New Mexico

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for New Mexico, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
Jake Hall	78.2%	+4.0range +2.6 to +5.3Sufficient evidence	+7.8range +6.8 to +8.7Sufficient evidence	$175KspeculativeLoading	$73K to $425KLoading
Luke Haupt	69.0%	+2.7range +1.2 to +4.2Sufficient evidence	+6.2range +5.2 to +7.1Sufficient evidence	$115KspeculativeLoading	$42K to $290KLoading
Uriah Tenette	65.8%	+4.8range +3.5 to +6.0Sufficient evidence	+6.9range +6.2 to +7.6Sufficient evidence	$175KspeculativeLoading	$73K to $440KLoading
Tomislav Buljan	65.0%	+2.2range +1.0 to +3.7Sufficient evidence	+5.5range +4.8 to +6.3Sufficient evidence	$93KspeculativeLoading	$32K to $225KLoading
Antonio Chol	62.2%	+1.3range -0.2 to +2.6Sufficient evidence	+4.9range +4.0 to +5.6Sufficient evidence	$65KspeculativeLoading	$16K to $175KLoading
Deyton Albury	59.3%	+1.9range +0.2 to +3.3Sufficient evidence	+4.9range +4.1 to +5.6Sufficient evidence	$76KspeculativeLoading	$22K to $200KLoading
Tajavis Miller	35.1%	+0.9range -0.0 to +2.0Sufficient evidence	+2.6range +2.2 to +2.9Sufficient evidence	$37KspeculativeLoading	$11K to $99KLoading
JT Rock	30.4%	+3.8range +2.6 to +4.9Sufficient evidence	+2.9range +2.5 to +3.2Sufficient evidence	$68KspeculativeLoading	$28K to $165KLoading
Chris Howell	20.2%	+2.0range +0.9 to +3.0Sufficient evidence	+1.6range +1.4 to +1.8Sufficient evidence	$33KspeculativeLoading	$12K to $79KLoading
Milos Vicentic	5.8%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$7Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$3K to $18KLoading
Kevin Patton Jr.	5.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$7Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$3K to $18KLoading
Timeo Pons	3.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$7Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$3K to $18KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $895K; 80% Range $405K to $2.05M
Tier: Mid and high major; low to medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $805K to $950K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 12; 3 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Jake Hall	78.2%	$175K	$73K to $425K	18.6%	$155K to $185K	$7K	Sufficient evidence
Luke Haupt	69.0%	$115K	$42K to $290K	13.5%	$105K to $120K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Uriah Tenette	65.8%	$175K	$73K to $440K	18.6%	$160K to $185K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tomislav Buljan	65.0%	$93K	$32K to $225K	11.2%	$84K to $99K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Antonio Chol	62.2%	$65K	$16K to $175K	8.5%	$59K to $69K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Deyton Albury	59.3%	$76K	$22K to $200K	9.5%	$69K to $81K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tajavis Miller	35.1%	$37K	$11K to $99K	4.8%	$34K to $40K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
JT Rock	30.4%	$68K	$28K to $165K	7.4%	$61K to $72K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chris Howell	20.2%	$33K	$12K to $79K	4.0%	$29K to $35K	$7K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Milos Vicentic	5.8%	$7K	$3K to $18K	0.8%	$7K to $8K	$7K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Kevin Patton Jr.	5.3%	$7K	$3K to $18K	0.8%	$7K to $8K	$7K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Timeo Pons	3.6%	$7K	$3K to $18K	0.8%	$7K to $8K	$7K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$895K	$405K to $2.05M	100%	$805K to $950K	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of New Mexico-Main Campus (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$6,393,397
Men's basketball expenses	$5,830,673
Athletics department expenses	$56,544,018
Athletics department revenue	$61,160,745

Coverage and exclusions

32 of 36 games passed lineup acceptance (89%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

4 of 36 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expenses

Reported revenue	$6,393,397	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$5,830,673	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
1 day	2
2 days	1
3 or more days	32

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.4
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	0
Longest run of consecutive away games	2

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology