Akron

MAC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 17 · Raw net 16.0 · Tempo 71.1 · 33 Division I games · Through 2026-03-20

Record: 27–6; 27 wins
AdjNet: 12.5β; rank 50 of 365
AdjO: 118.4β; rank 34 of 365
AdjD: 105.9β; rank 112 of 365
AdjT: 70.7β
SOS: -1.6β; rank 213 of 363
NCSOS: -1.0β
WAB: 0.9β; rank 45 of 363
RR: 0.9β
Exp. W: 26.1β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	121.67	105.597	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	58.29	51.2172	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.5103	18.386	16.7
Offensive rebound %	33.478	29.9156	30.6
FTA / FGA %	29.2324	30.474	35.0
Shooting
3P%	38.215	35.5284	33.9
2P%	58.815	49.684	51.7
FT%	75.470	71.9154	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	44.8	43.1	39.5
Assists / FGM %	57.0	51.0	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.5	8.5	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	37.1	37.0	31.4
2-pointers %	46.9	45.4	48.8
Free throws %	15.9	17.6	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes: 44%
Bench Share of Minutes: 32%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	James Madison	W 85–71	72.0	Home	1–0
11-08	Princeton	W 104–69	77.2	Home	2–0
11-16	Purdue	L 79–97	72.5	Away	2–1
11-21	Iona	W 96–75	77.2	Neutral	3–1
11-23	Evansville	W 97–59	69.9	Neutral	4–1
11-24	Yale	L 94–97	66.1	Neutral	4–2
11-29	Milwaukee	W 105–81	77.8	Home	5–2
12-03	Bucknell	W 97–77	68.6	Home	6–2
12-06	Tulane	W 88–71	70.8	Away	7–2
12-13	Murray St.	L 100–115	82.4	Neutral	7–3
12-19	Eastern Mich.	W 93–72	71.0	Home	8–3
01-03	Miami (OH)	L 73–76	71.5	Away	8–4
01-06	Central Mich.	W 82–69	71.1	Home	9–4
01-09	Bowling Green	W 77–67	72.1	Away	10–4
01-13	Ball St.	W 87–77	68.8	Home	11–4
01-17	Western Mich.	W 104–89	68.0	Home	12–4
01-20	Buffalo	W 82–63	70.1	Away	13–4
01-23	Ohio	W 86–65	73.6	Away	14–4
01-27	Toledo	W 91–81	69.9	Home	15–4
01-30	Kent St.	W 69–52	68.3	Home	16–4
02-03	Eastern Mich.	W 66–64	69.4	Away	17–4
02-07	Troy	L 69–79	64.1	Away	17–5
02-13	Massachusetts	W 99–92	78.3	Home	18–5
02-17	Western Mich.	W 90–73	67.9	Away	19–5
02-20	Ball St.	W 78–65	67.2	Away	20–5
02-24	Buffalo	W 99–85	80.2	Home	21–5
02-27	Kent St.	W 92–70	70.4	Away	22–5
03-03	Central Mich.	W 77–64	68.0	Away	23–5
03-06	NIU	W 94–55	69.2	Home	24–5
03-12	Buffalo	W 73–70	69.5	Neutral	25–5
03-13	Kent St.	W 75–68	68.3	Neutral	26–5
03-14	Toledo	W 79–76	68.2	Neutral	27–5
03-20	Texas Tech	L 71–91	65.3	—	27–6

