Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Col. of Charleston

CAA · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 143 · Raw net 2.1 · Tempo 68.3 · 31 Division I games · Through 2026-03-08

All seasons
Record
20–11
20 wins
AdjNet
0.6β
rank 162 of 365
AdjO
108.1β
rank 178 of 365
AdjD
107.5β
rank 158 of 365
AdjT
68.6β
SOS
-1.3β
rank 204 of 363
NCSOS
-1.5β
WAB
-4.4β
rank 94 of 363
RR
3.2β
Exp. W
16.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.109.4146107.3141108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%50.521249.27451.4
TO / 100 poss.15.712014.730816.7
Offensive rebound %29.920432.327430.6
FTA / FGA %41.24226.11535.0
Shooting
3P%30.633132.69133.9
2P%53.411249.58051.7
FT%73.614969.74472.5
Style
3PA / FGA %38.143.739.5
Assists / FGM %52.653.252.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %13.08.69.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %26.636.631.4
2-pointers %50.347.948.8
Free throws %23.115.619.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
9.5
Top Three Share of Minutes
41%
Bench Share of Minutes
39%
Players with Logged Minutes
16

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-07LibertyL 75–9062.6Away0–1
11-08Fla. AtlanticL 77–9467.4Neutral0–2
11-14South Carolina St.W 88–6167.3Home1–2
11-17DrakeL 62–7168.8Home1–3
11-21MassachusettsW 69–6568.0Neutral2–3
11-23YaleL 63–7465.0Neutral2–4
11-24EvansvilleW 78–5970.3Neutral3–4
11-30BelmontL 73–9670.6Home3–5
12-10South Fla.L 75–8167.9Away3–6
12-14CharlotteW 74–6768.1Home4–6
12-17The CitadelW 82–7872.1Home5–6
12-21Northern Ky.W 85–7473.7Away6–6
12-29DrexelW 72–6362.6Home7–6
12-31ElonW 85–8173.6Away8–6
01-05William & MaryW 88–7982.3Home9–6
01-10HamptonW 74–7063.0Home10–6
01-15TowsonL 52–6167.7Away10–7
01-17Stony BrookL 106–112 2OT86.4Away10–8
01-22CampbellW 87–8372.7Home11–8
01-24ElonW 80–7071.9Home12–8
01-29HofstraW 66–6468.4Away13–8
01-31NortheasternW 89–8468.9Away14–8
02-05N.C. A&TW 78–6271.1Home15–8
02-09UNCWL 64–7668.0Home15–9
02-12HofstraL 62–6670.2Home15–10
02-15CampbellW 62–5760.8Away16–10
02-19N.C. A&TW 74–6163.4Away17–10
02-21MonmouthW 74–6367.4Home18–10
02-26HamptonW 85–7168.4Away19–10
03-01UNCWW 79–7664.5Away20–10
03-08TowsonL 56–8160.4Neutral20–11

Roster · 16 players

Player logs in 31 of 31 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groupsMinutesPer 40 MinutesShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Jlynn Counter3031:0974.7%20.56.47.12.00.33.82.7122–23751.5%31–9134.1%141–17680.1%51.4%58.9%53.7%530:53 −0:1577.2%14.6 −1.3
Martin Kalu3126:5666.8%13.06.21.11.20.21.43.447–9649.0%37–12828.9%67–8677.9%45.8%51.9%38.4%523:16 −3:4058.2%7.0 −1.8
Connor Hickman2530:5962.0%13.94.31.91.30.11.82.555–10751.4%39–13828.3%43–5578.2%46.3%50.1%22.4%524:25 −6:3561.0%7.4 −3.4
Christian Reeves3021:1451.0%20.814.80.70.52.81.83.6133–20465.2%0–0—65–10760.7%65.2%65.9%52.5%527:36 +6:2269.0%13.6 +2.6
Chol Machot3119:3148.4%18.011.00.40.95.23.05.697–15363.4%6–2227.3%†60–8769.0%60.6%63.8%49.7%515:58 −3:3339.9%7.4 −1.4
Chris Davis Jr3018:0643.4%16.45.81.41.00.01.52.632–8239.0%40–9641.7%39–5570.9%51.7%55.1%30.9%526:05 +7:5965.2%12.0 +4.6
Colby Duggan1928:0642.7%13.33.43.30.20.22.22.135–6752.2%23–7829.5%38–4486.4%47.9%53.8%30.3%524:58 −3:0862.4%7.2 −2.1
Chadlyn Traylor3116:5942.1%9.02.54.80.80.31.13.825–5843.1%†17–4141.5%†18–3256.3%51.0%†52.6%†32.3%†516:42 −0:1741.7%2.6 −1.2
Jaxon Prunty3116:0039.7%9.74.82.31.00.01.33.420–4940.8%†12–4327.9%†44–5284.6%41.3%†52.2%†56.5%†58:17 −7:4320.7%1.8 −2.1
Bryce BakerFew games813:238.6%4.94.51.11.10.01.12.63–475.0%†2–1910.5%†1–250.0%†26.1%†27.2%†8.7%†————
Kendall TaylorFew gamesUnder 100 minutes99:226.7%3.37.12.80.50.02.45.23–1323.1%†0–120.0%†1–333.3%†12.0%†13.3%†12.0%†————
Mister DeanFew gamesUnder 100 minutes317:444.3%23.38.36.83.00.86.04.510–1758.8%†0–20.0%†11–1668.8%†52.6%†59.5%†84.2%†————
Will MortimoreFew gamesUnder 100 minutes77:194.1%14.111.70.02.30.81.69.45–955.6%†0–0—8–1172.7%†55.6%†65.0%†122.2%†————
Djordje CurcicFew gamesUnder 100 minutes85:343.6%2.71.83.63.60.01.82.70–20.0%†0–70.0%†3–650.0%†0.0%†12.9%†66.7%†12:35 −2:591.3%0.0 −0.4
AJ FowlerFew gamesUnder 100 minutes20:160.0%0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00–0—0–0—0–0————————
Joey ScarpittiFew gamesUnder 100 minutes30:110.0%0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00–10.0%†0–0—0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†————
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes31 games74.736.513.4not published4.610.8not published587–109953.4%207–67730.6%539–73273.6%50.5%55.6%41.2%
Sum of players74.733.113.45.64.610.516.6Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.40.0not published+0.0+0.3not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$275K
80% Range $99K to $735K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$250K to $365K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
16
6 floor only

