South Alabama
SB · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 126 · Raw net 2.9 · Tempo 65.7 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-17
Scouting Report
| Category | Offense | Defense | D-I Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency | |||
| Efficiency / 100 poss. | 109.0161 | 106.1108 | 108.5 |
| Four Factors | |||
| Effective FG% | 52.7115 | 50.1106 | 51.4 |
| TO / 100 poss. | 13.18 | 18.093 | 16.7 |
| Offensive rebound % | 25.2338 | 30.9201 | 30.6 |
| FTA / FGA % | 37.2121 | 25.69 | 35.0 |
| Shooting | |||
| 3P% | 34.4148 | 33.4146 | 33.9 |
| 2P% | 53.4114 | 50.2104 | 51.7 |
| FT% | 64.5362 | 73.2231 | 72.5 |
| Style | |||
| 3PA / FGA % | 36.7 | 64.9 | 39.5 |
| Assists / FGM % | 45.7 | 71.2 | 52.6 |
| Blocks / opp. 2PA % | 10.3 | 11.4 | 9.5 |
| Point Distribution | |||
| 3-pointers % | 29.3 | 54.7 | 31.4 |
| 2-pointers % | 52.2 | 29.6 | 48.8 |
| Free throws % | 18.6 | 15.7 | 19.8 |
Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.
Rotation Depth
- Effective Rotation Size
- 8.0
- Top Three Share of Minutes
- 48%
- Bench Share of Minutes
- 27%
- Players with Logged Minutes
- 11
Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions
Schedule and Results
| Date | Opponent | Result | Poss. | Site | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11-03 | Toledo | W 76–74 | 63.7 | Away | 1–0 |
| 11-06 | Alcorn | W 76–70 | 72.0 | Home | 2–0 |
| 11-13 | Central Mich. | W 66–64 | 61.3 | Neutral | 3–0 |
| 11-15 | Coppin St. | W 72–62 | 66.6 | Neutral | 4–0 |
| 11-19 | Jacksonville St. | W 71–65 | 66.2 | Away | 5–0 |
| 11-21 | UAB | L 72–80 | 63.9 | Away | 5–1 |
| 11-30 | UTSA | W 82–58 | 71.0 | Away | 6–1 |
| 12-05 | ETSU | L 65–91 | 69.4 | Away | 6–2 |
| 12-14 | North Texas | L 57–58 | 64.0 | Home | 6–3 |
| 12-17 | ULM | W 96–92 2OT | 87.5 | Away | 7–3 |
| 12-20 | Texas St. | L 65–67 | 65.5 | Away | 7–4 |
| 12-31 | Louisiana | W 63–58 | 55.9 | Away | 8–4 |
| 01-03 | Troy | L 49–59 | 58.7 | Away | 8–5 |
| 01-10 | Ga. Southern | W 87–71 | 72.7 | Home | 9–5 |
| 01-15 | Arkansas St. | W 91–87 1OT | 82.2 | Home | 10–5 |
| 01-17 | Louisiana | L 56–59 | 57.3 | Home | 10–6 |
| 01-22 | James Madison | W 90–83 | 75.7 | Away | 11–6 |
| 01-29 | Coastal Carolina | W 53–48 | 60.0 | Home | 12–6 |
| 01-31 | Georgia St. | W 69–67 | 60.1 | Home | 13–6 |
| 02-04 | App State | L 57–65 | 58.4 | Away | 13–7 |
| 02-07 | Buffalo | W 81–69 | 69.6 | Home | 14–7 |
| 02-12 | Southern Miss. | W 84–78 | 74.9 | Away | 15–7 |
| 02-14 | Arkansas St. | W 92–88 1OT | 76.3 | Away | 16–7 |
| 02-16 | Marshall | L 80–84 | 64.7 | Away | 16–8 |
| 02-19 | Texas St. | L 82–90 1OT | 72.8 | Home | 16–9 |
| 02-21 | Troy | W 65–54 | 58.5 | Home | 17–9 |
| 02-25 | ULM | W 89–54 | 67.3 | Home | 18–9 |
| 02-27 | Southern Miss. | L 55–68 | 64.7 | Home | 18–10 |
| 03-06 | Ga. Southern | L 85–94 | 67.2 | Neutral | 18–11 |
| 03-17 | Auburn | L 67–78 | 64.2 | — | 18–12 |
Roster · 11 players
Player logs in 30 of 30 team games
| Column groups | Minutes | Per 40 Minutes | Shooting | Last Five Team Games | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | G | MPG | Team Min% | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | 2P | 2P% | 3P | 3P% | FT | FT% | eFG% | TS% | FTA/FGA | G | MPG | Min% | Pts/G |
| Adam Olsen | 29 | 36:14 | 85.8% | 18.7 | 4.6 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 50–127 | 39.4% | 98–246 | 39.8% | 96–114 | 84.2% | 52.8% | 57.9% | 30.6% | 4 | 33:09 −3:06 | 66.3% | 18.8 +1.9 |
| Chaze Harris | 30 | 33:03 | 81.0% | 23.8 | 6.0 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 223–400 | 55.8% | 4–22 | 18.2%† | 133–233 | 57.1% | 54.3% | 56.3% | 55.2% | 5 | 34:51 +1:48 | 87.1% | 20.2 +0.5 |
| Jayden Cooper | 30 | 30:36 | 75.0% | 14.9 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 72–155 | 46.5% | 52–152 | 34.2% | 43–65 | 66.2% | 48.9% | 51.1% | 21.2% | 5 | 32:44 +2:07 | 81.8% | 12.0 +0.6 |
| Randy Brady | 30 | 27:01 | 66.2% | 7.9 | 8.2 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.8 | 31–54 | 57.4% | 17–54 | 31.5% | 47–74 | 63.5% | 52.3% | 56.9% | 68.5% | 5 | 25:38 −1:23 | 64.1% | 4.2 −1.1 |
