Chaze Harris
South Alabama · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
991:39 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 33:03
- Points per game
- 19.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.9 / 5.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 19.7 | 4.9 | 5.1 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 23.8 | 6.0 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 591 | 148 | 154 | 48 | 8 | 99 | 74 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 227–422 | 53.8% | 14.1 | 17.0 |
| 2P | 223–400 | 55.8% | 13.3 | 16.1 |
| 3P | 4–22 | 18.2%† | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| FT | 133–233 | 57.1% | 7.8 | 9.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.3% | 56.3% | 5.2% | 55.2% | 1.56 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
South Alabama · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $65K
- 80% range $21K to $185K
- Median share of team pool
- 22.1%
- team pool $270K, 80% range $100K to $720K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $59K to $68K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 82.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
South Alabama: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | South Alabama | $65Kspeculative | $21K to $185K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.2 | +1.1 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +1.8 | +0.4 | +6.2range +5.6 to +6.9 | 2,851 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:51 | 33:03 | 20:08–46:40 | |
| Points | 20.2 | 19.7 | 3.0–38.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.2% | 54.3% | 14.3%–81.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-17 | Auburn | L 67–78 | 37:52 | 29 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12-26 | 1-3 | 4-9 | 48.1% |
| 2026-03-06 | Ga. Southern | L 85–94 | 37:12 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 5-17 | 0-0 | 7-12 | 29.4% |
| 2026-02-27 | Southern Miss. | L 55–68 | 37:15 | 23 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9-18 | 0-1 | 5-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | ULM | W 89–54 | 26:39 | 15 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Troy | W 65–54 | 35:19 | 17 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 8-15 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 53.3% |
| 2026-02-19 | Texas St. | L 82–90 | 40:11 | 28 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 11-15 | 0-0 | 6-10 | 73.3% |
| 2026-02-16 | Marshall | L 80–84 | 36:01 | 28 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 11-20 | 0-1 | 6-8 | 55.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Arkansas St. | W 92–88 | 38:56 | 30 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8-17 | 2-2 | 12-14 | 52.9% |
| 2026-02-12 | Southern Miss. | W 84–78 | 33:42 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9-11 | 0-0 | 8-17 | 81.8% |
| 2026-02-07 | Buffalo | W 81–69 | 25:01 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | App State | L 57–65 | 27:28 | 17 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6-11 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Georgia St. | W 69–67 | 30:21 | 15 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6-11 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-29 | Coastal Carolina | W 53–48 | 35:17 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-14 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | James Madison | W 90–83 | 20:08 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 5-11 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-17 | Louisiana | L 56–59 | 35:22 | 18 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9-15 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Arkansas St. | W 91–87 | 40:19 | 38 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 14-25 | 0-4 | 10-15 | 56.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Ga. Southern | W 87–71 | 35:23 | 21 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9-16 | 0-0 | 3-8 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | Troy | L 49–59 | 33:53 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 4-9 | 77.8% |
| 2025-12-31 | Louisiana | W 63–58 | 33:46 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 56.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | Texas St. | L 65–67 | 39:31 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 9-20 | 0-1 | 4-10 | 45.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | ULM | W 96–92 | 46:40 | 38 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 16-22 | 0-2 | 6-8 | 72.7% |
| 2025-12-14 | North Texas | L 57–58 | 33:48 | 20 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 6-14 | 0-0 | 8-13 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-05 | ETSU | L 65–91 | 23:37 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 14.3% |
| 2025-11-30 | UTSA | W 82–58 | 25:31 | 16 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | UAB | L 72–80 | 35:51 | 25 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10-17 | 0-0 | 5-10 | 58.8% |
| 2025-11-19 | Jacksonville St. | W 71–65 | 34:20 | 19 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9-14 | 0-1 | 1-5 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-15 | Coppin St. | W 72–62 | 23:59 | 13 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-13 | Central Mich. | W 66–64 | 31:40 | 20 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8-14 | 0-1 | 4-11 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-06 | Alcorn | W 76–70 | 28:24 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Toledo | W 76–74 | 28:13 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 50.0% |