Iona

MAAC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 162 · Raw net 1.0 · Tempo 68.4 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-05

Record: 18–14; 18 wins
AdjNet: -3.7β; rank 224 of 365
AdjO: 104.6β; rank 256 of 365
AdjD: 108.4β; rank 182 of 365
AdjT: 69.6β
SOS: -5.7β; rank 334 of 363
NCSOS: -1.6β
WAB: -9.0β; rank 208 of 363
RR: 0.1β
Exp. W: 17.9β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	105.8232	104.885	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	51.9150	48.963	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.2221	16.6178	16.7
Offensive rebound %	27.8274	31.2214	30.6
FTA / FGA %	29.3323	28.840	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.1105	30.624	33.9
2P%	51.2205	51.0141	51.7
FT%	70.7249	73.3241	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	45.9	40.7	39.5
Assists / FGM %	53.6	56.7	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	8.3	11.1	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	38.8	31.4	31.4
2-pointers %	44.5	50.9	48.8
Free throws %	16.6	17.7	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.0
Top Three Share of Minutes: 43%
Bench Share of Minutes: 34%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-07	Hofstra	W 81–73	74.7	Home	1–0
11-11	Kansas City	W 105–91	86.3	Away	2–0
11-14	Fordham	W 76–71	69.7	Home	3–0
11-18	Princeton	W 89–69	77.4	Home	4–0
11-21	Akron	L 75–96	77.2	Neutral	4–1
11-22	Oregon St.	W 91–84 2OT	85.3	Neutral	5–1
11-24	Green Bay	L 75–80	67.7	Neutral	5–2
12-01	Delaware	W 89–66	69.9	Away	6–2
12-05	Quinnipiac	L 68–89	73.1	Home	6–3
12-07	Sacred Heart	W 81–69	70.6	Away	7–3
12-10	Bryant	W 69–63	66.6	Home	8–3
12-13	St. John's (NY)	L 64–91	76.1	Away	8–4
12-20	Vermont	W 83–78	68.0	Away	9–4
12-29	Mount St. Mary's	L 59–66	74.4	Away	9–5
01-02	Siena	W 75–72	71.7	Home	10–5
01-04	Marist	L 38–83	70.6	Away	10–6
01-09	Niagara	W 71–53	60.7	Home	11–6
01-11	Canisius	W 74–48	61.3	Home	12–6
01-14	Rider	L 68–72	60.5	Away	12–7
01-19	Saint Peter's	L 63–77	68.3	Away	12–8
01-22	Merrimack	W 61–60	60.4	Home	13–8
01-24	Manhattan	W 66–57	64.9	Home	14–8
01-30	Fairfield	L 70–71	62.4	Home	14–9
02-05	Siena	L 72–79	66.1	Away	14–10
02-07	Mount St. Mary's	L 76–83	63.3	Home	14–11
02-13	Canisius	W 69–63	64.3	Away	15–11
02-15	Niagara	L 68–70	56.1	Away	15–12
02-20	Saint Peter's	W 72–64 1OT	75.9	Home	16–12
02-22	Merrimack	L 86–88 2OT	73.9	Away	16–13
02-27	Rider	W 80–58	71.7	Home	17–13
03-01	Manhattan	W 69–65	75.0	Away	18–13
03-05	Sacred Heart	L 80–91	68.5	Neutral	18–14

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
C.J. Anthony	31	31:42	75.3%	14.3	3.1	5.4	1.6	0.1	2.8	2.3	92–189	48.7%	52–140	37.1%	104–137	75.9%	51.7%	57.0%	41.6%	5	35:50 +4:07	83.3%	16.0 +1.7
Lamin Sabally	31	30:12	71.7%	11.4	8.2	3.2	1.6	0.5	1.9	2.0	137–230	59.6%	1–10	10.0%†	76–129	58.9%	57.7%	59.5%	53.8%	4	31:29 +1:17	58.6%	12.0 +0.6
Denver Anglin	31	28:06	66.8%	9.3	2.1	1.9	0.9	0.1	1.0	1.1	44–103	42.7%	56–188	29.8%	31–39	79.5%	44.0%	46.6%	13.4%	4	31:05 +2:59	57.8%	5.0 −4.3
Toby Harris	32	25:46	63.2%	11.2	3.4	0.7	0.4	0.3	1.0	1.8	30–55	54.5%	90–219	41.1%	28–31	90.3%	60.2%	62.2%	11.3%	5	28:01 +2:15	65.2%	8.6 −2.6
Kosy Akametu	29	24:23	54.2%	11.0	5.0	0.9	0.5	0.3	1.5	2.0	84–174	48.3%	28–93	30.1%	66–86	76.7%	47.2%	52.2%	32.2%	5	32:48 +8:25	76.3%	16.4 +5.4
Alliou Fall	31	18:58	45.1%	2.7	4.1	1.1	0.6	1.2	1.3	2.9	36–80	45.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	11–22	50.0%†	43.9%†	45.3%†	26.8%†	5	20:23 +1:25	47.4%	2.6 −0.1
Luke Jungers	30	16:23	37.7%	6.0	1.9	0.2	0.3	0.2	0.5	1.9	13–20	65.0%	43–98	43.9%	25–32	78.1%	65.7%	68.1%	27.1%	5	22:27 +6:04	52.2%	11.8 +5.8
Keshawn Williams	16	22:43	27.9%	8.5	3.2	1.1	0.4	0.0	1.1	0.7	41–81	50.6%	14–39	35.9%†	12–16	75.0%†	51.7%	53.5%	13.3%	—	—	—	—
Khalil Badru	31	10:02	23.9%	3.6	2.6	0.2	0.3	0.4	0.9	1.0	39–70	55.7%†	1–11	9.1%†	30–48	62.5%	50.0%†	54.3%†	59.3%†	5	9:45 −0:18	22.7%	5.4 +1.8
Chase Cormier	32	9:22	23.0%	2.0	0.7	0.3	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.8	3–10	30.0%†	18–54	33.3%	5–6	83.3%†	46.9%†	48.8%†	9.4%†	5	9:04 −0:18	21.1%	0.6 −1.4
Matt Reed	17	6:34	8.6%	1.6	1.3	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.2	1.1	7–13	53.8%†	3–14	21.4%†	5–10	50.0%†	42.6%†	44.6%†	37.0%†	3	8:24 +1:50	11.7%	4.0 +2.4
Oscar HourruitinerFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	1:12	0.5%	0.0	0.3	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.2	0–2	0.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	2:03 +0:51	1.0%	0.0 0.0
Connor HoranFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	6	1:06	0.5%	0.0	0.2	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.2	0–1	0.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	0–0	—	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	1	2:03 +0:57	1.0%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per game	32 games			73.8	35.6	13.9	not published	3.0	12.0	not published	526–1028	51.2%	306–871	35.1%	393–556	70.7%	51.9%	55.1%	29.3%
Sum of players				73.8	32.3	14.0	6.6	3.0	11.3	16.2	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.3	−0.0	not published	+0.1	+0.7	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $235K; 80% Range $81K to $625K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $210K to $305K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 2 floor only

