CJ Brown
South Fla. · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
858:10 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 26:00
- Points per game
- 10.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.7 / 4.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.5 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 3.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.2 | 5.7 | 7.1 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 3.1 | 4.8 |
| Season totals | 348 | 122 | 152 | 32 | 9 | 67 | 102 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 109–295 | 36.9% | 8.9 | 13.8 |
| 2P | 96–232 | 41.4% | 7.0 | 10.8 |
| 3P | 13–63 | 20.6% | 1.9 | 2.9 |
| FT | 117–162 | 72.2% | 4.9 | 7.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.2% | 47.5% | 21.4% | 54.9% | 2.27 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
South Florida · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $120K
- 80% range $37K to $295K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.2%
- team pool $1.30M, 80% range $565K to $2.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $92K to $135K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $9K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 63.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
South Florida: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | South Florida | $120Kspeculative | $37K to $295K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.5 | +0.8 to +3.8 | Sufficient evidence | +2.0 | +0.5 | +5.1range +4.3 to +5.7 | 2,714 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | South Florida | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.8 | +0.8 to +2.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | +1.1 | +3.0range +2.6 to +3.5 | 2,034 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 23:08 | 26:00 | 14:03–38:49 | |
| Points | 6.6 | 10.5 | 2.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 50.4% | 42.6% | 11.1%–86.4% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | Louisville | L 79–83 | 19:46 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-15 | Wichita St. | W 70–55 | 27:25 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 7-10 | 20.0% |
| 2026-03-14 | Charlotte | W 86–64 | 19:38 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-03-08 | Charlotte | W 83–60 | 28:47 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-11 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 31.8% |
| 2026-03-05 | Memphis | W 96–89 | 20:02 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 3-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-01 | Tulane | W 90–62 | 14:21 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-25 | Rice | W 75–56 | 15:42 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 16.7% |
| 2026-02-19 | Memphis | W 87–66 | 33:14 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3-11 | 0-1 | 7-8 | 27.3% |
| 2026-02-15 | Fla. Atlantic | W 83–81 | 34:55 | 17 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-13 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 42.3% |
| 2026-02-11 | Wichita St. | W 66–58 | 20:05 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | Tulsa | W 80–74 | 34:19 | 14 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-12 | 1-3 | 7-8 | 29.2% |
| 2026-02-04 | UTSA | W 109–88 | 14:03 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-7 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Temple | L 78–79 | 35:33 | 11 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 7-7 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-28 | Tulane | W 97–83 | 24:13 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-25 | Fla. Atlantic | W 89–75 | 33:00 | 17 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5-14 | 0-2 | 7-9 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-22 | UAB | W 82–69 | 33:01 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-18 | Wichita St. | L 85–86 | 38:49 | 16 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-13 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-14 | East Carolina | W 82–71 | 20:21 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-13 | 1-5 | 3-4 | 34.6% |
| 2026-01-10 | Tulsa | W 93–78 | 23:14 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | North Texas | W 74–70 | 24:57 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 6-8 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-04 | UAB | L 106–109 | 26:28 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3-12 | 0-3 | 2-4 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | UMBC | W 94–69 | 24:09 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-9 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 11.1% |
| 2025-12-17 | Alabama | L 93–104 | 29:03 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2-11 | 0-3 | 5-6 | 18.2% |
| 2025-12-10 | Col. of Charleston | W 81–75 | 29:57 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3-12 | 0-7 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-04 | Utah St. | W 74–61 | 29:37 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 1-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | Colorado St. | L 68–83 | 30:14 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-12 | 1-5 | 2-5 | 20.8% |
| 2025-11-27 | Western Ky. | W 97–91 | 38:18 | 18 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5-18 | 1-5 | 7-10 | 30.6% |
| 2025-11-26 | VCU | L 66–78 | 31:33 | 11 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-15 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 26.7% |
| 2025-11-19 | Oklahoma St. | L 95–103 | 17:09 | 24 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9-11 | 1-1 | 5-5 | 86.4% |
| 2025-11-16 | Kennesaw St. | W 108–89 | 26:14 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-10 | 0-2 | 4-7 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | Coppin St. | W 100–50 | 17:45 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | George Washington | L 95–99 | 22:02 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8-12 | 0-1 | 6-8 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-03 | Florida A&M | W 102–67 | 20:16 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 50.0% |