Walter Brown
UNLV · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
668:48 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 20:16
- Points per game
- 3.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.8 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.8 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 7.6 | 5.6 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 4.2 |
| Season totals | 127 | 93 | 36 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 71 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 45–103 | 43.7% | 3.1 | 6.2 |
| 2P | 28–54 | 51.9%† | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| 3P | 17–49 | 34.7%† | 1.5 | 2.9 |
| FT | 20–35 | 57.1% | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.9% | 53.6% | 47.6% | 34.0% | 1.20 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UNLV · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $100K
- 80% range $30K to $280K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.3%
- team pool $1.00M, 80% range $435K to $2.25M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $80K to $110K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $8K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 49.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UNLV: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UNLV | $100Kspeculative | $30K to $280K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.2 | -0.1 to +2.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | +0.5 | +3.7range +3.2 to +4.2 | 2,134 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 33:56 | 20:16 | 2:02–42:30 | |
| Points | 6.6 | 3.8 | 0.0–11.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 60.6% | 52.4% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-22 | Tulsa | L 66–77 | 36:03 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-17 | UC Irvine | W 75–72 | 30:26 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-03-12 | Utah St. | L 60–80 | 37:26 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 83.3% |
| 2026-03-11 | Wyoming | W 73–70 | 33:47 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-7 | 2-5 | 1-5 | 57.1% |
| 2026-03-06 | San Diego St. | L 86–89 | 31:56 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Utah St. | W 92–65 | 29:43 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Nevada | W 85–83 | 42:30 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | Grand Canyon | L 67–80 | 19:59 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Air Force | W 91–66 | 29:33 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Colorado St. | L 86–91 | 18:25 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-13 | Boise St. | W 86–83 | 40:23 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-10 | San Jose St. | W 82–75 | 35:01 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Grand Canyon | W 80–78 | 23:52 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | Fresno St. | L 96–98 | 19:26 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 87.5% |
| 2026-01-30 | Nevada | L 76–89 | 17:56 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-27 | New Mexico | L 61–89 | 25:44 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | San Diego St. | L 71–82 | 7:45 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-20 | Utah St. | W 86–76 | 20:12 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 71.4% |
| 2026-01-13 | Boise St. | W 89–85 | 2:02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-09 | Colorado St. | L 62–70 | 5:31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-06 | Wyoming | L 66–98 | 11:19 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Air Force | W 67–39 | 7:24 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | — |
| 2025-12-20 | Fresno St. | W 84–72 | 2:40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-13 | Tennessee St. | L 60–63 | 12:01 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-07 | Stanford | W 75–74 | 21:12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-27 | Rutgers | L 65–80 | 19:37 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Alabama | L 76–115 | 12:17 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-25 | Maryland | L 67–74 | 10:33 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | — |
| 2025-11-20 | Saint Joseph's | W 99–85 | 22:50 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-16 | Memphis | W 92–78 | 12:36 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Montana | L 93–102 | 10:32 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-08 | Chattanooga | W 101–69 | 7:10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | UT Martin | L 81–86 | 10:57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |