Rhode Island

A-10 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 135 · Raw net 2.5 · Tempo 66.0 · 32 Division I games · Through 2026-03-12

Record: 16–16; 16 wins
AdjNet: 2.7β; rank 133 of 365
AdjO: 105.9β; rank 230 of 365
AdjD: 103.1β; rank 56 of 365
AdjT: 66.9β
SOS: 0.6β; rank 138 of 363
NCSOS: -3.8β
WAB: -7.8β; rank 175 of 363
RR: -1.1β
Exp. W: 17.1β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	105.0249	102.550	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	50.1232	50.4123	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	19.2329	21.19	16.7
Offensive rebound %	31.0162	31.8247	30.6
FTA / FGA %	38.490	42.6331	35.0
Shooting
3P%	31.1317	34.7231	33.9
2P%	52.8136	49.370	51.7
FT%	72.1206	70.471	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	43.5	41.5	39.5
Assists / FGM %	47.8	54.2	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	12.0	10.2	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	31.7	33.0	31.4
2-pointers %	46.7	44.1	48.8
Free throws %	21.6	22.9	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.5
Top Three Share of Minutes: 44%
Bench Share of Minutes: 32%
Players with Logged Minutes: 13

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Stetson	W 93–62	73.9	Home	1–0
11-07	Tulsa	L 65–82	65.2	Neutral	1–1
11-11	Stonehill	W 80–57	71.2	Home	2–1
11-14	UAlbany	W 80–61	66.0	Home	3–1
11-18	Yale	W 86–77	66.5	Away	4–1
11-24	Towson	L 55–62	61.3	Neutral	4–2
11-25	Vermont	W 80–65	64.0	Neutral	5–2
11-26	Temple	W 90–75	69.8	Neutral	6–2
12-02	Brown	W 66–56	65.8	Home	7–2
12-06	Providence	L 71–90	69.8	Away	7–3
12-09	McNeese	L 64–66	68.4	Home	7–4
12-16	Canisius	W 62–45	63.4	Home	8–4
12-22	Northeastern	W 85–77	64.7	Home	9–4
12-31	Loyola Chicago	L 57–61	65.4	Home	9–5
01-03	George Mason	L 50–61	62.3	Away	9–6
01-07	La Salle	L 72–79	64.1	Home	9–7
01-10	Davidson	W 70–45	60.4	Away	10–7
01-14	VCU	L 75–84	67.3	Home	10–8
01-21	Richmond	W 69–68	68.7	Away	11–8
01-24	George Mason	W 74–65	59.6	Home	12–8
01-27	Dayton	W 81–76 1OT	74.9	Away	13–8
02-01	Duquesne	L 61–76	65.5	Away	13–9
02-07	Richmond	W 82–77	68.0	Home	14–9
02-10	George Washington	L 70–75	67.8	Away	14–10
02-14	Fordham	L 66–70 1OT	69.1	Home	14–11
02-17	Saint Louis	W 81–76	74.6	Home	15–11
02-21	La Salle	L 46–59	61.6	Away	15–12
02-26	St. Bonaventure	L 76–94	69.8	Away	15–13
02-28	Saint Joseph's	L 55–61	70.3	Home	15–14
03-04	Duquesne	W 64–52	65.3	Home	16–14
03-07	Fordham	L 49–61	64.6	Away	16–15
03-12	Duquesne	L 61–67	59.6	Neutral	16–16

Roster · 13 players

Player logs in 32 of 32 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Tyler Cochran	32	30:48	76.4%	15.4	6.2	1.8	2.7	0.2	2.1	2.7	106–211	50.2%	55–164	33.5%	115–159	72.3%	50.3%	55.3%	42.4%	5	33:35 +2:47	84.0%	20.2 +4.8
Jonah Hinton	29	32:17	72.6%	12.6	3.0	2.1	0.7	0.1	2.0	1.8	39–81	48.1%	76–238	31.9%	59–72	81.9%	48.0%	52.0%	22.6%	5	34:18 +2:01	85.8%	6.2 −6.4
Keeyan Itejere	32	28:29	70.7%	7.6	5.7	0.5	0.9	1.4	1.4	3.3	92–142	64.8%	0–0	—	59–86	68.6%	64.8%	67.6%	60.6%	5	27:51 −0:38	69.6%	6.4 −1.2
Myles Corey	32	25:20	62.8%	9.3	3.1	1.7	1.3	0.5	1.5	1.6	89–140	63.6%	18–74	24.3%	66–90	73.3%	54.2%	58.8%	42.1%	5	22:14 −3:05	55.6%	4.2 −5.1
RJ Johnson	30	24:54	57.9%	5.7	1.7	3.7	0.7	0.1	1.5	1.5	42–96	43.8%	14–50	28.0%	45–49	91.8%	43.2%	51.0%	33.6%	4	30:26 +5:31	60.9%	8.3 +2.5
Jahmere Tripp	27	24:24	51.1%	12.0	4.3	1.5	1.3	0.4	1.9	3.1	71–146	48.6%	34–83	41.0%	81–110	73.6%	53.3%	58.6%	48.0%	5	25:27 +1:03	63.6%	10.2 −1.8
Alex Crawford	32	19:35	48.6%	5.0	3.3	0.2	0.7	0.6	1.1	2.3	42–88	47.7%	18–66	27.3%	21–43	48.8%	44.8%	46.0%	27.9%	5	18:32 −1:03	46.3%	5.2 +0.2
Jalen Harper	26	11:34	23.3%	2.6	1.8	0.3	0.1	0.2	0.5	1.3	9–27	33.3%†	10–35	28.6%†	19–28	67.9%	38.7%†	45.1%†	45.2%†	5	10:29 −1:05	26.2%	1.4 −1.2
Damone King	22	7:38	13.0%	2.3	0.5	0.2	0.3	0.1	0.3	0.4	12–20	60.0%†	7–27	25.9%†	6–7	85.7%†	47.9%†	50.9%†	14.9%†	—	—	—	—
Drissa Traore	22	7:29	12.8%	1.2	1.3	0.1	0.2	0.3	0.5	1.2	7–13	53.8%†	2–14	14.3%†	6–17	35.3%†	37.0%†	37.7%†	63.0%†	3	3:23 −4:05	5.1%	0.0 −1.2
Mouhamed SowFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	19:29	7.6%	6.4	5.6	0.2	0.6	0.6	0.6	2.0	12–21	57.1%†	1–5	20.0%†	5–8	62.5%†	51.9%†	54.2%†	30.8%†	—	—	—	—
Barrett LoerFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	5	3:53	1.5%	1.4	0.6	0.2	0.0	0.0	0.4	1.2	1–3	33.3%†	1–4	25.0%†	2–2	100.0%†	35.7%†	44.4%†	28.6%†	1	2:30 −1:23	1.3%	3.0 +1.6
Jimmy BallFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	1	0:16	0.0%	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	0–0	—	0–0	—	—	—	—	1	0:16 0:00	0.1%	0.0 0.0
Team, games with logs · per game	32 games			69.9	32.9	11.3	not published	3.7	12.8	not published	522–988	52.8%	236–760	31.1%	484–671	72.1%	50.1%	54.7%	38.4%
Sum of players				69.9	29.9	11.3	8.4	3.7	11.9	18.2	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+3.0	−0.0	not published	0.0	+0.8	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $835K; 80% Range $365K to $1.85M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $805K to $960K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 3 floor only