| Hantz Louis Jeune | 30 | 23:30 | 57.6% | 7.5 | 5.2 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 19–39 | 48.7% | 26–93 | 28.0% | 17–24 | 70.8%† | 43.9% | 46.6% | 18.2% | 5 | 29:32 +6:01 | 73.8% | 7.6 +3.2 |
| Stephen Williams | 30 | 15:36 | 38.2% | 15.8 | 11.1 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 3.2 | 81–120 | 67.5% | 0–0 | — | 23–38 | 60.5% | 67.5% | 67.7% | 31.7% | 5 | 17:11 +1:35 | 43.0% | 7.0 +0.8 |
| John Broom | 29 | 14:26 | 34.2% | 5.4 | 7.3 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 12–21 | 57.1%† | 10–32 | 31.3%† | 2–3 | 66.7%† | 50.9%† | 51.5%† | 5.7%† | 5 | 19:54 +5:29 | 49.8% | 3.6 +1.7 |
| JJ Wheat | 30 | 12:54 | 31.6% | 11.2 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 5.9 | 35–69 | 50.7%† | 5–12 | 41.7%† | 23–45 | 51.1% | 52.5%† | 53.6%† | 55.6%† | 5 | 11:29 −1:25 | 28.7% | 2.0 −1.6 |
| Peyton LawFew games | 8 | 25:18 | 16.5% | 19.8 | 9.1 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 4.0 | 44–63 | 69.8%† | 0–1 | 0.0%† | 12–17 | 70.6%† | 68.8%† | 69.9%† | 26.6%† | — | — | — | — |
| Brian Hawthorne | 17 | 8:53 | 12.3% | 6.4 | 5.6 | 3.7 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 5–24 | 20.8%† | 1–8 | 12.5%† | 11–18 | 61.1%† | 20.3%† | 30.1%† | 56.3%† | 1 | 3:09 −5:44 | 1.6% | 0.0 −1.4 |
| Maxwell LandFew gamesUnder 100 minutes | 4 | 1:39 | 0.5% | 18.3 | 12.2 | 6.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.1 | 0.0 | 0–0 | — | 1–2 | 50.0%† | 0–0 | — | 75.0%† | 75.0%† | 0.0%† | 2 | 1:58 +0:19 | 2.0% | 1.5 +0.8 |
| Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes | 30 games | 71.6 | 34.1 | 11.7 | not published | 2.1 | 8.6 | not published | 572–1072 | 53.4% | 214–622 | 34.4% | 407–631 | 64.5% | 52.7% | 55.6% | 37.2% | ||||||
| Sum of players | 71.6 | 30.1 | 11.7 | 7.7 | 2.1 | 8.1 | 12.8 | Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals. | |||||||||||||||
| Residual: team minus players | 0.0 | +3.9 | +0.0 | not published | 0.0 | +0.5 | not published | ||||||||||||||||
G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.
Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β
Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.
- Team Pool
- $270K
- 80% Range $100K to $720K
- Tier
- Low and other
- low evidence
- Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $245K to $285K
- Scenario medians
- Players with Figures
- 11
- 1 floor only
| Player | Poss. Share | Speculative Best Guess | 80% Range | Range Graphic | Median % of Team Pool | Scenarios Z1 to Z4 | Floor Part | Evidence and Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam Olsen | 85.5% | $49K | $17K to $135K | 18.0% | $45K to $51K | $2K | Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data | |
| Chaze Harris | 82.3% | $65K | $21K to $185K | 22.1% | $59K to $68K | $2K | Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data | |
| Jayden Cooper | 75.0% | $24K | $3K to $82K | 11.5% | $22K to $25K | $2K | Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data | |
| Randy Brady | 64.6% | $26K | $5K to $84K | 11.3% | $24K to $27K | $2K | Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data | |
| Hantz Louis Jeune | 57.8% | $18K | $3K to $61K | 8.6% | $16K to $19K | $2K | Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data | |
| Stephen Williams | 38.9% | $27K | $8K to $86K | 9.3% | $25K to $28K | $2K | Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data | |
| John Broom | 33.9% | $8K | $2K to $31K | 4.1% | $8K to $9K | $2K | Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data | |
| JJ Wheat | 31.5% | $7K | $1K to $27K | 3.3% | $6K to $7K | $2K | Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data | |
| Peyton Law | 18.4% | $16K | $5K to $48K | 5.4% | $14K to $17K | $2K | Sufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data | |
| Brian Hawthorne | 11.7% | $4K | $1K to $13K | 1.4% | $3K to $4K | $2K | Limited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data | |
| Maxwell Land | 0.3% | $2K | $1K to $7K | 0.9% | $2K in all four | $2K | Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data | |
| Team Pool | — | $270K | $100K to $720K | 100% | $245K to $285K | — |
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)
Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.