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 33 of 33 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Tavari Johnson	33	32:10	80.4%	24.7	3.5	6.2	1.5	0.3	3.2	1.6	170–287	59.2%	70–186	37.6%	105–121	86.8%	58.1%	62.2%	25.6%	5	32:43 +0:33	81.8%	14.4 −5.4
Evan Mahaffey	33	29:00	72.5%	13.6	7.8	4.7	2.3	1.0	1.8	3.3	127–205	62.0%	12–43	27.9%†	35–62	56.5%	58.5%	59.0%	25.0%	5	31:37 +2:37	79.0%	10.6 +0.8
Shammah Scott	33	27:04	67.6%	18.9	3.5	4.0	0.4	0.1	1.7	1.3	71–146	48.6%	79–185	42.7%	44–57	77.2%	57.3%	59.4%	17.2%	5	30:28 +3:25	76.2%	14.0 +1.2
Amani Lyles	33	26:48	67.0%	22.6	11.8	3.2	1.4	1.1	3.4	4.3	133–203	65.5%	46–122	37.7%	95–131	72.5%	62.2%	65.2%	40.3%	5	30:37 +3:49	76.5%	15.6 +0.5
Eric Mahaffey	32	21:59	53.3%	14.7	10.5	2.9	1.3	1.0	1.6	4.2	70–118	59.3%	25–63	39.7%	43–57	75.4%	59.4%	62.6%	31.5%	5	17:08 −4:51	42.8%	5.4 −2.7
Bowen Hardman	33	18:31	46.3%	16.1	3.2	0.5	0.2	0.0	0.8	1.4	8–17	47.1%	71–171	41.5%	17–21	81.0%†	60.9%	62.4%	11.2%	5	22:38 +4:07	56.6%	9.2 +1.7
Sharron Young	32	18:54	45.8%	15.0	5.4	3.2	2.5	0.1	1.6	4.4	32–64	50.0%	39–114	34.2%	46–56	82.1%	50.8%	56.0%	31.5%	5	18:35 −0:19	46.5%	6.2 −0.9
Zach Halligan	32	11:23	27.6%	8.9	7.4	1.9	1.5	0.1	0.9	4.8	17–27	63.0%†	9–31	29.0%†	20–25	80.0%	52.6%†	58.7%†	43.1%†	5	6:12 −5:12	15.5%	1.0 −1.5
Marvin Musiime-Kamali	33	8:19	20.8%	8.2	8.6	2.0	2.5	0.6	1.5	7.3	21–32	65.6%†	0–0	—	14–22	63.6%†	65.6%†	67.2%†	68.8%†	5	5:48 −2:31	14.5%	0.8 −0.9
Halil Barre	17	6:06	7.8%	18.5	11.6	0.4	0.8	3.5	4.2	7.7	12–17	70.6%†	0–0	—	24–31	77.4%	70.6%†	78.3%†	182.4%†	2	4:19 −1:47	4.3%	0.0 −2.8
Ognjen StankovicUnder 100 minutes	16	5:59	7.3%	11.3	8.4	2.5	2.1	0.8	3.8	2.9	7–15	46.7%†	1–4	25.0%†	10–17	58.8%†	44.7%†	51.0%†	89.5%†	2	2:40 −3:19	2.7%	1.0 −0.7
Conner GroceUnder 100 minutes	11	1:21	1.1%	16.1	2.7	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	8.0	1–4	25.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	1–2	50.0%†	31.3%†	33.8%†	25.0%†	2	1:30 +0:09	1.5%	2.0 +1.5
Rich BriscoFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	1:45	1.1%	0.0	8.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	5.7	5.7	0–3	0.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	2	1:30 −0:15	1.5%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	33 games			86.4	36.8	17.7	not published	2.9	11.0	not published	669–1138	58.8%	353–923	38.2%	454–602	75.4%	58.2%	61.3%	29.2%
Sum of players				86.4	33.7	17.7	7.2	2.9	10.5	16.2	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.0	−0.0	not published	0.0	+0.5	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $275K; 80% Range $100K to $745K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $270K to $290K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 2 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Tavari Johnson	81.1%	$53K	$18K to $150K	18.3%	$52K to $56K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Evan Mahaffey	73.2%	$50K	$18K to $145K	17.5%	$48K to $53K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Amani Lyles	67.7%	$37K	$12K to $105K	13.4%	$36K to $39K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Shammah Scott	67.3%	$21K	$5K to $67K	9.2%	$20K to $22K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Eric Mahaffey	54.1%	$42K	$14K to $125K	14.3%	$40K to $44K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Bowen Hardman	46.1%	$14K	$4K to $44K	6.0%	$14K to $15K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Sharron Young	45.7%	$23K	$7K to $67K	8.7%	$22K to $24K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Zach Halligan	28.0%	$8K	$2K to $26K	3.4%	$8K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Marvin Musiime-Kamali	20.5%	$5K	$1K to $17K	2.1%	$5K in all four	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Halil Barre	7.6%	$4K	$2K to $13K	1.7%	$4K to $5K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ognjen Stankovic	7.1%	$3K	$1K to $9K	1.2%	$3K in all four	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Conner Groce	0.9%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Rich Brisco	0.9%	$2K	$1K to $6K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$275K	$100K to $745K	100%	$270K to $290K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Akron Main Campus (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$3,258,454	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$3,258,454
Athletics department expenses	$33,581,788
Athletics department revenue	$33,581,790

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 33 games, 2,345 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1320 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	86.4	75.0
Field goals made	31.0	26.3
Field goals attempted	62.5	60.3
3-pointers made	10.7	9.2
3-pointers attempted	28.0	26.0
Free throws made	13.8	13.2
Free throws attempted	18.2	18.4
Offensive rebounds	11.1	11.0
Defensive rebounds	25.7	22.1
Total rebounds	36.8	33.1
Assists	17.7	13.4
Blocks	2.9	2.9
Turnovers	11.0	13.0
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 237.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 534.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

33 of 33 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,851	2,851	0	±14.3	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	1,022	1,022	0	±5.1	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,061	2,061	0	±10.3	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	353	353	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	923	923	0	±4.6	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	454	454	0	±2.3	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	602	602	0	±3.0	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,213	1,113	+100	±97.0	0
Assists	Reconciled	583	584	−1	±2.9	0
Blocks	Reconciled	96	96	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	363	346	+17	±10.9	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	237	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	534	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,600	6,582	+17.8	±132.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Tavari Johnson	81.1%	+3.9range +2.5 to +5.0Sufficient evidence
Evan Mahaffey	73.2%	+4.1range +2.9 to +5.0Sufficient evidence
Amani Lyles	67.7%	+3.0range +2.0 to +4.3Sufficient evidence
Shammah Scott	67.3%	+1.3range -0.1 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Eric Mahaffey	54.1%	+4.7range +3.1 to +6.1Sufficient evidence
Bowen Hardman	46.1%	+1.0range -0.0 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
Sharron Young	45.7%	+2.6range +1.3 to +4.0Sufficient evidence
Zach Halligan	28.0%	+0.4range -0.9 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Marvin Musiime-Kamali	20.5%	-0.3range -1.7 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Halil Barre	7.6%	+1.3range +0.9 to +1.9Limited evidence
Ognjen Stankovic	7.1%	-0.5range -1.4 to +0.3Limited evidence
Conner Groce	0.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Rich Brisco	0.9%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +12.1range +11.1 to +12.9Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.7% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.9%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value