The widest scenario range, $420K to $2.05M, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Tyler Cochran	77.0%	$145K	$51K to $345K	17.1%	$135K to $165K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jonah Hinton	73.4%	$145K	$55K to $345K	16.7%	$135K to $165K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Keeyan Itejere	71.5%	$98K	$29K to $245K	13.1%	$94K to $110K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Myles Corey	63.6%	$150K	$57K to $375K	16.8%	$145K to $170K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
RJ Johnson	57.9%	$48K	$7K to $145K	7.5%	$46K to $55K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jahmere Tripp	51.0%	$115K	$41K to $290K	13.0%	$110K to $130K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Alex Crawford	48.1%	$26K	$4K to $97K	4.1%	$25K to $30K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jalen Harper	24.0%	$12K	$3K to $44K	1.4%	$12K to $14K	$6K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Drissa Traore	12.9%	$9K	$3K to $26K	1.1%	$9K to $10K	$6K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Damone King	12.2%	$10K	$3K to $28K	1.1%	$9K to $11K	$6K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mouhamed Sow	6.7%	$6K	$2K to $15K	0.8%	$6K to $7K	$6K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Barrett Loer	1.6%	$6K	$2K to $15K	0.8%	$6K to $7K	$6K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Jimmy Ball	0.0%	$6K	$2K to $15K	0.8%	$6K to $7K	$6K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$835K	$365K to $1.85M	100%	$805K to $960K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Rhode Island (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$7,857,206	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$7,857,206
Athletics department expenses	$41,724,734
Athletics department revenue	$41,765,283

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 32 games, 2,129 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	69.9	68.2
Field goals made	23.7	22.5
Field goals attempted	54.6	52.1
3-pointers made	7.4	7.5
3-pointers attempted	23.8	21.6
Free throws made	15.1	15.6
Free throws attempted	21.0	22.2
Offensive rebounds	10.6	10.4
Defensive rebounds	22.3	23.5
Total rebounds	32.9	33.9
Assists	11.3	12.2
Blocks	3.7	3.2
Turnovers	12.8	14.0
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 269.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 582.
Minutes (derived)	201.6	not published

32 of 32 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,236	2,236	0	±11.2	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	758	758	0	±3.8	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	1,748	1,748	0	±8.7	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	236	236	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	760	760	0	±3.8	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	484	484	0	±2.4	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	671	671	0	±3.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,053	957	+96	±84.2	0
Assists	Reconciled	362	363	−1	±2.0	0
Blocks	Reconciled	117	117	0	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	409	382	+27	±12.3	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	269	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	582	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	6,450	6,427	+22.7	±129.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Tyler Cochran	77.0%	+2.1range +0.6 to +3.6Sufficient evidence
Jonah Hinton	73.4%	+2.3range +0.9 to +3.7Sufficient evidence
Keeyan Itejere	71.5%	+1.2range +0.1 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Myles Corey	63.6%	+2.9range +1.6 to +4.0Sufficient evidence
RJ Johnson	57.9%	-0.2range -1.5 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Jahmere Tripp	51.0%	+2.5range +0.9 to +4.2Sufficient evidence
Alex Crawford	48.1%	-1.0range -2.3 to +0.1Sufficient evidence
Jalen Harper	24.0%	-2.1range -3.3 to -1.1Sufficient evidence
Drissa Traore	12.9%	-3.3range -4.3 to -2.3Limited evidence
Damone King	12.2%	-2.4range -3.3 to -1.4Limited evidence
Mouhamed Sow	6.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Barrett Loer	1.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jimmy Ball	0.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.4range +9.4 to +11.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.3% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.7%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 5.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value