Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Princeton

Ivy · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 280 · Raw net -7.6 · Tempo 64.5 · 28 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

All seasons
Record
8–20
8 wins
AdjNet
-5.7β
rank 251 of 365
AdjO
104.6β
rank 259 of 365
AdjD
110.3β
rank 232 of 365
AdjT
65.4β
SOS
0.6β
rank 137 of 363
NCSOS
0.8β
WAB
-13.3β
rank 287 of 363
RR
-1.8β
Exp. W
9.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.103.7274111.4259108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%49.626052.021051.4
TO / 100 poss.17.121214.332816.7
Offensive rebound %27.228628.58230.6
FTA / FGA %34.619134.015235.0
Shooting
3P%33.917831.13633.9
2P%48.629755.732351.7
FT%74.89072.618972.5
Style
3PA / FGA %44.541.439.5
Assists / FGM %55.050.152.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %6.510.69.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %36.230.031.4
2-pointers %43.150.848.8
Free throws %20.719.219.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.6
Top Three Share of Minutes
45%
Bench Share of Minutes
32%
Players with Logged Minutes
17

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-08AkronL 69–10477.2Away0–1
11-11BucknellW 73–6368.4Home1–1
11-15KansasL 57–7670.9Away1–2
11-18IonaL 69–8977.4Away1–3
11-20NortheasternW 70–5767.1Home2–3
11-24BradleyL 64–8869.7Neutral2–4
11-25TempleL 75–7967.0Neutral2–5
11-26VermontL 74–7963.9Neutral2–6
11-30Saint Joseph'sL 58–6062.3Neutral2–7
12-03MonmouthL 58–6367.2Away2–8
12-06Loyola ChicagoL 68–7364.0Away2–9
12-10MerrimackL 56–5957.7Home2–10
12-22TempleL 61–6559.9Away2–11
12-30VermontW 75–69 1OT67.3Home3–11
01-05PennW 78–7666.5Home4–11
01-10YaleW 76–6065.0Home5–11
01-17HarvardL 80–87 1OT67.7Away5–12
01-19DartmouthL 69–7161.2Away5–13
01-24BrownW 63–5363.8Home6–13
01-30CornellL 64–8761.5Away6–14
01-31ColumbiaW 80–6862.0Away7–14
02-07PennL 60–6158.4Away7–15
02-13CornellL 65–8963.3Home7–16
02-14ColumbiaL 65–7556.3Home7–17
02-20BrownL 71–8064.1Away7–18
02-27HarvardL 56–5860.0Home7–19
02-28DartmouthW 82–6164.6Home8–19
03-07YaleL 53–7866.6Away8–20

