New Mexico

MWC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 32 · Raw net 13.0 · Tempo 70.7 · 36 Division I games · Through 2026-04-02

Record: 25–11; 25 wins
AdjNet: 13.9β; rank 44 of 365
AdjO: 114.9β; rank 59 of 365
AdjD: 101.0β; rank 36 of 365
AdjT: 70.5β
SOS: 2.8β; rank 96 of 363
NCSOS: -0.4β
WAB: -0.3β; rank 53 of 363
RR: -0.8β
Exp. W: 25.8β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	114.369	101.336	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	53.585	49.584	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	14.958	19.051	16.7
Offensive rebound %	30.6176	27.757	30.6
FTA / FGA %	35.8161	33.3138	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.682	30.520	33.9
2P%	53.6104	53.1243	51.7
FT%	72.9177	73.5249	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	41.9	48.2	39.5
Assists / FGM %	52.7	55.0	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	9.2	9.2	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	33.6	35.6	31.4
2-pointers %	46.8	44.5	48.8
Free throws %	19.6	19.8	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.4
Top Three Share of Minutes: 43%
Bench Share of Minutes: 32%
Players with Logged Minutes: 12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-05	East Texas A&M	W 76–54	77.1	Home	1–0
11-08	UT Arlington	W 74–56	72.1	Home	2–0
11-11	UC Riverside	W 82–68	66.6	Home	3–0
11-15	New Mexico St.	L 68–76	65.7	Away	3–1
11-20	Nebraska	L 72–84	81.0	Neutral	3–2
11-21	Mississippi St.	W 80–78	72.5	Neutral	4–2
11-26	Alabama St.	W 93–87	72.8	Home	5–2
12-06	Santa Clara	W 98–71	71.6	Home	6–2
12-10	VCU	W 81–78	69.9	Away	7–2
12-14	FGCU	W 75–59	68.2	Home	8–2
12-20	San Jose St.	W 88–65	68.2	Home	9–2
12-30	Boise St.	L 53–62	70.2	Away	9–3
01-03	Wyoming	W 78–58	60.9	Home	10–3
01-06	Colorado St.	W 80–70	65.6	Away	11–3
01-10	Air Force	W 91–49	68.8	Away	12–3
01-13	Grand Canyon	W 87–64	73.2	Home	13–3
01-17	San Diego St.	L 79–83	78.1	Away	13–4
01-21	Fresno St.	W 83–74	78.7	Home	14–4
01-24	Nevada	W 80–73	70.4	Home	15–4
01-27	UNLV	W 89–61	74.8	Away	16–4
01-31	San Jose St.	W 90–80	63.8	Away	17–4
02-04	Utah St.	L 66–86	72.8	Home	17–5
02-07	Boise St.	L 90–91	67.4	Home	17–6
02-11	Grand Canyon	W 70–64	68.5	Away	18–6
02-17	Air Force	W 98–61	70.7	Home	19–6
02-21	Fresno St.	W 80–78	67.2	Away	20–6
02-24	Nevada	L 60–67	70.7	Away	20–7
02-28	San Diego St.	W 81–76	70.3	Home	21–7
03-04	Colorado St.	L 74–82	72.6	Home	21–8
03-07	Utah St.	L 90–94	69.2	Away	21–9
03-12	San Jose St.	W 93–77	68.8	Neutral	22–9
03-14	San Diego St.	L 62–64	66.1	Neutral	22–10
03-18	Sam Houston	W 107–83	76.0	—	23–10
03-22	George Washington	W 86–61	68.4	—	24–10
03-24	Saint Joseph's	W 84–69	73.8	—	25–10
04-02	Tulsa	L 69–74	71.0	—	25–11