The widest scenario range, $110K to $825K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
C.J. Anthony	75.9%	$50K	$16K to $155K	19.7%	$46K to $67K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Lamin Sabally	71.9%	$17K	$2K to $65K	10.2%	$16K to $23K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Denver Anglin	66.6%	$20K	$3K to $69K	11.0%	$18K to $27K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Toby Harris	63.2%	$21K	$3K to $73K	11.3%	$20K to $29K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kosy Akametu	54.1%	$17K	$3K to $60K	9.2%	$16K to $23K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Alliou Fall	45.9%	$31K	$9K to $115K	12.7%	$29K to $42K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Luke Jungers	37.2%	$16K	$3K to $56K	7.6%	$14K to $21K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Keshawn Williams	28.2%	$9K	$2K to $29K	4.8%	$8K to $12K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Khalil Badru	24.0%	$5K	$1K to $19K	2.9%	$5K to $7K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chase Cormier	23.0%	$7K	$2K to $25K	4.0%	$7K to $10K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Matt Reed	8.8%	$3K	$1K to $9K	1.2%	$2K to $4K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Oscar Hourruitiner	0.6%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Connor Horan	0.6%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$235K	$81K to $625K	100%	$210K to $305K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Iona University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$4,073,711	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$4,073,711
Athletics department expenses	$19,346,668
Athletics department revenue	$19,346,668

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 32 games, 2,232 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	73.8	73.1
Field goals made	26.0	26.3
Field goals attempted	59.3	61.5
3-pointers made	9.6	7.7
3-pointers attempted	27.2	25.0
Free throws made	12.3	13.0
Free throws attempted	17.4	17.7
Offensive rebounds	9.9	11.7
Defensive rebounds	25.7	25.8
Total rebounds	35.6	37.4
Assists	13.9	14.9
Blocks	3.0	3.6
Turnovers	12.0	11.6
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 212.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 519.
Minutes (derived)	203.9	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,363	2,363	0	±11.8	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	832	832	0	±4.2	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,899	1,899	0	±9.5	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	306	306	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	871	871	0	±4.4	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	393	393	0	±2.0	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	556	556	0	±2.8	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,139	1,033	+106	±91.1	0
Assists	Reconciled	446	447	−1	±2.2	0
Blocks	Reconciled	97	95	+2	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	384	362	+22	±11.5	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	212	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	519	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,525	6,502	+22.8	±130.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
C.J. Anthony	75.9%	+1.8range +0.8 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Lamin Sabally	71.9%	-0.4range -2.0 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Denver Anglin	66.6%	+0.1range -1.2 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Toby Harris	63.2%	+0.3range -0.8 to +1.7Sufficient evidence
Kosy Akametu	54.1%	+0.2range -1.0 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Alliou Fall	45.9%	+2.2range +0.5 to +3.4Sufficient evidence
Luke Jungers	37.2%	+0.8range -0.9 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Keshawn Williams	28.2%	+0.0range -0.9 to +0.7Sufficient evidence
Khalil Badru	24.0%	-1.1range -2.3 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Chase Cormier	23.0%	-0.1range -1.2 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Matt Reed	8.8%	-1.8range -2.7 to -1.0Limited evidence
Oscar Hourruitiner	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Connor Horan	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +9.9range +9.0 to +10.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.7% of on-court time. 2 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 0.3%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.8%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value