Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Purdue Fort Wayne

Horz · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 267 · Raw net -6.6 · Tempo 69.0 · 29 Division I games · Through 2026-03-03

All seasons
Record
14–15
14 wins
AdjNet
-6.3β
rank 258 of 365
AdjO
105.7β
rank 233 of 365
AdjD
111.9β
rank 268 of 365
AdjT
68.7β
SOS
-0.8β
rank 189 of 363
NCSOS
5.6β
WAB
-8.6β
rank 199 of 363
RR
2.8β
Exp. W
11.2β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.107.5196114.1308108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%52.612556.134551.4
TO / 100 poss.14.54419.14516.7
Offensive rebound %22.935134.532730.6
FTA / FGA %30.629328.53635.0
Shooting
3P%34.216437.935433.9
2P%53.79855.531751.7
FT%70.724676.234972.5
Style
3PA / FGA %45.344.139.5
Assists / FGM %49.855.952.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %9.28.39.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %36.737.431.4
2-pointers %46.346.348.8
Free throws %17.116.219.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.1
Top Three Share of Minutes
47%
Bench Share of Minutes
27%
Players with Logged Minutes
11

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03Grand CanyonL 71–9075.1Away0–1
11-07Ohio St.L 68–9472.6Away0–2
11-12Western Mich.L 71–8375.9Away0–3
11-18UtahL 77–8566.4Away0–4
11-21Saint LouisL 60–9170.4Away0–5
11-25Chicago St.W 90–7768.1Home1–5
12-03OaklandL 92–10177.0Away1–6
12-06Northern Ky.W 79–7775.5Home2–6
12-10Eastern Mich.W 80–6566.0Home3–6
12-14Detroit MercyW 81–7768.2Home4–6
12-21Notre DameW 72–6969.6Away5–6
12-29MilwaukeeL 55–7767.4Away5–7
01-01Green BayL 54–7261.8Home5–8
01-04Cleveland St.W 74–7167.1Home6–8
01-07Youngstown St.W 71–6966.6Away7–8
01-11Robert MorrisW 79–7464.4Away8–8
01-18MilwaukeeW 100–8273.0Home9–8
01-21Detroit MercyW 83–7672.0Away10–8
01-28OaklandL 65–7469.4Home10–9
01-31Robert MorrisW 83–7169.9Home11–9
02-04Youngstown St.L 61–9063.5Home11–10
02-07Wright St.L 68–7362.3Away11–11
02-12Green BayL 59–7658.9Away11–12
02-15IU IndyW 83–7875.0Home12–12
02-18Northern Ky.L 71–8771.2Away12–13
02-22Cleveland St.W 92–8676.2Away13–13
02-25Wright St.L 70–7470.9Home13–14
02-28IU IndyW 87–8169.6Away14–14
03-03Green BayL 56–6457.9—14–15

Roster · 11 players

Player logs in 29 of 29 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groupsMinutesSeason TotalsShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Corey Hadnot II2933:4184.2%59610810354106357167–28558.6%54–15235.5%100–14768.0%56.8%59.4%33.6%535:04 +1:2387.7%21.2 +0.6
Mikale Stevenson2931:2078.3%41610887444665096–20347.3%52–14735.4%68–8778.2%49.7%53.6%24.9%532:53 +1:3382.2%10.0 −4.3
DeAndre Craig2929:3774.0%3969379361446181–18543.8%46–12636.5%96–12278.7%48.2%54.3%39.2%529:25 −0:1273.5%16.0 +2.3
Maximus Nelson2928:4571.9%228992219517613–837.5%67–18236.8%21–2584.0%54.5%56.7%13.2%531:58 +3:1379.9%8.0 +0.1
Darius Duffy2922:0655.3%145125182024155866–9073.3%†0–0—13–4528.9%73.3%†66.0%†50.0%†515:51 −6:1539.6%3.6 −1.4
Deangelo Elisee2913:2833.7%112757935176647–6968.1%†1–250.0%†15–2462.5%†68.3%†68.7%†33.8%†518:05 +4:3745.2%7.0 +3.1
EJ Mosley2912:0830.4%80291862101513–3141.9%†12–4129.3%†18–2185.7%†43.1%†49.2%†29.2%†511:46 −0:2229.4%3.8 +1.0
Chris Morgan2414:3230.1%55232211110396–1442.9%†9–3426.5%†16–2080.0%†40.6%†48.4%†41.7%†513:10 −1:2132.9%3.0 +0.7
Yuval Levin298:5122.1%704315222133012–2842.9%†11–3928.2%†13–2161.9%†42.5%†45.9%†31.3%†511:38 +2:4729.1%2.6 +0.2
Ebrahim Kaba1711:1816.6%454078314196–1346.2%†10–4025.0%†3–3100.0%†39.6%†41.4%†5.7%†————
Mason ShroutUnder 100 minutes102:352.2%91110161–250.0%†1–714.3%†4–4100.0%†27.8%†41.8%†44.4%†————
Team, games with logs · season totals29 games2152841379not published88291not published498–92853.7%263–77034.2%367–51970.7%52.6%55.9%30.6%
Sum of players215274437923087270462Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0+970not published+1+21not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$195K
80% Range $74K to $530K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$180K to $245K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
11
1 floor only

