Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Michael Imariagbe

Wright St. · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance

Logged performance

787:08 minutes logged

Games logged
32
Minutes per game
24:36
Points per game
11.9
Rebounds / assists per game
7.1 / 1.8
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game11.97.11.80.60.81.93.2
Per 40 minutes19.411.53.00.91.33.05.1
Season totals38222759182560101
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG136–23657.6%7.412.0
2P130–22158.8%6.911.2
3P6–1540.0%†0.50.8
FT104–15268.4%4.87.7
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
58.9%63.1%6.4%64.4%0.98

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensation · 2025–26β

Wright St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.

Speculative best guess
$40K
80% range $12K to $125K
Median share of team pool
18.9%
team pool $190K, 80% range $65K to $515K
Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
$35K to $52K
the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
Floor part
$2K
shared by every player with possessions
Possession share
60.0%
Sufficient evidence
Point and 80% range on the team table's axis. Open circle: limited evidence or floor only.
  • Range driven by assumption, not data

Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.

Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.

Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks

Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.

Wright St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Net points per 100 possessions by season, newest first. The speculative compensation best guess for 2025–26 only sits right after the team, so it is the first figure after the season. Ordered by season, not by value or dollars. Compensation is a best guess of a share of the school’s own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.
SeasonTeamSpeculative compensation (best guess)Compensation 80% rangeSplit roleNetRangeEvidenceRange graphic. Position on one axisOffenseDefenseWins above replacementOn-court possessionsSample and flags
2026Wright St$40Kspeculative$12K to $125Kdescriptive: not used in fit or gates+3.7+2.3 to +4.8Sufficient evidence+1.6+2.1+6.1range +5.3 to +6.82,647Season detail
2025Wright StNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc+1.3+0.4 to +2.1Sufficient evidence+0.5+0.8+2.2range +1.9 to +2.51,381Season detail
2024Houston ChrNone: no budget that season—evaluation: examined, post hoc-2.3-3.0 to -1.6Sufficient evidence-1.7-0.5+0.9range +0.7 to +1.21,684Season detail

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
DateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2026-03-20VirginiaL 73–8229:171910102237-125-90-079.2%
2026-03-10Detroit MercyW 66–6331:25127100234-70-04-857.1%
2026-03-09Northern Ky.W 103–9025:13810200053-30-02-4100.0%
2026-03-04Cleveland St.W 90–6123:20165200325-60-06-783.3%
2026-02-28Northern Ky.W 92–9126:541516300416-80-03-775.0%
2026-02-25Purdue Fort WayneW 74–7021:0976113233-50-01-260.0%
2026-02-22Robert MorrisL 68–8128:3867111352-60-02-233.3%
2026-02-19IU IndyW 85–7329:12196121026-80-07-775.0%
2026-02-15Cleveland St.W 102–9029:421210501235-80-02-262.5%
2026-02-12Detroit MercyL 74–7724:1155400242-70-01-428.6%
2026-02-07Purdue Fort WayneW 73–6829:261916310126-70-07-1285.7%
2026-02-04Robert MorrisL 66–7228:041613131126-150-04-440.0%
2026-02-01Green BayW 83–7513:4741010041-30-02-233.3%
2026-01-30MilwaukeeW 76–6925:51811201124-70-00-157.1%
2026-01-24Northern Ky.W 88–8029:112411120207-100-010-1270.0%
2026-01-21Cleveland St.L 79–8516:07109500254-60-02-366.7%
2026-01-11OaklandW 94–848:4124200201-10-00-0100.0%
2026-01-09Detroit MercyW 84–8226:43102211253-70-04-542.9%
2026-01-04IU IndyW 81–7728:20195102318-120-03-566.7%
2026-01-01MilwaukeeW 76–7025:29174111114-100-09-1040.0%
2025-12-29OaklandW 88–7328:49153303254-70-07-957.1%
2025-12-22Eastern Mich.W 70–6422:57138201134-60-05-966.7%
2025-12-16Miami (OH)L 76–8322:37167101355-60-06-883.3%
2025-12-13MarshallL 74–7618:4025100121-50-10-020.0%
2025-12-07Green BayW 86–5817:26142300047-70-00-0100.0%
2025-12-03Youngstown St.L 68–6922:39153101143-70-09-1442.9%
2025-11-28 · NCAAButlerL 69–9424:54613001453-90-10-033.3%
2025-11-25StetsonW 79–6224:33137321136-91-20-072.2%
2025-11-16Kent St.L 72–7626:1072210253-40-01-475.0%
2025-11-15RadfordW 92–5925:36610210533-100-00-130.0%
2025-11-11ToledoL 71–8131:33175102547-90-13-477.8%
2025-11-06CaliforniaL 67–7720:34104111053-90-14-633.3%