Wes Enis
South Fla. · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1081:02 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 33:47
- Points per game
- 16.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 2.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 16.4 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.4 | 4.2 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 2.5 |
| Season totals | 525 | 114 | 78 | 33 | 2 | 52 | 67 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 174–445 | 39.1% | 13.9 | 16.5 |
| 2P | 67–141 | 47.5% | 4.4 | 5.2 |
| 3P | 107–304 | 35.2% | 9.5 | 11.2 |
| FT | 70–86 | 81.4% | 2.7 | 3.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.1% | 54.4% | 68.3% | 19.3% | 1.50 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
South Florida · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $160K
- 80% range $57K to $400K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.7%
- team pool $1.30M, 80% range $565K to $2.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $125K to $180K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $9K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 81.6%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
South Florida: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | South Florida | $160Kspeculative | $57K to $400K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.7 | +1.6 to +3.9 | Sufficient evidence | +2.0 | +0.7 | +6.8range +6.0 to +7.7 | 3,494 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 35:32 | 33:47 | 19:12–48:58 | |
| Points | 19.2 | 16.4 | 3.0–36.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 48.1% | 48.4% | 13.3%–82.1% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | Louisville | L 79–83 | 31:49 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-15 | 0-11 | 0-0 | 13.3% |
| 2026-03-15 | Wichita St. | W 70–55 | 39:57 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-21 | 3-11 | 2-2 | 40.5% |
| 2026-03-14 | Charlotte | W 86–64 | 33:36 | 24 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-14 | 4-9 | 4-4 | 71.4% |
| 2026-03-08 | Charlotte | W 83–60 | 32:19 | 20 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-16 | 4-9 | 2-3 | 56.3% |
| 2026-03-05 | Memphis | W 96–89 | 40:00 | 29 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9-17 | 2-9 | 9-9 | 58.8% |
| 2026-03-01 | Tulane | W 90–62 | 35:33 | 25 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9-14 | 5-10 | 2-2 | 82.1% |
| 2026-02-25 | Rice | W 75–56 | 35:22 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-11 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 13.6% |
| 2026-02-19 | Memphis | W 87–66 | 36:07 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4-12 | 3-8 | 9-9 | 45.8% |
| 2026-02-15 | Fla. Atlantic | W 83–81 | 43:18 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10-17 | 5-9 | 2-3 | 73.5% |
| 2026-02-11 | Wichita St. | W 66–58 | 35:51 | 16 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 7-18 | 1-6 | 1-2 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-08 | Tulsa | W 80–74 | 35:04 | 20 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-11 | 2-6 | 6-8 | 63.6% |
| 2026-02-04 | UTSA | W 109–88 | 37:04 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-15 | 5-14 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Temple | L 78–79 | 36:13 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-12 | 3-8 | 4-4 | 54.2% |
| 2026-01-28 | Tulane | W 97–83 | 30:07 | 25 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-13 | 5-10 | 6-7 | 73.1% |
| 2026-01-25 | Fla. Atlantic | W 89–75 | 33:03 | 19 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-13 | 5-13 | 4-4 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-22 | UAB | W 82–69 | 24:27 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2-8 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-18 | Wichita St. | L 85–86 | 39:34 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-15 | 4-11 | 0-0 | 46.7% |
| 2026-01-14 | East Carolina | W 82–71 | 30:53 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-13 | 3-9 | 3-4 | 42.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | Tulsa | W 93–78 | 38:50 | 32 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 10-21 | 10-19 | 2-3 | 71.4% |
| 2026-01-07 | North Texas | W 74–70 | 27:52 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | UAB | L 106–109 | 48:58 | 36 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 13-28 | 10-22 | 0-0 | 64.3% |
| 2025-12-17 | Alabama | L 93–104 | 37:04 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-17 | 6-15 | 0-0 | 58.8% |
| 2025-12-10 | Col. of Charleston | W 81–75 | 32:07 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-04 | Utah St. | W 74–61 | 29:55 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-28 | Colorado St. | L 68–83 | 36:21 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-17 | 4-13 | 1-1 | 47.1% |
| 2025-11-27 | Western Ky. | W 97–91 | 29:15 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | VCU | L 66–78 | 19:12 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 31.3% |
| 2025-11-19 | Oklahoma St. | L 95–103 | 36:37 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7-19 | 4-13 | 2-2 | 47.4% |
| 2025-11-16 | Kennesaw St. | W 108–89 | 39:40 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-10 | 2-6 | 5-6 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | Coppin St. | W 100–50 | 19:17 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-12 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 45.8% |
| 2025-11-08 | George Washington | L 95–99 | 24:12 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1-6 | 0-5 | 1-2 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-03 | Florida A&M | W 102–67 | 31:25 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8-19 | 5-13 | 1-2 | 55.3% |