Colby Duggan
Col. of Charleston · 2025–26 · 19 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
534:03 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 19
- Minutes per game
- 28:06
- Points per game
- 9.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 2.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.3 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.3 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| Season totals | 177 | 45 | 44 | 3 | 3 | 29 | 28 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 58–145 | 40.0% | 7.6 | 10.9 |
| 2P | 35–67 | 52.2%† | 3.5 | 5.0 |
| 3P | 23–78 | 29.5% | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| FT | 38–44 | 86.4% | 2.3 | 3.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.9% | 53.8% | 53.8% | 30.3% | 1.52 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Col Charleston · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $17K
- 80% range $3K to $55K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.3%
- team pool $275K, 80% range $99K to $735K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $15K to $22K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 43.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Col Charleston: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Col Charleston | $17Kspeculative | $3K to $55K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.5 | -0.9 to +1.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | +0.1 | +3.1range +2.6 to +3.6 | 1,842 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Campbell | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.4 | -0.6 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -0.1 | +3.7range +3.2 to +4.5 | 2,384 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Campbell | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.6 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -0.2 | +0.9range +0.7 to +1.1 | 819 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 24:58 | 28:06 | 17:47–39:42 | |
| Points | 7.2 | 9.3 | 0.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 51.6% | 44.2% | 0.0%–70.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Towson | L 56–81 | 27:12 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-01 | UNCW | W 79–76 | 27:39 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 56.3% |
| 2026-02-26 | Hampton | W 85–71 | 25:42 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Monmouth | W 74–63 | 21:20 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | N.C. A&T | W 74–61 | 22:59 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-15 | Campbell | W 62–57 | 20:47 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-12 | Hofstra | L 62–66 | 29:47 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-13 | 3-9 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | UNCW | L 64–76 | 17:47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | N.C. A&T | W 78–62 | 31:26 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4-9 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-31 | Northeastern | W 89–84 | 32:50 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-29 | Hofstra | W 66–64 | 32:33 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1-8 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 12.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Elon | W 80–70 | 33:02 | 17 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6-14 | 1-7 | 4-6 | 46.4% |
| 2026-01-22 | Campbell | W 87–83 | 30:36 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 6-6 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Stony Brook | L 106–112 | 39:42 | 13 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 7-7 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-15 | Towson | L 52–61 | 30:27 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Hampton | W 74–70 | 30:54 | 22 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7-13 | 4-7 | 4-4 | 69.2% |
| 2026-01-05 | William & Mary | W 88–79 | 28:33 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 6-12 | 2-7 | 3-3 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-31 | Elon | W 85–81 | 27:56 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 41.7% |
| 2025-12-29 | Drexel | W 72–63 | 22:51 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 62.5% |