LIU

NEC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 128 · Raw net 2.8 · Tempo 68.2 · 35 Division I games · Through 2026-03-20

Record: 24–11; 24 wins
AdjNet: -1.7β; rank 199 of 365
AdjO: 106.1β; rank 227 of 365
AdjD: 107.7β; rank 163 of 365
AdjT: 68.7β
SOS: -5.1β; rank 324 of 363
NCSOS: 3.2β
WAB: -4.9β; rank 105 of 363
RR: 2.6β
Exp. W: 21.4β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	107.6195	104.882	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	52.8113	50.0102	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	18.9318	18.858	16.7
Offensive rebound %	33.970	33.0300	30.6
FTA / FGA %	34.0206	34.7168	35.0
Shooting
3P%	35.866	32.274	33.9
2P%	52.4151	50.9134	51.7
FT%	66.7346	68.816	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	29.3	32.9	39.5
Assists / FGM %	50.2	49.2	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	14.1	8.7	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	24.6	25.6	31.4
2-pointers %	57.7	55.1	48.8
Free throws %	17.7	19.3	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 7.8
Top Three Share of Minutes: 49%
Bench Share of Minutes: 25%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Notre Dame	L 67–89	71.0	Away	0–1
11-06	IU Indy	W 94–90	86.5	Away	1–1
11-11	Air Force	W 76–72	69.3	Away	2–1
11-15	James Madison	W 88–79	75.9	Home	3–1
11-20	Fordham	L 53–69	66.3	Away	3–2
11-22	Illinois	L 58–98	71.2	Away	3–3
11-24	Missouri St.	W 75–61	62.7	Away	4–3
12-02	Winthrop	L 92–94 1OT	76.3	Home	4–4
12-06	Lehigh	W 87–82	73.2	Away	5–4
12-13	La Salle	W 70–60	66.1	Home	6–4
12-16	Mississippi St.	L 83–87	71.7	Away	6–5
12-20	FIU	L 79–86	76.2	Away	6–6
12-29	Georgia	L 74–89	75.1	Away	6–7
01-02	Central Conn. St.	W 84–78	58.5	Home	7–7
01-04	Chicago St.	W 74–55	64.7	Away	8–7
01-08	Mercyhurst	W 60–58	60.2	Home	9–7
01-10	Saint Francis	W 67–63	71.3	Home	10–7
01-17	FDU	W 66–59	64.5	Away	11–7
01-19	Le Moyne	L 77–83	71.2	Away	11–8
01-23	Stonehill	W 66–63	64.9	Away	12–8
01-29	Le Moyne	W 83–61	75.6	Home	13–8
01-31	Central Conn. St.	W 80–59	66.2	Away	14–8
02-05	New Haven	W 60–55	63.1	Home	15–8
02-07	Stonehill	W 61–54	61.2	Home	16–8
02-12	Wagner	W 67–57	70.2	Away	17–8
02-14	New Haven	L 52–55	61.8	Away	17–9
02-16	Wagner	W 83–65	63.8	Home	18–9
02-19	Saint Francis	W 91–89	77.0	Away	19–9
02-21	Mercyhurst	L 83–91	69.7	Away	19–10
02-26	Chicago St.	W 73–56	65.3	Home	20–10
02-28	FDU	W 74–60	62.9	Home	21–10
03-04	Chicago St.	W 79–75	61.4	Home	22–10
03-07	Wagner	W 64–56	63.9	Home	23–10
03-10	Mercyhurst	W 79–70	66.2	Home	24–10
03-20	Arizona	L 58–92	70.7	—	24–11

