South Fla.

AAC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 23 · Raw net 13.8 · Tempo 73.0 · 33 Division I games · Through 2026-03-19

Record: 24–9; 24 wins
AdjNet: 14.5β; rank 40 of 365
AdjO: 116.5β; rank 51 of 365
AdjD: 102.0β; rank 46 of 365
AdjT: 71.9β
SOS: 2.7β; rank 97 of 363
NCSOS: 2.8β
WAB: 0.8β; rank 47 of 363
RR: -0.2β
Exp. W: 24.2β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	116.641	102.957	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	50.6209	48.857	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.173	19.142	16.7
Offensive rebound %	38.17	31.9252	30.6
FTA / FGA %	40.455	39.1288	35.0
Shooting
3P%	32.5256	34.5219	33.9
2P%	52.0167	46.926	51.7
FT%	74.6101	69.637	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	43.8	39.7	39.5
Assists / FGM %	58.4	51.6	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	11.0	13.1	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	32.5	32.9	31.4
2-pointers %	44.6	45.3	48.8
Free throws %	22.9	21.8	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 29%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Florida A&M	W 102–67	80.2	Home	1–0
11-08	George Washington	L 95–99	85.0	Neutral	1–1
11-12	Coppin St.	W 100–50	68.6	Home	2–1
11-16	Kennesaw St.	W 108–89	79.7	Away	3–1
11-19	Oklahoma St.	L 95–103	81.8	Away	3–2
11-26	VCU	L 66–78	72.3	Neutral	3–3
11-27	Western Ky.	W 97–91 1OT	91.3	Neutral	4–3
11-28	Colorado St.	L 68–83	68.7	Neutral	4–4
12-04	Utah St.	W 74–61	70.7	Home	5–4
12-10	Col. of Charleston	W 81–75	67.9	Home	6–4
12-17	Alabama	L 93–104	78.9	Away	6–5
12-21	UMBC	W 94–69	73.1	Home	7–5
01-04	UAB	L 106–109 2OT	96.8	Home	7–6
01-07	North Texas	W 74–70	68.3	Away	8–6
01-10	Tulsa	W 93–78	73.3	Away	9–6
01-14	East Carolina	W 82–71	74.1	Home	10–6
01-18	Wichita St.	L 85–86 1OT	76.7	Home	10–7
01-22	UAB	W 82–69	75.9	Away	11–7
01-25	Fla. Atlantic	W 89–75	70.9	Home	12–7
01-28	Tulane	W 97–83	75.5	Away	13–7
01-31	Temple	L 78–79	71.4	Away	13–8
02-04	UTSA	W 109–88	70.7	Home	14–8
02-08	Tulsa	W 80–74	68.4	Home	15–8
02-11	Wichita St.	W 66–58	69.4	Away	16–8
02-15	Fla. Atlantic	W 83–81 1OT	76.6	Away	17–8
02-19	Memphis	W 87–66	70.1	Home	18–8
02-25	Rice	W 75–56	69.6	Away	19–8
03-01	Tulane	W 90–62	72.8	Home	20–8
03-05	Memphis	W 96–89	77.5	Away	21–8
03-08	Charlotte	W 83–60	65.9	Home	22–8
03-14	Charlotte	W 86–64	68.7	Neutral	23–8
03-15	Wichita St.	W 70–55	68.2	Neutral	24–8
03-19	Louisville	L 79–83	75.2	—	24–9

