Quinn Woidke
Kent St. · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
617:57 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 19:19
- Points per game
- 9.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.0 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.6 | 5.3 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 4.6 |
| Season totals | 288 | 82 | 44 | 20 | 1 | 29 | 71 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 84–200 | 42.0% | 6.3 | 12.9 |
| 2P | 20–41 | 48.8%† | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| 3P | 64–159 | 40.3% | 5.0 | 10.3 |
| FT | 56–69 | 81.2% | 2.2 | 4.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58.0% | 62.5% | 79.5% | 34.5% | 1.52 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Kent · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $29K
- 80% range $8K to $88K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.1%
- team pool $295K, 80% range $110K to $740K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $27K to $31K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 46.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Kent: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Kent | $29Kspeculative | $8K to $88K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.6 | +0.2 to +2.9 | Sufficient evidence | +1.7 | -0.1 | +3.7range +3.2 to +4.2 | 2,035 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 20:40 | 19:19 | 10:26–30:48 | |
| Points | 9.0 | 9.0 | 0.0–19.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 45.3% | 63.4% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-18 | Illinois St. | L 58–79 | 17:17 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-13 | Akron | L 68–75 | 18:07 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-9 | 2-8 | 6-6 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-12 | Ohio | W 86–75 | 16:59 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-03-06 | Western Mich. | W 86–78 | 20:07 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-7 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 107.1% |
| 2026-03-03 | NIU | W 102–76 | 30:48 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-9 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 61.1% |
| 2026-02-27 | Akron | L 70–92 | 14:33 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Central Mich. | W 83–81 | 21:38 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-4 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 137.5% |
| 2026-02-17 | Bowling Green | W 78–71 | 13:25 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 150.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Ball St. | W 75–68 | 16:02 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-10 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 55.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | Eastern Mich. | W 95–91 | 16:21 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-07 | Southern Miss. | L 65–66 | 20:04 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-6 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | Toledo | W 75–72 | 17:36 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-30 | Akron | L 52–69 | 15:27 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-27 | Ohio | W 72–57 | 14:37 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Eastern Mich. | W 76–75 | 18:59 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 78.6% |
| 2026-01-20 | Miami (OH) | L 101–107 | 20:08 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-16 | Toledo | W 87–84 | 21:04 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-4 | 0-4 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-13 | Buffalo | W 87–81 | 28:36 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-8 | 4-7 | 1-1 | 87.5% |
| 2026-01-10 | Central Mich. | L 85–87 | 14:55 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-8 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-06 | Bowling Green | W 96–93 | 24:37 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | NIU | W 77–73 | 15:08 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 5-7 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Purdue | L 60–101 | 23:44 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-13 | 1-8 | 0-0 | 34.6% |
| 2025-12-20 | Massachusetts | W 69–59 | 29:17 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-15 | 4-13 | 3-4 | 53.3% |
| 2025-12-14 | Portland | L 78–88 | 20:39 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-6 | 4-5 | 5-5 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Austin Peay | W 96–84 | 14:59 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 150.0% |
| 2025-11-22 | Cleveland St. | W 91–71 | 18:42 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 4-5 | 90.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Eastern Ky. | W 93–78 | 26:48 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-7 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-16 | Wright St. | W 76–72 | 28:02 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1-5 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Cleveland St. | W 102–95 | 12:54 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-10 | UNCW | W 86–77 | 17:01 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-12 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 70.8% |
| 2025-11-07 | Cornell | W 110–102 | 10:26 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 83.3% |
| 2025-11-03 | Troy | L 97–103 | 18:57 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 50.0% |