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 35 of 35 team games

Team roster, per game
Column groups	Minutes			Per Game							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Greg Gordon	35	33:58	84.6%	14.0	5.5	2.9	1.7	0.7	1.9	1.8	213–359	59.3%	6–29	20.7%†	46–113	40.7%	57.2%	56.0%	29.1%	5	34:33 +0:35	86.4%	15.6 +1.6
Jamal Fuller	34	33:24	80.8%	16.2	5.5	2.6	1.0	1.1	2.1	2.8	129–227	56.8%	55–128	43.0%	128–166	77.1%	59.6%	64.4%	46.8%	5	34:25 +1:01	86.1%	14.0 −2.2
Malachi Davis	35	30:57	77.1%	14.0	3.5	3.4	1.2	0.1	2.8	2.1	141–309	45.6%	44–140	31.4%	77–124	62.1%	46.1%	48.8%	27.6%	5	26:58 −3:59	67.4%	9.2 −4.8
Jomo Goings	35	30:43	76.5%	9.8	4.5	2.2	1.3	0.7	2.2	2.9	76–181	42.0%	37–102	36.3%	80–95	84.2%	46.5%	52.8%	33.6%	5	30:12 −0:31	75.5%	7.4 −2.4
Shadrak Lasu	33	23:05	54.2%	5.2	5.4	0.4	0.3	1.4	0.8	2.8	57–103	55.3%	9–21	42.9%†	30–47	63.8%	56.9%	59.1%	37.9%	5	25:48 +2:43	64.5%	7.6 +2.4
Mason Porter-Brown	35	19:56	49.7%	7.8	3.2	0.6	0.8	0.4	1.0	2.2	51–95	53.7%	38–94	40.4%	57–80	71.3%	57.1%	60.9%	42.3%	5	26:38 +6:42	66.6%	12.2 +4.4
Faheim Meran	18	14:28	18.5%	3.1	1.1	1.1	0.8	0.4	0.9	0.8	8–18	44.4%†	11–30	36.7%†	7–12	58.3%†	51.0%†	52.6%†	25.0%†	—	—	—	—
Caleb Johnson	23	10:56	17.9%	2.5	2.1	0.5	0.7	0.3	0.3	1.4	23–33	69.7%†	0–11	0.0%†	12–16	75.0%†	52.3%†	56.8%†	36.4%†	5	9:25 −1:31	23.6%	2.2 −0.3
Tre'shawn Sheppard	26	9:31	17.6%	2.1	2.7	0.3	0.4	0.4	0.4	1.2	21–38	55.3%†	2–6	33.3%†	7–13	53.8%†	54.5%†	55.3%†	29.5%†	1	2:10 −7:21	1.1%	0.0 −2.1
A.J. Neal	15	7:39	8.2%	1.9	0.4	0.7	0.3	0.1	0.6	0.8	6–15	40.0%†	4–8	50.0%†	4–6	66.7%†	52.2%†	54.6%†	26.1%†	2	6:18 −1:21	6.3%	3.0 +1.1
Isaiah Miranda	13	8:05	7.5%	3.7	1.5	0.2	0.2	0.8	0.6	1.1	17–34	50.0%†	2–13	15.4%†	8–12	66.7%†	42.6%†	45.9%†	25.5%†	2	6:01 −2:05	6.0%	1.0 −2.7
Max Ndlovu-FraserFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	7	7:41	3.8%	0.7	0.6	0.6	0.4	0.0	0.6	0.6	1–4	25.0%†	1–3	33.3%†	0–0	—	35.7%†	35.7%†	0.0%†	2	8:12 +0:31	8.2%	0.0 −0.7
Xinyi LiFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	8	3:23	1.9%	0.6	0.8	0.0	0.0	0.1	0.5	0.6	1–4	25.0%†	1–3	33.3%†	0–0	—	35.7%†	35.7%†	0.0%†	4	2:49 −0:34	5.6%	0.5 −0.1
Eddie MunyakFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	2	1:21	0.2%	1.5	0.5	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0–0	—	1–1	100.0%†	0–0	—	150.0%†	150.0%†	0.0%†	1	0:48 −0:33	0.4%	3.0 +1.5
Team, games with logs · per game	35 games			73.6	34.9	13.7	not published	5.5	12.9	not published	744–1420	52.4%	211–589	35.8%	456–684	66.7%	52.8%	55.8%	34.0%
Sum of players				73.6	32.0	13.7	7.8	5.4	12.5	17.7	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0.0	+2.9	0.0	not published	+0.1	+0.5	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $315K; 80% Range $115K to $880K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $285K to $330K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 4 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Greg Gordon	84.2%	$36K	$9K to $110K	14.0%	$33K to $38K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jamal Fuller	84.2%	$90K	$29K to $285K	25.8%	$81K to $94K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Malachi Davis	77.2%	$34K	$7K to $105K	12.9%	$31K to $35K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jomo Goings	75.5%	$30K	$6K to $95K	12.0%	$27K to $32K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Shadrak Lasu	56.6%	$22K	$4K to $74K	8.9%	$20K to $23K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mason Porter-Brown	47.0%	$30K	$9K to $94K	10.0%	$27K to $32K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Faheim Meran	19.0%	$11K	$3K to $37K	4.0%	$10K to $12K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Tre'shawn Sheppard	18.9%	$11K	$3K to $33K	3.9%	$10K to $11K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Caleb Johnson	16.9%	$12K	$4K to $37K	4.0%	$11K to $13K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
A.J. Neal	8.1%	$4K	$1K to $11K	1.3%	$3K to $4K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaiah Miranda	6.6%	$2K	$1K to $7K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Max Ndlovu-Fraser	3.4%	$2K	$1K to $7K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Xinyi Li	2.0%	$2K	$1K to $7K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Eddie Munyak	0.2%	$2K	$1K to $7K	0.7%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$315K	$115K to $880K	100%	$285K to $330K	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Long Island University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$3,545,194	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$3,545,194
Athletics department expenses	$45,931,608
Athletics department revenue	$45,931,608