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 33 of 33 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Wes Enis	32	33:47	80.4%	19.4	4.2	2.9	1.2	0.1	1.9	2.5	67–141	47.5%	107–304	35.2%	70–86	81.4%	51.1%	54.4%	19.3%	5	35:32 +1:45	88.8%	19.2 +2.8
Joseph Pinion	33	30:25	74.6%	19.6	5.2	3.1	2.2	0.3	2.0	3.6	58–135	43.0%	109–285	38.2%	48–61	78.7%	52.7%	54.9%	14.5%	5	30:19 −0:06	75.8%	15.6 +0.7
Izaiyah Nelson	33	27:33	67.6%	22.7	13.8	1.8	2.4	2.1	1.9	4.6	177–283	62.5%	6–46	13.0%†	143–197	72.6%	56.5%	61.9%	59.9%	5	25:45 −1:47	64.4%	13.8 −1.8
Josh Omojafo	33	27:23	67.2%	16.0	7.9	2.5	1.2	0.2	1.8	3.0	79–154	51.3%	22–71	31.0%	138–178	77.5%	49.8%	59.7%	79.1%	5	29:02 +1:40	72.6%	9.6 −1.4
CJ Brown	33	26:00	63.8%	16.2	5.7	7.1	1.5	0.4	3.1	4.8	96–232	41.4%	13–63	20.6%	117–162	72.2%	39.2%	47.5%	54.9%	5	23:08 −2:53	57.8%	6.6 −3.9
Isaiah Jones	33	15:38	38.3%	10.9	7.4	1.1	3.0	0.7	0.8	4.7	20–29	69.0%	24–79	30.4%	29–35	82.9%	51.9%	57.1%	32.4%	5	24:43 +9:06	61.8%	7.8 +3.5
Daimion Collins	32	13:47	32.8%	11.9	9.2	1.1	0.7	3.8	1.5	5.4	49–70	70.0%†	3–18	16.7%†	24–40	60.0%	60.8%†	62.0%†	45.5%†	5	10:26 −3:21	26.1%	3.2 −0.9
Adriel Nyorha	25	10:26	19.4%	14.1	6.1	7.1	1.8	0.6	4.6	3.1	23–55	41.8%†	9–28	32.1%†	19–28	67.9%	44.0%†	48.3%†	33.7%†	2	0:58 −9:28	1.0%	0.0 −3.7
Gavin Hightower	26	9:58	19.3%	16.4	6.6	6.9	3.1	0.0	4.8	5.7	37–67	55.2%†	1–5	20.0%†	29–43	67.4%	53.5%†	58.3%†	59.7%†	5	17:49 +7:51	44.6%	6.6 +2.5
Devin Haid	22	9:20	15.3%	12.1	8.4	3.3	2.1	0.4	1.4	3.7	12–27	44.4%†	8–30	26.7%†	14–15	93.3%†	42.1%†	48.7%†	26.3%†	3	2:01 −7:19	3.0%	0.0 −2.8
Tristan Beckford	20	6:34	9.8%	15.8	10.0	1.5	1.2	1.2	1.5	4.6	15–23	65.2%†	3–12	25.0%†	13–18	72.2%†	55.7%†	60.6%†	51.4%†	3	1:45 −4:49	2.6%	0.7 −1.9
Caleb SandersUnder 100 minutes	10	7:10	5.3%	16.7	6.1	2.8	1.7	0.0	2.2	3.3	5–7	71.4%†	3–7	42.9%†	11–14	78.6%†	67.9%†	74.4%†	100.0%†	—	—	—	—
Xavier BrownFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	3	12:18	2.7%	8.7	2.2	5.4	0.0	0.0	1.1	6.5	0–3	0.0%†	2–6	33.3%†	2–4	50.0%†	33.3%†	37.2%†	44.4%†	—	—	—	—
Onyx NnaniFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	0:31	0.0%	0.0	77.4	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	33 games			85.1	41.5	16.5	not published	4.0	11.0	not published	638–1226	52.0%	310–954	32.5%	657–881	74.6%	50.6%	55.8%	40.4%
Sum of players				85.1	36.6	16.5	8.9	4.0	10.6	19.4	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+5.0	0.0	not published	+0.0	+0.4	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $1.30M; 80% Range $565K to $2.95M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $1.00M to $1.45M; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Wes Enis	81.6%	$160K	$57K to $400K	13.7%	$125K to $180K	$9K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Joseph Pinion	76.4%	$245K	$100K to $590K	18.4%	$190K to $275K	$9K	Sufficient evidence
Izaiyah Nelson	69.5%	$295K	$120K to $740K	21.7%	$230K to $335K	$9K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Josh Omojafo	67.3%	$115K	$36K to $295K	10.1%	$91K to $130K	$9K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
CJ Brown	63.4%	$120K	$37K to $295K	10.2%	$92K to $135K	$9K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Jones	36.2%	$125K	$51K to $295K	9.2%	$97K to $140K	$9K	Sufficient evidence
Daimion Collins	31.8%	$49K	$13K to $130K	4.3%	$38K to $55K	$9K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Adriel Nyorha	19.5%	$26K	$8K to $72K	2.3%	$20K to $29K	$9K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Gavin Hightower	18.7%	$34K	$11K to $89K	3.0%	$27K to $39K	$9K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Devin Haid	15.4%	$28K	$10K to $73K	2.5%	$22K to $32K	$9K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tristan Beckford	10.8%	$19K	$7K to $50K	1.6%	$15K to $22K	$9K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Caleb Sanders	5.7%	$9K	$3K to $22K	0.7%	$7K to $10K	$9K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Xavier Brown	3.4%	$9K	$3K to $22K	0.7%	$7K to $10K	$9K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Onyx Nnani	0.1%	$9K	$3K to $22K	0.7%	$7K to $10K	$9K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$1.30M	$565K to $2.95M	100%	$1.00M to $1.45M	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of South Florida (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$8,567,400	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$8,567,400
Athletics department expenses	$122,093,386
Athletics department revenue	$122,093,386