The widest scenario range, $135K to $970K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Jlynn Counter75.2%$56K$19K to $170K19.5%$52K to $77K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Martin Kalu67.8%$12K$1K to $54K6.7%$12K to $17K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Connor Hickman62.7%$21K$3K to $71K9.8%$19K to $28K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Christian Reeves51.2%$40K$13K to $130K13.6%$36K to $53K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chol Machot48.6%$24K$6K to $74K9.6%$22K to $32K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Colby Duggan43.2%$17K$3K to $55K7.3%$15K to $22K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chris Davis Jr42.9%$22K$6K to $73K8.8%$20K to $30K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chadlyn Traylor41.5%$19K$5K to $61K8.0%$17K to $26K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaxon Prunty39.6%$20K$4K to $65K8.1%$18K to $27K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Bryce Baker8.7%$3K$1K to $10K1.3%$3K to $4K$2KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kendall Taylor6.8%$2K$1K to $5K0.6%$1K to $2K$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Mister Dean4.3%$2K$1K to $5K0.6%$1K to $2K$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Will Mortimore3.9%$2K$1K to $5K0.6%$1K to $2K$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Djordje Curcic3.7%$2K$1K to $5K0.6%$1K to $2K$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
AJ Fowler0.0%$2K$1K to $5K0.6%$1K to $2K$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Joey Scarpitti0.0%$2K$1K to $5K0.6%$1K to $2K$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$275K$99K to $735K100%$250K to $365K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, College of Charleston (NCAA Division I without football)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$5,415,376Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$5,415,376
Athletics department expenses$25,451,848
Athletics department revenue$25,451,848

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 31 games, 2,133 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1250 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points74.773.3
Field goals made25.426.5
Field goals attempted56.862.8
3-pointers made6.68.9
3-pointers attempted21.727.4
Free throws made17.211.4
Free throws attempted23.416.4
Offensive rebounds10.312.5
Defensive rebounds26.224.1
Total rebounds36.536.6
Assists13.414.1
Blocks4.63.0
Turnovers10.810.0
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 175.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 519.
Minutes (derived)200.0not published

31 of 31 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,3342,3340±11.70
Field goals madeReconciled7947940±4.00
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,7761,7760±8.90
3-pointers madeReconciled2072070±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled6776770±3.40
Free throws madeReconciled5395390±2.70
Free throws attemptedReconciled7327320±3.70
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown1,1401,034+106±91.20
AssistsReconciled4184180±2.10
BlocksReconciled144143+1±2.00
TurnoversReconciled336327+9±10.10
StealsNo team figurenot published175not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published519not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,2506,227+23.4±125.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Jlynn Counter75.2%+2.3range +1.1 to +3.7Sufficient evidence
Martin Kalu67.8%-0.7range -2.2 to +0.6Sufficient evidence
Connor Hickman62.7%+0.3range -0.9 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Christian Reeves51.2%+2.5range +1.1 to +3.6Sufficient evidence
Chol Machot48.6%+1.0range -0.2 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Colby Duggan43.2%+0.5range -0.9 to +1.8Sufficient evidence
Chris Davis Jr42.9%+1.2range -0.2 to +2.7Sufficient evidence
Chadlyn Traylor41.5%+0.9range -0.2 to +2.1Sufficient evidence
Jaxon Prunty39.6%+1.0range -0.4 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Bryce Baker8.7%-1.0range -1.9 to -0.1Limited evidence
Kendall Taylor6.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Mister Dean4.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Will Mortimore3.9%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Djordje Curcic3.7%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Joey Scarpitti0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
AJ Fowler0.0%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+10.1range +9.3 to +10.9Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 96.3% of on-court time. 6 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 3.7%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.7%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value