Team Totalsβ

Season per game, 35 games, 2,396 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	73.6	71.7
Field goals made	27.3	25.9
Field goals attempted	57.4	57.8
3-pointers made	6.0	6.1
3-pointers attempted	16.8	19.0
Free throws made	13.0	13.8
Free throws attempted	19.5	20.1
Offensive rebounds	11.4	11.6
Defensive rebounds	23.5	22.2
Total rebounds	34.9	33.7
Assists	13.7	12.7
Blocks	5.5	3.5
Turnovers	12.9	12.9
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 272.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 621.
Minutes (derived)	200.7	not published

35 of 35 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
Statistic	Status	Team Total, Logged Games	Sum of Players	Residual	Tolerance	Team Total, Games Without Logs
Points	Reconciled	2,577	2,577	0	±12.9	0
Field goals made	Reconciled	955	955	0	±4.8	0
Field goals attempted	Reconciled	2,009	2,009	0	±10.0	0
3-pointers made	Reconciled	211	211	0	±2.0	0
3-pointers attempted	Reconciled	589	589	0	±2.9	0
Free throws made	Reconciled	456	456	0	±2.3	0
Free throws attempted	Reconciled	684	684	0	±3.4	0
Offensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Defensive rebounds	No player split	not published	not published	not published	not published	not published
Total rebounds	Residual shown	1,221	1,121	+100	±97.7	0
Assists	Reconciled	479	479	0	±2.4	0
Blocks	Residual shown	191	188	+3	±2.0	0
Turnovers	Residual shown	453	436	+17	±13.6	0
Steals	No team figure	not published	272	not published	not published	not published
Personal fouls	No team figure	not published	621	not published	not published	not published
Minutes (derived)	Reconciled	7,025	7,005	+19.6	±140.5	0

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Greg Gordon	84.2%	+0.6range -0.5 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
Jamal Fuller	84.2%	+2.8range +1.8 to +3.9Sufficient evidence
Malachi Davis	77.2%	+0.5range -0.5 to +1.6Sufficient evidence
Jomo Goings	75.5%	+0.4range -0.5 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Shadrak Lasu	56.6%	+0.2range -0.9 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Mason Porter-Brown	47.0%	+1.2range +0.2 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Faheim Meran	19.0%	+0.8range -0.1 to +1.9Sufficient evidence
Tre'shawn Sheppard	18.9%	+0.7range -0.1 to +1.5Sufficient evidence
Caleb Johnson	16.9%	+1.3range +0.5 to +2.2Sufficient evidence
A.J. Neal	8.1%	-1.1range -1.7 to -0.4Limited evidence
Isaiah Miranda	6.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Max Ndlovu-Fraser	3.4%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Xinyi Li	2.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Eddie Munyak	0.2%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +10.2range +9.3 to +11.0Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 97.5% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 2.5%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 1.6%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value

LIU