Randy Brady
South Alabama · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
810:28 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 27:01
- Points per game
- 5.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.5 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.3 | 5.5 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 7.9 | 8.2 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 160 | 166 | 54 | 40 | 10 | 31 | 76 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 48–108 | 44.4% | 3.6 | 5.3 |
| 2P | 31–54 | 57.4%† | 1.8 | 2.7 |
| 3P | 17–54 | 31.5% | 1.8 | 2.7 |
| FT | 47–74 | 63.5% | 2.5 | 3.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.3% | 56.9% | 50.0% | 68.5% | 1.74 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
South Alabama · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $26K
- 80% range $5K to $84K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.3%
- team pool $270K, 80% range $100K to $720K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $24K to $27K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 64.6%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
South Alabama: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | South Alabama | $26Kspeculative | $5K to $84K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.4 | -1.0 to +1.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +0.2 | +4.2range +3.6 to +5.0 | 2,239 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | South Alabama | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.1 | -0.0 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +0.9 | +1.6range +1.4 to +1.9 | 1,138 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Chattanooga | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.0 | -0.6 to +2.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | +0.0 | +2.5range +1.9 to +3.3 | 2,028 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Chattanooga | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.4 | -2.6 to -0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -0.9 | +1.2range +0.9 to +1.5 | 1,247 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 25:38 | 27:01 | 10:02–45:03 | |
| Points | 4.2 | 5.3 | 0.0–12.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 41.0% | 48.8% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-17 | Auburn | L 67–78 | 24:29 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-06 | Ga. Southern | L 85–94 | 17:41 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-27 | Southern Miss. | L 55–68 | 30:57 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | ULM | W 89–54 | 28:14 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Troy | W 65–54 | 26:47 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | Texas St. | L 82–90 | 31:52 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-16 | Marshall | L 80–84 | 11:39 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Arkansas St. | W 92–88 | 31:18 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 4-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Southern Miss. | W 84–78 | 24:58 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Buffalo | W 81–69 | 30:15 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 68.8% |
| 2026-02-04 | App State | L 57–65 | 31:13 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-6 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-31 | Georgia St. | W 69–67 | 22:10 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | Coastal Carolina | W 53–48 | 34:36 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-22 | James Madison | W 90–83 | 18:24 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Louisiana | L 56–59 | 25:35 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-15 | Arkansas St. | W 91–87 | 27:07 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Ga. Southern | W 87–71 | 10:02 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | — |
| 2026-01-03 | Troy | L 49–59 | 13:44 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Louisiana | W 63–58 | 32:54 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Texas St. | L 65–67 | 27:15 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | ULM | W 96–92 | 45:03 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-14 | North Texas | L 57–58 | 37:10 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-05 | ETSU | L 65–91 | 24:59 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-30 | UTSA | W 82–58 | 28:30 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | UAB | L 72–80 | 31:52 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 83.3% |
| 2025-11-19 | Jacksonville St. | W 71–65 | 31:05 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Coppin St. | W 72–62 | 25:27 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-13 | Central Mich. | W 66–64 | 31:55 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-06 | Alcorn | W 76–70 | 29:48 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Toledo | W 76–74 | 23:29 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 3-7 | 66.7% |