IU Indy

Horz · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 320 · Raw net -11.0 · Tempo 74.9 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-02

Record: 5–25; 5 wins
AdjNet: -11.3β; rank 315 of 365
AdjO: 105.5β; rank 238 of 365
AdjD: 116.9β; rank 343 of 365
AdjT: 73.7β
SOS: -2.1β; rank 231 of 363
NCSOS: 0.5β
WAB: -19.3β; rank 356 of 363
RR: -4.0β
Exp. W: 9.0β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	107.5197	118.5352	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.2136	58.2362	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.9128	19.241	16.7
Offensive rebound %	28.7242	35.6348	30.6
FTA / FGA %	21.7365	46.6356	35.0
Shooting
3P%	32.4258	38.5361	33.9
2P%	54.862	58.4354	51.7
FT%	72.1205	74.3284	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	42.1	35.7	39.5
Assists / FGM %	62.1	52.0	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	7.6	8.1	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	34.1	27.4	31.4
2-pointers %	52.8	49.7	48.8
Free throws %	13.0	22.9	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.8
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 32%
Players with Logged Minutes: 15

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Ohio St.	L 102–118	85.8	Away	0–1
11-06	LIU	L 90–94	86.5	Home	0–2
11-08	Butler	L 80–112	90.3	Away	0–3
11-14	Eastern Mich.	W 90–83	78.6	Away	1–3
11-18	Charleston So.	L 91–103	82.4	Away	1–4
11-21	Alabama St.	L 80–101	80.1	Neutral	1–5
11-23	Air Force	L 85–98	78.8	Away	1–6
11-29	Morehead St.	W 85–80	81.7	Home	2–6
12-03	Detroit Mercy	L 78–92	71.1	Away	2–7
12-06	Youngstown St.	L 55–78	66.8	Home	2–8
12-11	Green Bay	L 75–85	73.0	Home	2–9
12-22	Grand Canyon	L 78–91	75.2	Away	2–10
12-29	Cleveland St.	L 86–99	76.0	Away	2–11
01-01	Northern Ky.	L 72–81	70.4	Away	2–12
01-04	Wright St.	L 77–81	67.0	Home	2–13
01-09	Green Bay	L 59–75	72.0	Away	2–14
01-11	Milwaukee	L 83–95	69.3	Away	2–15
01-15	Robert Morris	W 96–93 1OT	78.7	Home	3–15
01-17	Detroit Mercy	L 77–80	75.0	Home	3–16
01-21	Oakland	W 103–85	71.3	Away	4–16
01-28	Robert Morris	L 58–74	59.6	Away	4–17
01-30	Youngstown St.	L 76–85	73.3	Away	4–18
02-07	Cleveland St.	W 82–74	75.0	Home	5–18
02-10	Milwaukee	L 88–92	77.5	Home	5–19
02-12	Northern Ky.	L 81–84	70.7	Home	5–20
02-15	Purdue Fort Wayne	L 78–83	75.0	Away	5–21
02-19	Wright St.	L 73–85	71.2	Away	5–22
02-25	Oakland	L 74–86	72.6	Home	5–23
02-28	Purdue Fort Wayne	L 81–87	69.6	Home	5–24
03-02	Cleveland St.	L 93–101	83.0	Away	5–25

Roster · 15 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Finley Woodward	30	31:34	78.6%	8.7	5.3	6.6	0.9	0.4	2.2	2.8	113–227	49.8%	0–1	0.0%†	35–51	68.6%	49.6%	52.1%	22.4%	5	34:22 +2:48	85.9%	7.4 −1.3
Kyler D'Augustino	28	33:03	76.8%	19.2	3.4	3.3	1.3	0.1	2.0	3.1	177–309	57.3%	38–97	39.2%	69–87	79.3%	57.6%	60.4%	21.4%	5	33:51 +0:48	84.6%	16.2 −3.0
Maguire Mitchell	30	26:46	66.6%	11.9	2.3	1.0	1.2	0.6	0.9	3.1	47–78	60.3%	78–220	35.5%	28–36	77.8%	55.0%	56.7%	12.1%	5	34:21 +7:35	85.9%	18.8 +6.9
Micah Davis	30	25:52	64.4%	9.5	2.1	2.9	1.2	0.1	1.8	2.2	57–107	53.3%	49–157	31.2%	24–36	66.7%	49.4%	50.9%	13.6%	5	29:29 +3:37	73.7%	13.6 +4.1
Jaxon Edwards	28	23:09	53.8%	11.4	5.6	1.7	1.0	0.7	1.8	2.7	120–202	59.4%	9–40	22.5%†	52–70	74.3%	55.2%	58.5%	28.9%	5	22:26 −0:43	56.1%	11.0 −0.4
Kameron Tinsley	27	17:32	39.3%	7.7	2.4	0.9	0.6	0.4	0.9	3.0	18–34	52.9%	43–126	34.1%	42–51	82.4%	51.6%	56.7%	31.9%	5	16:16 −1:17	40.7%	6.8 −0.9
Aiden Miller	27	14:52	33.3%	4.6	3.9	0.8	0.6	0.2	0.8	2.1	13–25	52.0%	27–88	30.7%	16–27	59.3%	47.3%	49.2%	23.9%	5	13:32 −1:20	33.8%	4.0 −0.6
Matt Compas	29	13:33	32.6%	6.5	1.3	1.1	0.7	0.3	0.9	1.2	73–137	53.3%	7–32	21.9%†	21–32	65.6%	49.4%	51.3%	18.9%	4	5:26 −8:07	10.9%	1.5 −5.0
Reece Hagy	29	10:45	25.9%	2.1	1.8	0.7	0.4	0.2	0.2	1.5	15–26	57.7%†	6–29	20.7%†	13–23	56.5%†	43.6%†	46.8%†	41.8%†	5	8:10 −2:36	20.4%	0.2 −1.9
JP Dragas	13	14:58	16.2%	5.5	1.5	1.3	0.9	0.0	0.9	2.0	5–10	50.0%†	17–49	34.7%†	10–14	71.4%†	51.7%†	54.5%†	23.7%†	—	—	—	—
Gabe StewartUnder 100 minutes	10	5:25	4.5%	1.0	2.1	0.0	0.0	0.3	0.3	0.6	2–10	20.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	3–6	50.0%†	25.0%†	30.0%†	42.9%†	—	—	—	—
Lav Cvetkovic'Under 100 minutes	10	4:47	4.0%	0.4	0.7	0.0	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.5	0–1	0.0%†	1–5	20.0%†	1–3	33.3%†	25.0%†	27.3%†	50.0%†	1	1:23 −3:24	0.7%	3.0 +2.6
Ajay HolubarFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	2:19	1.3%	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.4	0.1	1–2	50.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	33.3%†	33.3%†	0.0%†	3	2:53 +0:34	4.3%	0.0 −0.3
Corey BostonFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	1:44	0.7%	0.4	0.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.2	0.0	0–2	0.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	2–2	100.0%†	0.0%†	20.5%†	50.0%†	1	1:12 −0:32	0.6%	0.0 −0.4
Garrett SeverFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	0:52	0.1%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per game	30 games			80.9	31.5	19.0	not published	2.9	11.9	not published	641–1170	54.8%	276–851	32.4%	316–438	72.1%	52.2%	54.8%	21.7%
Sum of players				80.9	28.2	18.9	8.0	2.9	11.6	22.0	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.3	+0.0	not published	0.0	+0.3	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $170K; 80% Range $65K to $485K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $155K to $240K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 15; 5 floor only

