Iona

2026 · descriptive season · nil-value-v3 · Team results

Roster valuesβ

Roster values for Iona, 2026: retrospective net points per 100 possessions and, for 2025–26 only, a speculative compensation best guess. Players are listed by possession share, not by value or dollars.
Player	Possession share	Net and range	Wins above replacement and range	Speculative compensation (best guess)	Compensation 80% range
C.J. Anthony	75.9%	+1.8range +0.8 to +2.9Sufficient evidence	+6.1range +5.5 to +6.8Sufficient evidence	$50KspeculativeLoading	$16K to $155KLoading
Lamin Sabally	71.9%	-0.4range -2.0 to +1.2Sufficient evidence	+4.7range +3.9 to +5.5Sufficient evidence	$17KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $65KLoading
Denver Anglin	66.6%	+0.1range -1.2 to +1.5Sufficient evidence	+4.6range +3.8 to +5.3Sufficient evidence	$20KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $69KLoading
Toby Harris	63.2%	+0.3range -0.8 to +1.7Sufficient evidence	+4.4range +3.8 to +5.2Sufficient evidence	$21KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $73KLoading
Kosy Akametu	54.1%	+0.2range -1.0 to +1.3Sufficient evidence	+3.8range +3.2 to +4.3Sufficient evidence	$17KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $60KLoading
Alliou Fall	45.9%	+2.2range +0.5 to +3.4Sufficient evidence	+3.9range +3.3 to +4.3Sufficient evidence	$31KspeculativeLoading	$9K to $115KLoading
Luke Jungers	37.2%	+0.8range -0.9 to +2.6Sufficient evidence	+2.8range +2.3 to +3.2Sufficient evidence	$16KspeculativeLoading	$3K to $56KLoading
Keshawn Williams	28.2%	+0.0range -0.9 to +0.7Sufficient evidence	+1.9range +1.7 to +2.1Sufficient evidence	$9KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $29KLoading
Khalil Badru	24.0%	-1.1range -2.3 to +0.1Sufficient evidence	+1.4range +1.2 to +1.7Sufficient evidence	$5KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $19KLoading
Chase Cormier	23.0%	-0.1range -1.2 to +0.9Sufficient evidence	+1.6range +1.3 to +1.8Sufficient evidence	$7KspeculativeLoading	$2K to $25KLoading
Matt Reed	8.8%	-1.8range -2.7 to -1.0Limited evidence	+0.5range +0.4 to +0.6Limited evidence	$3KspeculativeLoading	$1K to $9KLoading
Oscar Hourruitiner	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $5KLoading
Connor Horan	0.6%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence	Not applicable	$2Kspeculative, floor onlyLoading	$1K to $5KLoading

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals. Compensation is a speculative best guess of a share of the school's own revenue-sharing budget, not observed pay.

Team pool and per-player compensation · 2025–26β

Team Pool: $235K; 80% Range $81K to $625K
Tier: Low and other; low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $210K to $305K; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 13; 2 floor only

The widest scenario range, $110K to $825K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
C.J. Anthony	75.9%	$50K	$16K to $155K	19.7%	$46K to $67K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Lamin Sabally	71.9%	$17K	$2K to $65K	10.2%	$16K to $23K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Denver Anglin	66.6%	$20K	$3K to $69K	11.0%	$18K to $27K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Toby Harris	63.2%	$21K	$3K to $73K	11.3%	$20K to $29K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kosy Akametu	54.1%	$17K	$3K to $60K	9.2%	$16K to $23K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Alliou Fall	45.9%	$31K	$9K to $115K	12.7%	$29K to $42K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Luke Jungers	37.2%	$16K	$3K to $56K	7.6%	$14K to $21K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Keshawn Williams	28.2%	$9K	$2K to $29K	4.8%	$8K to $12K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Khalil Badru	24.0%	$5K	$1K to $19K	2.9%	$5K to $7K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chase Cormier	23.0%	$7K	$2K to $25K	4.0%	$7K to $10K	$2K	Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Matt Reed	8.8%	$3K	$1K to $9K	1.2%	$2K to $4K	$2K	Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Oscar Hourruitiner	0.6%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Connor Horan	0.6%	$2K	$1K to $5K	0.8%	$2K in all four	$2K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool	—	$235K	$81K to $625K	100%	$210K to $305K	—

What-if calculator on the team page

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Iona University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$4,073,711	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$4,073,711
Athletics department expenses	$19,346,668
Athletics department revenue	$19,346,668

Coverage and exclusions

31 of 32 games passed lineup acceptance (97%). 100% of accepted on-court possessions are bound to registered players.

1 of 32 audited games did not pass lineup acceptance; per-game reasons are counted for the whole season (see methodology), not per team

Program revenueβ

EADA year 2024-25 (alternate pairing to repo season 2026; fiscal-year mapping unconfirmed) · self-reported by the school, no external review · EADA revenue is any money used to pay expensesrevenue equals expenses

Reported revenue	$4,073,711	Reported by the school; not NIL pay and not a model output.
Reported expenses	$4,073,711	Reported by the school.

EADA link: matched to the registry school by a unique institution name and state.

No model-implied dollar range is shown (status: suppressed). The published dollar status could not be loaded; see NIL methodology for the reason.

Schedule loadβ

Counts are descriptive and associational, with neutral formatting. Consecutive away games is the only travel proxy; distance, time zones and injuries are not modeled.

Rest days before each game

Rest days	Games
First game (no rest value)	1
1 day	1
2 days	9
3 or more days	21

Rest is capped at three days. Descriptive count.

Load summary

Mean games in prior 7 days	1.5
Games with fewer rest days than the opponent	2
Longest run of consecutive away games	3

Association between rest and margin, all teams

Pooled association passes the declared test (gate S1); not causal and not specific to this team · 0.86 points of margin associated with each extra rest day, range +0.33 to +1.41

This is an association, not a causal lever, pooled across Division I and not specific to this team.

Manifest 13921361a27d · NIL methodology