| Measure | School-Reported Amount | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Men's basketball revenue | $2,876,915 | |
| Men's basketball expenses | $2,527,029 | |
| Athletics department expenses | $32,559,740 | |
| Athletics department revenue | $32,559,740 |
Team Totalsβ
Season per 40 minutes, 30 games, 2,012 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1225 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions
| Statistic | Team | Opponents |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 71.6 | 69.7 |
| Field goals made | 25.7 | 23.0 |
| Field goals attempted | 55.3 | 58.6 |
| 3-pointers made | 7.0 | 12.7 |
| 3-pointers attempted | 20.3 | 38.0 |
| Free throws made | 13.3 | 11.0 |
| Free throws attempted | 20.6 | 15.0 |
| Offensive rebounds | 8.4 | 11.5 |
| Defensive rebounds | 25.7 | 24.8 |
| Total rebounds | 34.1 | 36.3 |
| Assists | 11.7 | 16.4 |
| Blocks | 2.1 | 4.0 |
| Turnovers | 8.6 | 11.9 |
| Steals | No team figure. Players sum to 236. | |
| Personal fouls | No team figure. Players sum to 391. | |
| Minutes (derived) | 200.0 | not published |
30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions
| Statistic | Status | Team Total, Logged Games | Sum of Players | Residual | Tolerance | Team Total, Games Without Logs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | Reconciled | 2,193 | 2,193 | 0 | ±11.0 | 0 |
| Field goals made | Reconciled | 786 | 786 | 0 | ±3.9 | 0 |
| Field goals attempted | Reconciled | 1,694 | 1,694 | 0 | ±8.5 | 0 |
| 3-pointers made | Reconciled | 214 | 214 | 0 | ±2.0 | 0 |
| 3-pointers attempted | Reconciled | 622 | 622 | 0 | ±3.1 | 0 |
| Free throws made | Reconciled | 407 | 407 | 0 | ±2.0 | 0 |
| Free throws attempted | Reconciled | 631 | 631 | 0 | ±3.2 | 0 |
| Offensive rebounds | No player split | not published | not published | not published | not published | not published |
| Defensive rebounds | No player split | not published | not published | not published | not published | not published |
| Total rebounds | Residual shown | 1,043 | 923 | +120 | ±83.4 | 0 |
| Assists | Reconciled | 359 | 358 | +1 | ±2.0 | 0 |
| Blocks | Reconciled | 65 | 65 | 0 | ±2.0 | 0 |
| Turnovers | Residual shown | 263 | 249 | +14 | ±7.9 | 0 |
| Steals | No team figure | not published | 236 | not published | not published | not published |
| Personal fouls | No team figure | not published | 391 | not published | not published | not published |
| Minutes (derived) | Reconciled | 6,125 | 6,110 | +14.9 | ±122.5 | 0 |
Model-Implied Player Valueβ
Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.
| Player | Poss. Share | Net and Rangeβ | Range Graphic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adam Olsen | 85.5% | +1.4range +0.4 to +2.2Sufficient evidence | |
| Chaze Harris | 82.3% | +2.2range +1.1 to +3.2Sufficient evidence | |
| Jayden Cooper | 75.0% | -0.1range -1.3 to +1.4Sufficient evidence | |
| Randy Brady | 64.6% | +0.4range -1.0 to +1.9Sufficient evidence | |
| Hantz Louis Jeune | 57.8% | -0.1range -0.9 to +0.8Sufficient evidence | |
| Stephen Williams | 38.9% | +1.7range +0.5 to +3.3Sufficient evidence | |
| John Broom | 33.9% | -0.8range -1.6 to +0.1Sufficient evidence | |
| JJ Wheat | 31.5% | -1.2range -2.3 to -0.0Sufficient evidence | |
| Peyton Law | 18.4% | +2.0range +1.1 to +3.1Sufficient evidence | |
| Brian Hawthorne | 11.7% | -1.8range -2.7 to -0.7Limited evidence | |
| Maxwell Land | 0.3% | Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence |
Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β
Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology
- Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
- +10.1range +9.3 to +11.1Sufficient evidence
200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.
10 valued players hold 99.9% of on-court time. 1 without a value (under 300 possessions) holds 0.1%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.3%.