floor only

The widest scenario range, $97K to $675K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Aaron Franklin64.6%$21K$3K to $67K12.4%$19K to $27K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Dorceus53.3%$7K$1K to $31K4.8%$6K to $9K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Stevie Elam52.9%$24K$5K to $80K12.4%$22K to $31K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Amar Augillard51.4%$6K$1K to $28K3.7%$5K to $7K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Esyah Pippa-White46.3%$16K$2K to $55K9.3%$15K to $21K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Josh Dixon45.5%$4K$1K to $20K1.5%$3K to $5K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chandler Jackson44.6%$30K$9K to $105K13.8%$28K to $39K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Danilo Jovanovich38.6%$23K$7K to $76K10.7%$21K to $30K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Faizon Fields34.7%$20K$6K to $70K9.5%$19K to $26K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Sekou Konneh31.8%$7K$1K to $28K4.8%$6K to $9K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Seth Hubbard19.8%$5K$1K to $17K3.6%$5K to $7K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tate MacKenzie10.3%$3K$1K to $9K1.7%$2K to $4K$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Simeon Murchison5.9%$1K$0 to $4K0.7%$1K to $2K$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Austin Villarreal0.3%$1K$0 to $4K0.7%$1K to $2K$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$200K$76K to $540K100%$185K to $260K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (NCAA Division I without football)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$2,879,547Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$2,879,547
Athletics department expenses$15,230,163
Athletics department revenue$15,230,163

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 31 games, 2,141 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

StatisticTeamOpponents
Points74.779.9
Field goals made26.828.0
Field goals attempted61.358.1
3-pointers made7.58.5
3-pointers attempted23.423.3
Free throws made13.515.5
Free throws attempted19.720.8
Offensive rebounds12.49.5
Defensive rebounds23.125.1
Total rebounds35.534.6
Assists12.915.6
Blocks3.03.6
Turnovers10.510.9
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 202.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 579.
Minutes (derived)200.0

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,3152,3150±11.60
Field goals madeReconciled8318310±4.20
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,9011,9010±9.50
3-pointers madeReconciled2342340±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled7257250±3.60
Free throws madeReconciled4194190±2.10
Free throws attemptedReconciled6106100±3.10
Offensive reboundsNo player split
Defensive reboundsNo player split
Total reboundsResidual shown1,101993+108±88.10
AssistsReconciled4004000±2.00
BlocksReconciled92920±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown326315+11±9.80
StealsNo team figure202
Personal foulsNo team figure579
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,2006,183+16.7±124.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Aaron Franklin64.6%+0.1range -1.1 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Dorceus53.3%-1.7range -3.2 to -0.3Sufficient evidence
Stevie Elam52.9%+0.9range -0.6 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Amar Augillard51.4%-2.1range -3.7 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Esyah Pippa-White46.3%+0.1range -1.2 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Josh Dixon45.5%-3.2range -4.6 to -1.6Sufficient evidence
Chandler Jackson44.6%+1.8range +0.1 to +3.1Sufficient evidence
Danilo Jovanovich38.6%+1.3range +0.3 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Faizon Fields34.7%+1.2range +0.1 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Sekou Konneh31.8%-0.9range -2.1 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Seth Hubbard19.8%-0.6range -1.3 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Tate MacKenzie10.3%-1.3range -2.3 to -0.4Limited evidence
Simeon Murchison5.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Austin Villarreal0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+9.0range +8.2 to +9.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

12 valued players hold 98.8% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.1%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value