Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Clemson

ACC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 42 · Raw net 10.7 · Tempo 65.1 · 35 Division I games · Through 2026-03-20

All seasons
Record
24–11
24 wins
AdjNet
15.5β
rank 35 of 365
AdjO
114.5β
rank 66 of 365
AdjD
99.0β
rank 23 of 365
AdjT
65.4β
SOS
7.2β
rank 49 of 363
NCSOS
-0.7β
WAB
2.7β
rank 33 of 363
RR
1.4β
Exp. W
22.6β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.112.495101.741108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%52.612648.85851.4
TO / 100 poss.14.02417.412316.7
Offensive rebound %28.126326.32230.6
FTA / FGA %36.713633.915035.0
Shooting
3P%34.116632.48833.9
2P%53.610549.06451.7
FT%72.518974.830772.5
Style
3PA / FGA %43.143.239.5
Assists / FGM %50.346.052.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %9.210.39.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %33.534.231.4
2-pointers %46.345.248.8
Free throws %20.220.619.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
9.2
Top Three Share of Minutes
40%
Bench Share of Minutes
39%
Players with Logged Minutes
12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03New HampshireW 88–3869.4Home1–0
11-07Gardner-WebbW 97–5969.9Home2–0
11-11Morehead St.W 83–5659.9Home3–0
11-15GeorgetownL 74–7969.8Away3–1
11-17North Ala.W 81–6162.8Home4–1
11-21West VirginiaW 70–6766.0Neutral5–1
11-23GeorgiaW 97–94 1OT83.1Neutral6–1
11-28Alabama A&MW 92–5670.6Home7–1
12-03AlabamaL 84–9072.0Away7–2
12-09BYUL 64–6760.9Neutral7–3
12-13MercerW 70–6363.7Home8–3
12-16South CarolinaW 68–6166.3Home9–3
12-21CincinnatiW 68–6566.9Neutral10–3
12-31SyracuseW 64–6166.6Away11–3
01-03PittsburghW 73–6867.2Away12–3
01-07SMUW 74–7065.6Home13–3
01-10Notre DameW 76–6164.0Away14–3
01-13Boston CollegeW 74–5065.5Home15–3
01-17Miami (FL)W 69–5964.7Home16–3
01-20NC StateL 76–80 1OT71.6Home16–4
01-24Georgia TechW 77–6366.6Away17–4
01-31PittsburghW 63–5256.4Home18–4
02-04StanfordW 66–6461.9Away19–4
02-07CaliforniaW 77–5564.6Away20–4
02-11Virginia TechL 66–7664.9Home20–5
02-14DukeL 54–6761.9Away20–6
02-18Wake ForestL 77–8566.6Away20–7
02-21Florida St.L 65–7059.9Home20–8
02-28LouisvilleW 80–7569.9Home21–8
03-03North CarolinaL 63–6765.5Away21–9
03-07Georgia TechW 79–7666.2Home22–9
03-11Wake ForestW 71–6259.6Neutral23–9
03-12North CarolinaW 80–7969.0Neutral24–9
03-13DukeL 61–7363.2Neutral24–10
03-20IowaL 61–6753.7—24–11

