Martin Kalu
Col. of Charleston · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
834:53 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 26:56
- Points per game
- 8.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.2 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.8 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.0 | 6.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 3.4 |
| Season totals | 272 | 129 | 22 | 26 | 4 | 29 | 71 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 84–224 | 37.5% | 7.2 | 10.7 |
| 2P | 47–96 | 49.0%† | 3.1 | 4.6 |
| 3P | 37–128 | 28.9% | 4.1 | 6.1 |
| FT | 67–86 | 77.9% | 2.8 | 4.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.8% | 51.9% | 57.1% | 38.4% | 0.76 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Col Charleston · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $12K
- 80% range $1K to $54K
- Median share of team pool
- 6.7%
- team pool $275K, 80% range $99K to $735K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $12K to $17K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 67.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Col Charleston: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Col Charleston | $12Kspeculative | $1K to $54K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.7 | -2.2 to +0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | -0.6 | +4.3range +3.5 to +5.0 | 2,894 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 23:16 | 26:56 | 18:03–41:04 | |
| Points | 7.0 | 8.8 | 0.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 31.8% | 44.1% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Towson | L 56–81 | 19:34 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-01 | UNCW | W 79–76 | 21:51 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-11 | 0-5 | 3-4 | 18.2% |
| 2026-02-26 | Hampton | W 85–71 | 31:05 | 21 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-12 | 0-2 | 7-8 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | Monmouth | W 74–63 | 23:05 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-19 | N.C. A&T | W 74–61 | 20:45 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-15 | Campbell | W 62–57 | 25:34 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Hofstra | L 62–66 | 27:45 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0-7 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | UNCW | L 64–76 | 25:36 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | N.C. A&T | W 78–62 | 27:41 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-11 | 1-7 | 4-5 | 22.7% |
| 2026-01-31 | Northeastern | W 89–84 | 30:51 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | Hofstra | W 66–64 | 19:01 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Elon | W 80–70 | 28:06 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-5 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | Campbell | W 87–83 | 25:37 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Stony Brook | L 106–112 | 41:04 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-15 | Towson | L 52–61 | 27:25 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2-9 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | Hampton | W 74–70 | 26:06 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-05 | William & Mary | W 88–79 | 28:44 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5-9 | 4-6 | 3-4 | 77.8% |
| 2025-12-31 | Elon | W 85–81 | 24:50 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6-10 | 3-6 | 4-4 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Drexel | W 72–63 | 25:28 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-9 | 0-6 | 2-3 | 11.1% |
| 2025-12-21 | Northern Ky. | W 85–74 | 24:32 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2025-12-17 | The Citadel | W 82–78 | 29:17 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-10 | 4-9 | 3-4 | 70.0% |
| 2025-12-14 | Charlotte | W 74–67 | 34:36 | 18 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-8 | 4-6 | 2-4 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | South Fla. | L 75–81 | 31:58 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3-9 | 2-6 | 4-5 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-30 | Belmont | L 73–96 | 29:06 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-8 | 0-6 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Evansville | W 78–59 | 35:35 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5-13 | 5-10 | 6-8 | 57.7% |
| 2025-11-23 | Yale | L 63–74 | 18:03 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Massachusetts | W 69–65 | 28:05 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-17 | Drake | L 62–71 | 28:15 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-14 | South Carolina St. | W 88–61 | 21:57 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-4 | 6-7 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | Fla. Atlantic | L 77–94 | 24:14 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-10 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 45.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Liberty | L 75–90 | 29:07 | 22 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-11 | 4-7 | 4-6 | 81.8% |