Adam Olsen
South Alabama · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1050:53 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 36:14
- Points per game
- 16.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.1 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 16.9 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.7 | 4.6 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| Season totals | 490 | 120 | 28 | 29 | 3 | 30 | 26 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 148–373 | 39.7% | 12.9 | 14.2 |
| 2P | 50–127 | 39.4% | 4.4 | 4.8 |
| 3P | 98–246 | 39.8% | 8.5 | 9.4 |
| FT | 96–114 | 84.2% | 3.9 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.8% | 57.9% | 66.0% | 30.6% | 0.93 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
South Alabama · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $49K
- 80% range $17K to $135K
- Median share of team pool
- 18.0%
- team pool $270K, 80% range $100K to $720K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $45K to $51K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 85.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
South Alabama: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | South Alabama | $49Kspeculative | $17K to $135K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.4 | +0.4 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | +0.5 | +6.1range +5.3 to +6.7 | 2,963 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 35:29 | 36:14 | 24:38–49:05 | |
| Points | 19.4 | 16.9 | 4.0–29.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 57.8% | 50.9% | 15.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Ga. Southern | L 85–94 | 25:11 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-11 | 3-5 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-27 | Southern Miss. | L 55–68 | 36:44 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-10 | 2-8 | 8-9 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | ULM | W 89–54 | 32:05 | 29 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-15 | 8-13 | 3-3 | 86.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Troy | W 65–54 | 38:35 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-9 | 3-7 | 3-3 | 72.2% |
| 2026-02-19 | Texas St. | L 82–90 | 44:52 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-17 | 5-13 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-16 | Marshall | L 80–84 | 36:21 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-15 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Arkansas St. | W 92–88 | 44:22 | 27 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9-21 | 7-15 | 2-4 | 59.5% |
| 2026-02-12 | Southern Miss. | W 84–78 | 37:13 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1-10 | 1-8 | 1-3 | 15.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Buffalo | W 81–69 | 34:07 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-11 | 4-7 | 7-9 | 72.7% |
| 2026-02-04 | App State | L 57–65 | 37:30 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-14 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 21.4% |
| 2026-01-31 | Georgia St. | W 69–67 | 38:35 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-10 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | Coastal Carolina | W 53–48 | 37:38 | 16 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-19 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 36.8% |
| 2026-01-22 | James Madison | W 90–83 | 38:05 | 26 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-16 | 4-10 | 6-7 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | Louisiana | L 56–59 | 36:41 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-10 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 45.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Arkansas St. | W 91–87 | 40:03 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4-12 | 2-7 | 4-6 | 41.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | Ga. Southern | W 87–71 | 36:40 | 22 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8-17 | 6-10 | 0-2 | 64.7% |
| 2026-01-03 | Troy | L 49–59 | 24:38 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-10 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Louisiana | W 63–58 | 33:12 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7-13 | 2-6 | 10-10 | 61.5% |
| 2025-12-20 | Texas St. | L 65–67 | 38:28 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-12 | 2-8 | 10-11 | 41.7% |
| 2025-12-17 | ULM | W 96–92 | 49:05 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-19 | 4-13 | 2-2 | 47.4% |
| 2025-12-14 | North Texas | L 57–58 | 39:55 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 41.7% |
| 2025-12-05 | ETSU | L 65–91 | 32:38 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-12 | 4-8 | 1-1 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-30 | UTSA | W 82–58 | 29:35 | 20 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-13 | 5-11 | 3-4 | 65.4% |
| 2025-11-21 | UAB | L 72–80 | 36:59 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-12 | 4-10 | 4-4 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-19 | Jacksonville St. | W 71–65 | 31:47 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-7 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 21.4% |
| 2025-11-15 | Coppin St. | W 72–62 | 36:26 | 25 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9-12 | 6-9 | 1-1 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-13 | Central Mich. | W 66–64 | 32:47 | 21 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-18 | 4-11 | 5-5 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-06 | Alcorn | W 76–70 | 32:44 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Toledo | W 76–74 | 37:57 | 23 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8-18 | 5-11 | 2-3 | 58.3% |