Saint Louis

A-10 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 9 · Raw net 20.6 · Tempo 72.1 · 34 Division I games · Through 2026-03-21

Record: 28–6; 28 wins
AdjNet: 19.5β; rank 20 of 365
AdjO: 119.7β; rank 27 of 365
AdjD: 100.2β; rank 28 of 365
AdjT: 71.5β
SOS: 1.7β; rank 116 of 363
NCSOS: -5.5β
WAB: 3.3β; rank 30 of 363
RR: -0.2β
Exp. W: 28.2β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	119.913	99.221	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	59.72	45.23	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	17.2217	15.9224	16.7
Offensive rebound %	30.7173	27.243	30.6
FTA / FGA %	33.7221	37.1242	35.0
Shooting
3P%	39.92	30.314	33.9
2P%	59.511	45.17	51.7
FT%	74.1129	72.8204	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	45.1	41.9	39.5
Assists / FGM %	60.4	51.4	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.5	11.3	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	37.5	32.4	31.4
2-pointers %	45.3	44.6	48.8
Free throws %	17.3	23.0	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 9.2
Top Three Share of Minutes: 39%
Bench Share of Minutes: 38%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Southeast Mo. St.	W 92–67	77.2	Home	1–0
11-06	Chicago St.	W 108–86	85.7	Home	2–0
11-10	Lindenwood	W 109–66	81.0	Home	3–0
11-15	Grand Canyon	W 78–64	74.8	Home	4–0
11-21	Purdue Fort Wayne	W 91–60	70.4	Home	5–0
11-27	Santa Clara	W 71–70	70.7	Neutral	6–0
11-28	Stanford	L 77–78	72.3	Neutral	6–1
12-02	LMU (CA)	W 91–70	77.1	Away	7–1
12-07	Central Mich.	W 107–65	69.2	Home	8–1
12-13	San Francisco	W 85–75	70.4	Home	9–1
12-17	Bethune-Cookman	W 112–53	77.4	Home	10–1
12-21	New Hampshire	W 93–79	74.1	Home	11–1
12-31	Saint Joseph's	W 102–79	65.3	Home	12–1
01-07	VCU	W 71–62	77.0	Away	13–1
01-10	La Salle	W 84–72	67.5	Away	14–1
01-14	Fordham	W 78–56	60.9	Home	15–1
01-17	Richmond	W 88–63	69.4	Home	16–1
01-20	Duquesne	W 81–77	76.8	Away	17–1
01-23	St. Bonaventure	W 97–62	70.3	Away	18–1
01-27	George Washington	W 79–76	75.7	Home	19–1
01-30	Dayton	W 102–71	72.8	Home	20–1
02-03	Davidson	W 91–82	69.7	Away	21–1
02-07	La Salle	W 82–58	70.8	Home	22–1
02-13	Loyola Chicago	W 86–59	72.7	Away	23–1
02-17	Rhode Island	L 76–81	74.6	Away	23–2
02-20	VCU	W 88–75	77.1	Home	24–2
02-24	Dayton	L 62–77	69.4	Away	24–3
02-28	Duquesne	W 91–76	65.7	Home	25–3
03-04	Loyola Chicago	W 79–65	59.4	Home	26–3
03-07	George Mason	L 57–86	62.9	Away	26–4
03-13	George Washington	W 88–81	74.4	Neutral	27–4
03-14	Dayton	L 69–70	68.4	Neutral	27–5
03-19	Georgia	W 102–77	79.8	—	28–5
03-21	Michigan	L 72–95	70.5	—	28–6

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 34 of 34 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Quentin Jones	34	26:48	67.0%	307	129	100	31	29	64	91	71–143	49.7%	34–93	36.6%	63–79	79.7%	51.7%	56.7%	33.5%	5	26:14 −0:33	65.6%	4.8 −4.2
Robbie Avila	34	26:38	66.6%	434	152	142	22	18	60	62	75–124	60.5%	62–155	40.0%	98–122	80.3%	60.2%	65.2%	43.7%	5	26:35 −0:04	66.5%	11.8 −1.0
Dion Brown	34	23:51	59.6%	382	184	55	27	10	59	95	135–201	67.2%	23–59	39.0%	43–57	75.4%	65.2%	67.0%	21.9%	5	24:57 +1:06	62.4%	12.6 +1.4
Trey Green	33	23:51	57.9%	365	96	55	30	0	23	45	29–53	54.7%	92–203	45.3%	31–36	86.1%	65.2%	67.1%	14.1%	5	24:17 +0:26	60.7%	8.0 −3.1
Amari McCottry	34	22:49	57.0%	358	180	97	39	19	82	79	120–205	58.5%	18–62	29.0%	64–110	58.2%	55.1%	56.8%	41.2%	5	25:15 +2:26	63.1%	11.0 +0.5
Ishan Sharma	34	22:10	55.4%	312	91	47	22	2	18	48	17–31	54.8%	79–189	41.8%	41–47	87.2%	61.6%	64.8%	21.4%	5	23:34 +1:24	58.9%	8.6 −0.6
Brady Dunlap	33	16:53	41.0%	228	67	32	11	1	28	56	19–40	47.5%	48–108	44.4%	46–57	80.7%	61.5%	65.9%	38.5%	5	16:19 −0:34	40.8%	7.0 +0.1
Kellen Thames	32	17:09	40.4%	307	145	57	41	5	41	49	122–183	66.7%	3–12	25.0%†	54–86	62.8%	64.9%	65.9%	44.1%	5	15:42 −1:27	39.3%	9.0 −0.6
Paul Otieno	34	15:19	38.3%	177	130	30	12	26	22	67	59–103	57.3%	2–3	66.7%†	53–69	76.8%	58.5%	64.9%	65.1%	5	11:57 −3:22	29.9%	2.8 −2.4
Jax KerrUnder 100 minutes	17	5:09	6.4%	38	25	3	3	2	6	16	11–20	55.0%†	3–19	15.8%†	7–11	63.6%†	39.7%†	43.3%†	28.2%†	2	5:47 +0:38	5.8%	1.5 −0.7
Cam HutsonUnder 100 minutes	17	4:06	5.1%	21	11	3	1	2	10	15	4–8	50.0%†	2–12	16.7%†	7–10	70.0%†	35.0%†	43.0%†	50.0%†	2	4:49 +0:43	4.8%	3.5 +2.3
Jaden SchertzUnder 100 minutes	12	1:57	1.7%	4	3	1	1	0	1	1	2–5	40.0%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	40.0%†	40.0%†	0.0%†	1	1:00 −0:57	0.5%	0.0 −0.3
Isaac HolmesUnder 100 minutes	13	1:47	1.7%	6	4	1	1	0	0	4	1–1	100.0%†	1–4	25.0%†	1–2	50.0%†	50.0%†	51.0%†	40.0%†	1	1:00 −0:47	0.5%	0.0 −0.5
Team, games with logs · season totals	34 games			2939	1328	623	not published	114	421	not published	665–1117	59.5%	367–919	39.9%	508–686	74.1%	59.7%	62.9%	33.7%
Sum of players				2939	1217	623	241	114	414	628	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+111	0	not published	0	+7	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $725K; 80% Range $315K to $1.70M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $665K to $900K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