The widest scenario range, $91K to $660K, is wider than the 80% Range above (soft check S5). Methodology

Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Corey Hadnot II85.0%$51K$16K to $165K23.8%$47K to $63K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mikale Stevenson78.2%$13K$1K to $51K10.0%$12K to $17K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
DeAndre Craig74.6%$23K$3K to $76K14.1%$22K to $29K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Maximus Nelson71.9%$15K$1K to $57K10.7%$14K to $18K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Darius Duffy55.9%$14K$2K to $48K9.5%$13K to $18K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Deangelo Elisee34.3%$28K$9K to $100K12.5%$26K to $35K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
EJ Mosley29.9%$7K$1K to $23K4.6%$6K to $8K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Chris Morgan28.7%$4K$1K to $14K1.5%$3K to $4K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Yuval Levin21.6%$9K$2K to $27K4.9%$8K to $11K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ebrahim Kaba17.5%$4K$1K to $14K2.7%$4K to $5K$2KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Mason Shrout2.3%$2K$1K to $5K0.9%$2K in all four$2KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$195K$74K to $530K100%$180K to $245K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Purdue University Fort Wayne (NCAA Division I without football)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$3,420,827
Men's basketball expenses$2,646,771
Athletics department expenses$15,252,438
Athletics department revenue$15,252,438

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 29 games, 2,002 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points2,1522,284
Field goals made761814
Field goals attempted1,6981,706
3-pointers made263285
3-pointers attempted770752
Free throws made367371
Free throws attempted519487
Offensive rebounds228323
Defensive rebounds613768
Total rebounds8411,091
Assists379455
Blocks8877
Turnovers291382
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 230.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 462.
Minutes (derived)5,800not published

29 of 29 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,1522,1520±10.80
Field goals madeReconciled7617610±3.80
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,6981,6980±8.50
3-pointers madeReconciled2632630±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled7707700±3.90
Free throws madeReconciled3673670±2.00
Free throws attemptedReconciled5195190±2.60
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown841744+97±67.30
AssistsReconciled3793790±2.00
BlocksReconciled8887+1±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown291270+21±8.70
StealsNo team figurenot published230not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published462not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled5,8005,785+15.0±116.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Corey Hadnot II85.0%+1.3range +0.2 to +2.3Sufficient evidence
Mikale Stevenson78.2%-1.0range -2.1 to -0.0Sufficient evidence
DeAndre Craig74.6%+0.1range -1.1 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Maximus Nelson71.9%-0.7range -2.1 to +0.8Sufficient evidence
Darius Duffy55.9%-0.4range -1.7 to +0.7Sufficient evidence
Deangelo Elisee34.3%+2.1range +0.8 to +3.1Sufficient evidence
EJ Mosley29.9%-0.9range -2.1 to +0.3Sufficient evidence
Chris Morgan28.7%-2.6range -4.0 to -1.4Sufficient evidence
Yuval Levin21.6%+0.2range -0.9 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Ebrahim Kaba17.5%-1.3range -2.5 to -0.2Sufficient evidence
Mason Shrout2.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+9.3range +8.3 to +10.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 99.5% of on-court time. 1 without a value (under 300 possessions) holds 0.5%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value