Roster · 17 players

Player logs in 28 of 28 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groupsMinutesPer GameShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Jackson Hicke2834:2985.4%15.85.22.40.90.31.92.6105–20551.2%48–12239.3%87–10582.9%54.1%59.1%32.1%533:07 −1:2282.8%18.2 +2.4
Landon Clark2829:0972.2%6.24.01.90.90.31.22.222–4450.0%37–10236.3%19–2673.1%53.1%55.3%17.8%531:49 +2:4079.5%8.4 +2.2
Malik Abdullahi2628:4666.2%9.55.61.20.40.31.52.584–13661.8%2–219.5%†73–10271.6%55.4%61.2%65.0%531:31 +2:4678.8%9.8 +0.3
Jack Stanton2231:4861.9%11.13.61.70.90.11.02.017–3647.2%55–14737.4%45–4893.8%54.4%59.8%26.2%————
Jacob Huggins2821:2353.0%4.74.41.70.30.60.71.833–8638.4%6–1931.6%†48–8060.0%40.0%47.1%76.2%527:53 +6:3169.7%3.8 −0.9
Dalen Davis1928:5748.7%14.82.42.20.50.12.22.060–15538.7%29–7837.2%74–8389.2%44.4%52.1%35.6%532:47 +3:5081.9%15.0 +0.2
CJ Happy2418:3939.6%6.42.51.60.40.31.32.436–7746.8%24–7731.2%9–2437.5%†46.8%46.5%15.6%216:03 −2:3616.0%3.5 −2.9
Sebastian Whitfield2812:1230.2%3.21.90.50.40.10.81.023–5343.4%†11–4226.2%†10–1758.8%†41.6%†43.4%†17.9%†510:55 −1:1727.3%1.4 −1.8
Jacob Hammond226:4113.0%2.21.00.20.10.10.50.516–2759.3%†1–166.3%†13–1872.2%†40.7%†47.1%†41.9%†44:19 −2:228.6%1.3 −0.9
Peyton Seals178:1312.4%1.81.20.20.20.00.41.05–771.4%†6–2128.6%†3–3100.0%†50.0%†52.9%†10.7%†517:57 +9:4444.9%5.2 +3.4
Jake Sussberg186:119.8%1.90.80.10.10.10.10.83–650.0%†7–2133.3%†7–1070.0%†50.0%†54.1%†37.0%†34:03 −2:086.1%2.0 +0.1
Cash McSweeneyUnder 100 minutes134:535.6%0.61.00.60.20.00.70.72–540.0%†1–520.0%†1–425.0%†35.0%†34.0%†40.0%†22:29 −2:242.5%0.0 −0.6
Zio KimFew gamesUnder 100 minutes70:360.4%0.30.10.10.00.00.10.00–0—0–0—2–2100.0%†—113.6%†—10:44 +0:080.4%0.0 −0.3
Ryan MandesFew gamesUnder 100 minutes70:290.3%0.30.10.00.00.00.00.11–1100.0%†0–0—0–10.0%†100.0%†69.4%†100.0%†10:44 +0:150.4%0.0 −0.3
William KutzlerFew gamesUnder 100 minutes40:360.2%0.00.00.30.00.00.00.00–0—0–0—0–0————10:02 −0:340.0%0.0 0.0
Lucas DenaultFew gamesUnder 100 minutes10:140.0%0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00–0—0–0—0–0————————
Cooper MuellerFew gamesUnder 100 minutes10:110.0%3.00.00.00.00.00.00.00–0—1–1100.0%†0–0—150.0%†150.0%†0.0%†————
Team, games with logs · per game28 games67.532.612.5not published2.111.1not published407–83848.6%228–67233.9%391–52374.8%49.6%54.3%34.6%
Sum of players67.529.812.54.62.110.516.7Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+2.80.0not published+0.0+0.6not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$0 (assumed opted out)
80% Range $0 to $0 (assumed)
Tier
Low and other
low evidence

Assumed from one unverified press article that names schools that did not opt in. Methodology

No player figures. The Team Pool is $0.

1 rostered player has no figure: no recorded possessions or no matched player record.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

No modelled Team Pool (opted out). Enter a pool of your own.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Princeton University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$2,445,350Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$2,445,350
Athletics department expenses$50,386,480
Athletics department revenue$50,386,480

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 28 games, 1,821 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points67.572.4
Field goals made22.725.6
Field goals attempted53.956.3
3-pointers made8.17.3
3-pointers attempted24.023.3
Free throws made14.013.9
Free throws attempted18.719.1
Offensive rebounds9.19.4
Defensive rebounds23.524.4
Total rebounds32.633.8
Assists12.512.9
Blocks2.13.2
Turnovers11.19.3
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 130.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 467.
Minutes (derived)201.8not published

28 of 28 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled1,8891,8890±9.40
Field goals madeReconciled6356350±3.20
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,5101,5100±7.50
3-pointers madeReconciled2282280±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled6726720±3.40
Free throws madeReconciled3913910±2.00
Free throws attemptedReconciled5235230±2.60
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown914835+79±73.10
AssistsReconciled3493490±2.00
BlocksReconciled6059+1±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown311294+17±9.30
StealsNo team figurenot published130not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published467not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled5,6505,639+11.4±113.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Jackson Hicke85.0%+0.4range -0.4 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Landon Clark72.0%-0.1range -1.2 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Malik Abdullahi65.9%-1.1range -1.9 to -0.0Sufficient evidence
Jack Stanton62.4%+1.4range -0.0 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Jacob Huggins52.5%+0.8range -0.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Dalen Davis49.2%-1.3range -2.7 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
CJ Happy40.4%-1.6range -2.7 to -0.2Sufficient evidence
Sebastian Whitfield30.3%-1.9range -3.2 to -0.6Sufficient evidence
Jacob Hammond13.4%-2.4range -3.2 to -1.6Limited evidence
Peyton Seals12.3%+0.0range -0.9 to +0.9Limited evidence
Jake Sussberg9.9%-0.7range -1.9 to +0.3Limited evidence
Cash McSweeney5.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Zio Kim0.4%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Ryan Mandes0.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
William Kutzler0.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Lucas Denault0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Cooper Mueller0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+9.1range +8.2 to +10.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 98.7% of on-court time. 5 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 7.1%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value