Howie Fleming Jr.
UNLV · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
906:16 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 29:14
- Points per game
- 9.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.3 / 3.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.0 | 6.3 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 12.3 | 8.7 | 4.9 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 278 | 196 | 111 | 33 | 4 | 62 | 85 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 88–203 | 43.3% | 6.5 | 9.0 |
| 2P | 63–124 | 50.8% | 4.0 | 5.5 |
| 3P | 25–79 | 31.6% | 2.5 | 3.5 |
| FT | 77–96 | 80.2% | 3.1 | 4.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.5% | 56.7% | 38.9% | 47.3% | 1.79 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UNLV · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $170K
- 80% range $64K to $420K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.7%
- team pool $1.00M, 80% range $435K to $2.25M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $135K to $180K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $8K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 66.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UNLV: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UNLV | $170Kspeculative | $64K to $420K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.1 | +0.6 to +3.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | +0.5 | +5.3range +4.5 to +5.8 | 2,849 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:29 | 29:14 | 4:44–41:40 | |
| Points | 8.0 | 9.0 | 0.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.0% | 46.7% | 0.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-17 | UC Irvine | W 75–72 | 30:24 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 85.7% |
| 2026-03-12 | Utah St. | L 60–80 | 31:55 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1-6 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | Wyoming | W 73–70 | 24:29 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-06 | San Diego St. | L 86–89 | 38:29 | 6 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-03 | Utah St. | W 92–65 | 37:06 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-10 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 45.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Nevada | W 85–83 | 41:40 | 7 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 22.2% |
| 2026-02-25 | Grand Canyon | L 67–80 | 35:52 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-8 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 68.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | Air Force | W 91–66 | 32:12 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4-10 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Colorado St. | L 86–91 | 34:08 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-13 | Boise St. | W 86–83 | 22:27 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-10 | San Jose St. | W 82–75 | 4:44 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | Fresno St. | L 96–98 | 36:50 | 23 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 9-12 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 79.2% |
| 2026-01-30 | Nevada | L 76–89 | 22:42 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1-6 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 16.7% |
| 2026-01-27 | New Mexico | L 61–89 | 34:38 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | San Diego St. | L 71–82 | 32:47 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-20 | Utah St. | W 86–76 | 26:12 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | San Jose St. | W 76–62 | 36:56 | 21 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-11 | 3-6 | 6-6 | 68.2% |
| 2026-01-13 | Boise St. | W 89–85 | 34:18 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-13 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-09 | Colorado St. | L 62–70 | 21:03 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-06 | Wyoming | L 66–98 | 28:29 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 3-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Air Force | W 67–39 | 34:37 | 10 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 64.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | Fresno St. | W 84–72 | 27:49 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-8 | 2-7 | 5-6 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | Tennessee St. | L 60–63 | 19:25 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 4-6 | 125.0% |
| 2025-11-27 | Rutgers | L 65–80 | 15:22 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Alabama | L 76–115 | 30:23 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-25 | Maryland | L 67–74 | 37:39 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 3-6 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | Saint Joseph's | W 99–85 | 24:40 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-9 | 0-3 | 4-6 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-16 | Memphis | W 92–78 | 39:24 | 25 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9-16 | 1-5 | 6-7 | 59.4% |
| 2025-11-11 | Montana | L 93–102 | 10:06 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Chattanooga | W 101–69 | 30:25 | 13 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 6-6 | 116.7% |
| 2025-11-04 | UT Martin | L 81–86 | 29:05 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 50.0% |