The widest scenario range, $405K to $2.05M, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Robbie Avila	67.5%	$180K	$70K to $460K	22.8%	$160K to $220K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Quentin Jones	67.2%	$100K	$40K to $255K	14.1%	$93K to $125K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dion Brown	60.4%	$53K	$15K to $150K	8.4%	$49K to $66K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Trey Green	58.6%	$67K	$24K to $165K	10.1%	$61K to $83K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Amari McCottry	57.9%	$50K	$15K to $135K	7.9%	$46K to $62K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ishan Sharma	54.9%	$76K	$30K to $185K	10.9%	$69K to $94K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Brady Dunlap	40.4%	$59K	$24K to $145K	8.3%	$54K to $73K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kellen Thames	39.5%	$52K	$18K to $130K	7.5%	$47K to $64K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Paul Otieno	38.0%	$35K	$11K to $94K	5.4%	$32K to $43K	$5K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jax Kerr	6.7%	$8K	$3K to $21K	1.2%	$7K to $10K	$5K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Cam Hutson	5.2%	$5K	$2K to $14K	0.8%	$5K to $7K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaac Holmes	1.8%	$5K	$2K to $14K	0.8%	$5K to $7K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaden Schertz	1.8%	$5K	$2K to $14K	0.8%	$5K to $7K	$5K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$725K	$315K to $1.70M	100%	$665K to $900K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Saint Louis University (NCAA Division I without football)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$7,230,593	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$7,230,593
Athletics department expenses	$29,626,637
Athletics department revenue	$29,626,637

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 34 games, 2,452 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	2,939	2,433
Field goals made	1,032	805
Field goals attempted	2,036	2,070
3-pointers made	367	263
3-pointers attempted	919	868
Free throws made	508	560
Free throws attempted	686	769
Offensive rebounds	334	372
Defensive rebounds	994	755
Total rebounds	1,328	1,127
Assists	623	414
Blocks	114	126
Turnovers	421	391
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 241.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 628.
Minutes (derived)	6,800	not published

34 of 34 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,939	2,939	0	±14.7	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	1,032	1,032	0	±5.2	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,036	2,036	0	±10.2	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	367	367	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	919	919	0	±4.6	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	508	508	0	±2.5	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	686	686	0	±3.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,328	1,217	+111	±106.2	0
Assists	Reconciled	623	623	0	±3.1	0
Blocks	Reconciled	114	114	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Reconciled	421	414	+7	±12.6	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	241	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	628	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,800	6,775	+25.4	±136.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Robbie Avila	67.5%	+7.4range +5.8 to +8.9Sufficient evidence
Quentin Jones	67.2%	+4.4range +2.9 to +5.9Sufficient evidence
Dion Brown	60.4%	+2.1range +0.4 to +3.9Sufficient evidence
Trey Green	58.6%	+3.1range +1.5 to +4.6Sufficient evidence
Amari McCottry	57.9%	+2.0range +0.5 to +3.2Sufficient evidence
Ishan Sharma	54.9%	+4.0range +2.4 to +5.3Sufficient evidence
Brady Dunlap	40.4%	+4.0range +2.8 to +5.4Sufficient evidence
Kellen Thames	39.5%	+3.4range +1.8 to +4.9Sufficient evidence
Paul Otieno	38.0%	+2.1range +0.6 to +3.5Sufficient evidence
Jax Kerr	6.7%	-0.1range -1.3 to +0.8Limited evidence
Cam Hutson	5.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Isaac Holmes	1.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jaden Schertz	1.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +13.0range +12.0 to +13.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.2% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.8%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.3%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value