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 36 of 36 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groups	Minutes			Per 40 Minutes							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Jake Hall	36	31:30	78.8%	20.6	4.1	2.1	1.1	0.0	1.4	2.2	84–154	54.5%	112–259	43.2%	80–101	79.2%	61.0%	63.8%	24.5%	5	34:49 +3:18	87.0%	16.0 −0.2
Luke Haupt	36	28:17	70.7%	11.4	6.4	4.2	2.1	0.3	2.0	3.9	81–161	50.3%	18–54	33.3%	73–102	71.6%	50.2%	55.6%	47.4%	5	32:13 +3:57	80.5%	7.8 −0.2
Uriah Tenette	35	27:37	67.1%	15.3	4.0	4.2	2.0	0.1	1.4	4.1	77–163	47.2%	42–129	32.6%	90–109	82.6%	47.9%	54.4%	37.3%	5	32:48 +5:12	82.0%	12.2 +1.6
Tomislav Buljan	35	25:59	63.2%	20.1	15.8	2.2	1.7	0.8	2.8	3.1	166–296	56.1%	8–26	30.8%†	102–168	60.7%	55.3%	57.8%	52.2%	5	25:27 −0:32	63.6%	16.0 +2.9
Antonio Chol	36	24:26	61.1%	12.4	4.8	1.3	0.5	1.0	1.0	2.7	42–78	53.8%	57–180	31.7%	17–28	60.7%	49.4%	50.3%	10.9%	5	19:00 −5:27	47.5%	4.2 −3.4
Deyton Albury	34	24:54	58.8%	19.1	6.0	4.6	2.3	0.2	3.6	4.1	114–207	55.1%	19–50	38.0%	119–152	78.3%	55.4%	62.4%	59.1%	4	26:16 +1:22	52.5%	13.3 +1.4
Tajavis Miller	31	16:32	35.6%	13.1	4.8	2.3	1.9	0.4	1.3	4.1	26–52	50.0%	33–98	33.7%	17–25	68.0%	50.3%	52.2%	16.7%	5	15:43 −0:49	39.3%	4.8 −0.6
JT Rock	36	12:30	31.3%	19.6	10.6	1.2	0.5	2.8	1.8	4.4	59–95	62.1%	23–57	40.4%	34–53	64.2%	61.5%	63.0%	34.9%	5	13:39 +1:09	34.1%	9.0 +2.9
Chris Howell	10	25:16	17.5%	9.5	4.8	5.5	2.7	0.3	3.0	3.3	12–27	44.4%†	5–15	33.3%†	21–24	87.5%†	46.4%†	57.1%†	57.1%†	—	—	—	—
Milos VicenticUnder 100 minutes	15	6:14	6.5%	18.4	5.1	0.9	2.1	0.0	0.9	3.9	10–17	58.8%†	5–24	20.8%†	8–8	100.0%†	42.7%†	48.3%†	19.5%†	1	3:11 −3:03	1.6%	0.0 −2.9
Kevin Patton Jr.Few gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	8:29	4.7%	8.8	8.2	1.8	1.2	0.0	1.8	2.4	6–12	50.0%†	0–7	0.0%†	3–6	50.0%†	31.6%†	34.7%†	31.6%†	—	—	—	—
Timeo PonsUnder 100 minutes	12	4:16	3.6%	18.0	9.4	0.8	1.6	1.6	2.3	4.7	3–7	42.9%†	4–16	25.0%†	5–5	100.0%†	39.1%†	45.6%†	21.7%†	3	6:26 +2:10	9.6%	1.7 −0.3
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes	36 games			80.8	36.5	14.7	not published	2.8	10.5	not published	680–1269	53.6%	326–915	35.6%	569–781	72.9%	53.5%	57.5%	35.8%
Sum of players				80.8	33.8	14.8	7.9	2.7	9.8	17.2	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+2.7	−0.0	not published	+0.0	+0.8	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $895K; 80% Range $405K to $2.05M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $805K to $950K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 12; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Jake Hall	78.2%	$175K	$73K to $425K	18.6%	$155K to $185K	$7K	Sufficient evidence
Luke Haupt	69.0%	$115K	$42K to $290K	13.5%	$105K to $120K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Uriah Tenette	65.8%	$175K	$73K to $440K	18.6%	$160K to $185K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tomislav Buljan	65.0%	$93K	$32K to $225K	11.2%	$84K to $99K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Antonio Chol	62.2%	$65K	$16K to $175K	8.5%	$59K to $69K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Deyton Albury	59.3%	$76K	$22K to $200K	9.5%	$69K to $81K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tajavis Miller	35.1%	$37K	$11K to $99K	4.8%	$34K to $40K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
JT Rock	30.4%	$68K	$28K to $165K	7.4%	$61K to $72K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chris Howell	20.2%	$33K	$12K to $79K	4.0%	$29K to $35K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Milos Vicentic	5.8%	$7K	$3K to $18K	0.8%	$7K to $8K	$7K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Kevin Patton Jr.	5.3%	$7K	$3K to $18K	0.8%	$7K to $8K	$7K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Timeo Pons	3.6%	$7K	$3K to $18K	0.8%	$7K to $8K	$7K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$895K	$405K to $2.05M	100%	$805K to $950K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of New Mexico-Main Campus (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$6,393,397
Men's basketball expenses	$5,830,673
Athletics department expenses	$56,544,018
Athletics department revenue	$61,160,745

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 36 games, 2,544 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1440 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	80.8	71.6
Field goals made	27.9	24.4
Field goals attempted	60.7	57.9
3-pointers made	9.1	8.5
3-pointers attempted	25.4	27.9
Free throws made	15.8	14.2
Free throws attempted	21.7	19.3
Offensive rebounds	10.8	9.9
Defensive rebounds	25.7	24.5
Total rebounds	36.5	34.4
Assists	14.7	13.4
Blocks	2.8	3.3
Turnovers	10.5	13.4
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 285.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 619.
Minutes (derived)	200.0	not published

36 of 36 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,907	2,907	0	±14.5	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	1,006	1,006	0	±5.0	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,184	2,184	0	±10.9	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	326	326	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	915	915	0	±4.6	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	569	569	0	±2.8	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	781	781	0	±3.9	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Reconciled	1,315	1,218	+97	±105.2	0
Assists	Reconciled	530	531	−1	±2.6	0
Blocks	Reconciled	99	98	+1	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	379	351	+28	±11.4	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	285	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	619	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	7,200	7,182	+17.9	±144.0	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Jake Hall	78.2%	+4.0range +2.6 to +5.3Sufficient evidence
Luke Haupt	69.0%	+2.7range +1.2 to +4.2Sufficient evidence
Uriah Tenette	65.8%	+4.8range +3.5 to +6.0Sufficient evidence
Tomislav Buljan	65.0%	+2.2range +1.0 to +3.7Sufficient evidence
Antonio Chol	62.2%	+1.3range -0.2 to +2.6Sufficient evidence
Deyton Albury	59.3%	+1.9range +0.2 to +3.3Sufficient evidence
Tajavis Miller	35.1%	+0.9range -0.0 to +2.0Sufficient evidence
JT Rock	30.4%	+3.8range +2.6 to +4.9Sufficient evidence
Chris Howell	20.2%	+2.0range +0.9 to +3.0Sufficient evidence
Milos Vicentic	5.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Kevin Patton Jr.	5.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Timeo Pons	3.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +11.9range +10.9 to +12.8Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

9 valued players hold 97.1% of on-court time. 3 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.9%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value