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 33 games, 2,454 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1345 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	85.1	75.1
Field goals made	28.2	25.2
Field goals attempted	64.8	60.2
3-pointers made	9.2	8.2
3-pointers attempted	28.4	23.9
Free throws made	19.5	16.4
Free throws attempted	26.2	23.5
Offensive rebounds	15.3	12.3
Defensive rebounds	26.2	24.8
Total rebounds	41.5	37.1
Assists	16.5	13.0
Blocks	4.0	4.8
Turnovers	11.0	14.0
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 298.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 654.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

33 of 33 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,863	2,863	0	±14.3	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	948	948	0	±4.7	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,180	2,180	0	±10.9	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	310	310	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	954	954	0	±4.8	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	657	657	0	±3.3	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	881	881	0	±4.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,397	1,230	+167	±111.8	0
Assists	Reconciled	554	554	0	±2.8	0
Blocks	Reconciled	134	133	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	371	358	+13	±11.1	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	298	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	654	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,725	6,678	+47.1	±134.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Wes Enis	81.6%	+2.7range +1.6 to +3.9Sufficient evidence
Joseph Pinion	76.4%	+4.8range +3.4 to +5.9Sufficient evidence
Izaiyah Nelson	69.5%	+6.3range +4.8 to +7.5Sufficient evidence
Josh Omojafo	67.3%	+2.2range +0.9 to +3.4Sufficient evidence
CJ Brown	63.4%	+2.5range +0.8 to +3.8Sufficient evidence
Isaiah Jones	36.2%	+4.8range +3.7 to +6.1Sufficient evidence
Daimion Collins	31.8%	+1.4range -0.1 to +2.9Sufficient evidence
Adriel Nyorha	19.5%	+0.3range -0.6 to +1.3Sufficient evidence
Gavin Hightower	18.7%	+1.6range +0.4 to +2.8Sufficient evidence
Devin Haid	15.4%	+1.3range +0.4 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Tristan Beckford	10.8%	+0.6range -0.3 to +1.6Limited evidence
Caleb Sanders	5.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Xavier Brown	3.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Onyx Nnani	0.1%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +12.5range +11.7 to +13.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

11 valued players hold 98.2% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.8%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.2%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value