The widest scenario range, $92K to $630K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Finley Woodward	77.8%	$31K	$6K to $110K	18.2%	$28K to $44K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kyler D'Augustino	77.7%	$14K	$1K to $58K	12.5%	$12K to $20K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Maguire Mitchell	66.6%	$17K	$1K to $65K	12.5%	$15K to $24K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Micah Davis	62.7%	$9K	$1K to $44K	7.8%	$8K to $12K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaxon Edwards	54.0%	$4K	$1K to $25K	3.4%	$4K to $6K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kameron Tinsley	39.0%	$7K	$1K to $29K	6.0%	$6K to $10K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Aiden Miller	34.1%	$10K	$1K to $37K	6.8%	$9K to $13K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Matt Compas	33.0%	$4K	$1K to $18K	3.2%	$3K to $5K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Reece Hagy	26.9%	$31K	$8K to $155K	14.3%	$26K to $41K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
JP Dragas	17.0%	$3K	$1K to $12K	2.5%	$3K to $4K	$1K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Gabe Stewart	4.7%	$1K	$0 to $3K	0.7%	$1K to $2K	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Lav Cvetkovic'	4.0%	$1K	$0 to $3K	0.7%	$1K to $2K	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Ajay Holubar	1.5%	$1K	$0 to $3K	0.7%	$1K to $2K	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Corey Boston	0.9%	$1K	$0 to $3K	0.7%	$1K to $2K	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Garrett Sever	0.1%	$1K	$0 to $3K	0.7%	$1K to $2K	$1K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$170K	$65K to $485K	100%	$155K to $240K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Indiana University-Indianapolis (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$2,606,361	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$2,606,361
Athletics department expenses	$11,519,345
Athletics department revenue	$11,519,345

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 30 games, 2,257 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	80.9	89.2
Field goals made	30.6	30.3
Field goals attempted	67.4	59.0
3-pointers made	9.2	8.1
3-pointers attempted	28.4	21.1
Free throws made	10.5	20.4
Free throws attempted	14.6	27.5
Offensive rebounds	10.9	11.4
Defensive rebounds	20.7	27.0
Total rebounds	31.5	38.4
Assists	19.0	15.8
Blocks	2.9	3.2
Turnovers	11.9	14.4
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 239.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 660.
Minutes (derived)	200.8	not published

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,426	2,426	0	±12.1	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	917	917	0	±4.6	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,021	2,021	0	±10.1	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	276	276	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	851	851	0	±4.3	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	316	316	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	438	438	0	±2.2	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	946	847	+99	±75.7	0
Assists	Reconciled	569	568	+1	±2.8	0
Blocks	Reconciled	87	87	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Reconciled	358	349	+9	±10.7	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	239	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	660	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,025	6,002	+23.0	±120.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Finley Woodward	77.8%	+0.3range -0.7 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Kyler D'Augustino	77.7%	-1.0range -1.8 to +0.0Sufficient evidence
Maguire Mitchell	66.6%	-0.4range -1.8 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Micah Davis	62.7%	-1.5range -3.2 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Jaxon Edwards	54.0%	-2.6range -3.9 to -1.2Sufficient evidence
Kameron Tinsley	39.0%	-1.2range -2.3 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Aiden Miller	34.1%	-0.3range -1.5 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Matt Compas	33.0%	-2.1range -3.3 to -0.7Sufficient evidence
Reece Hagy	26.9%	+2.5range +1.6 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
JP Dragas	17.0%	-1.6range -2.5 to -0.5Sufficient evidence
Gabe Stewart	4.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Lav Cvetkovic'	4.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Ajay Holubar	1.5%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Corey Boston	0.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Garrett Sever	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +8.5range +7.7 to +9.4Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 97.8% of on-court time. 5 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value