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 35 of 35 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groupsMinutesSeason TotalsShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Dillon Hunter3528:3370.9%264130106344396855–11946.2%33–9534.7%55–7078.6%48.8%53.9%32.7%528:29 −0:0571.2%7.4 −0.1
Jestin Porter3527:0167.1%3376347438274147–11341.6%65–18734.8%48–6376.2%48.2%51.4%21.0%525:49 −1:1264.5%9.0 −0.6
RJ Godfrey3525:0762.4%4211875722214892160–25562.7%2–1020.0%†95–14466.0%61.5%64.1%54.3%524:07 −1:0060.3%13.0 +1.0
Nick Davidson3521:4554.0%319140381614367285–13961.2%29–8434.5%62–9267.4%57.6%60.5%41.3%524:39 +2:5461.6%10.2 +1.1
Efrem Johnson3521:0752.4%2217435226163725–5545.5%44–12435.5%39–4783.0%50.8%55.3%26.3%529:10 +8:0472.9%10.4 +4.1
Jake Wahlin3520:2650.7%184136231210256330–5950.8%34–10034.0%22–3268.8%50.9%53.2%20.1%518:18 −2:0945.7%1.8 −3.5
Ace Buckner3519:2848.3%29210163293366670–13850.7%29–9331.2%65–8081.3%49.1%54.8%34.6%525:24 +5:5563.5%9.0 +0.7
Carter Welling3220:4847.2%327174352724406790–15956.6%17–5829.3%96–13770.1%53.2%59.0%63.1%217:04 −3:4417.1%9.0 −1.2
Chase Thompson359:0122.4%79401074111918–2864.3%†10–2540.0%†13–1968.4%†62.3%†64.4%†35.8%†512:43 +3:4131.8%4.2 +1.9
Zac Foster1218:2415.7%83343053153213–3735.1%†13–4727.7%†18–2281.8%†38.7%†44.3%†26.2%†————
Dallas ThomasUnder 100 minutes224:256.9%499221474–1040.0%†12–2157.1%†5–862.5%†71.0%†71.0%†25.8%†45:26 +1:0110.9%2.3 0.0
Trent SteinourFew gamesUnder 100 minutes62:251.0%67000121–425.0%†0–0—4–666.7%†25.0%†45.2%†150.0%†————
Team, games with logs · season totals35 games25821193446not published99322not published598–111653.6%288–84434.1%522–72072.5%52.6%56.7%36.7%
Sum of players2582109544621998298566Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0+980not published+1+24not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$3.55M
80% Range $2.60M to $5.00M
Tier
Power 4
medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$3.55M in all four
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
12
1 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Dillon Hunter70.1%$525K$315K to $850K14.8%$525K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Jestin Porter66.5%$550K$350K to $865K15.1%$550K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
RJ Godfrey62.3%$790K$480K to $1.55M21.4%$790K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Nick Davidson53.4%$250K$61K to $425K7.4%$250K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Efrem Johnson52.9%$235K$60K to $400K7.1%$235K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jake Wahlin51.8%$280K$105K to $455K8.3%$280K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Ace Buckner47.8%$175K$32K to $330K5.1%$175K in all four$29KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Carter Welling47.4%$305K$150K to $485K8.8%$305K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Chase Thompson22.5%$140K$67K to $220K4.2%$140K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Zac Foster17.0%$115K$60K to $175K3.4%$115K in all four$29KSufficient evidence
Dallas Thomas7.1%$62K$37K to $95K1.8%$62K in all four$29KLimited evidence
Trent Steinour1.2%$29K$16K to $46K0.8%$29K in all four$29KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool—$3.55M$2.60M to $5.00M100%$3.55M in all four—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Clemson University (NCAA Division I-FBS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$12,592,738Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$12,592,738
Athletics department expenses$186,106,774
Athletics department revenue$186,106,774

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 35 games, 2,296 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points2,5822,336
Field goals made886794
Field goals attempted1,9601,898
3-pointers made288266
3-pointers attempted844820
Free throws made522482
Free throws attempted720644
Offensive rebounds326309
Defensive rebounds867834
Total rebounds1,1931,143
Assists446365
Blocks99115
Turnovers322400
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 219.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 566.
Minutes (derived)7,050not published

35 of 35 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,5822,5820±12.90
Field goals madeReconciled8868860±4.40
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,9601,9600±9.80
3-pointers madeReconciled2882880±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled8448440±4.20
Free throws madeReconciled5225220±2.60
Free throws attemptedReconciled7207200±3.60
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown1,1931,095+98±95.40
AssistsReconciled4464460±2.20
BlocksReconciled9998+1±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown322298+24±9.70
StealsNo team figurenot published219not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published566not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled7,0507,035+15.1±141.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Dillon Hunter70.1%+3.2range +1.7 to +4.4Sufficient evidence
Jestin Porter66.5%+3.7range +2.3 to +5.0Sufficient evidence
RJ Godfrey62.3%+5.8range +4.0 to +7.3Sufficient evidence
Nick Davidson53.4%+1.1range -0.2 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Efrem Johnson52.9%+0.9range -0.1 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Jake Wahlin51.8%+1.9range +0.3 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Ace Buckner47.8%+0.2range -1.3 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Carter Welling47.4%+2.4range +1.1 to +3.6Sufficient evidence
Chase Thompson22.5%+1.8range +0.7 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Zac Foster17.0%+1.8range +1.0 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Dallas Thomas7.1%+1.6range +0.8 to +2.5Limited evidence
Trent Steinour1.2%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+11.9range +11.1 to +12.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 99.8% of on-court time. 1 without a value (under 300 possessions) holds 0.2%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.4%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value