Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Ark.-Pine Bluff

SWAC · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 319 · Raw net -11.0 · Tempo 71.2 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-12

All seasons
Record
11–19
11 wins
AdjNet
-12.8β
rank 328 of 365
AdjO
102.8β
rank 293 of 365
AdjD
115.6β
rank 330 of 365
AdjT
70.1β
SOS
-4.5β
rank 304 of 363
NCSOS
13.0β
WAB
-12.6β
rank 273 of 363
RR
0.1β
Exp. W
10.9β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.103.5280114.5316108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%50.023452.624951.4
TO / 100 poss.18.731016.518816.7
Offensive rebound %27.927034.232130.6
FTA / FGA %38.48943.634335.0
Shooting
3P%33.619033.213533.9
2P%49.826354.428751.7
FT%75.56675.733572.5
Style
3PA / FGA %37.237.339.5
Assists / FGM %56.353.852.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %7.98.79.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %29.126.931.4
2-pointers %48.549.348.8
Free throws %22.523.919.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
7.3
Top Three Share of Minutes
51%
Bench Share of Minutes
20%
Players with Logged Minutes
14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-03WashingtonL 50–9473.2Away0–1
11-06PortlandL 74–8382.5Away0–2
11-08LMU (CA)L 72–9470.8Away0–3
11-11OklahomaL 69–9569.8Away0–4
11-15VanderbiltL 75–10474.5Away0–5
11-18SMUL 60–10680.4Away0–6
11-20MarshallL 70–9876.7Away0–7
11-23Miami (OH)L 84–11181.5Away0–8
12-03UICW 63–6272.1Away1–8
12-06DePaulL 72–7673.9Away1–9
12-10TulsaL 84–11777.3Away1–10
01-03Alabama A&MW 95–8363.8Home2–10
01-05Alabama St.W 90–7974.9Home3–10
01-10Texas SouthernW 74–6669.3Away4–10
01-12Prairie ViewL 61–7369.3Away4–11
01-17Florida A&ML 67–7165.7Home4–12
01-19Bethune-CookmanL 82–87 1OT78.9Home4–13
01-24Southern U.W 75–7469.3Away5–13
01-31Mississippi Val.W 78–7071.2Away6–13
02-04GramblingW 67–6467.5Away7–13
02-07AlcornW 84–7766.3Home8–13
02-09Jackson St.W 84–6365.5Home9–13
02-14Alabama St.L 61–7972.4Away9–14
02-16Alabama A&ML 70–8263.4Away9–15
02-19Texas SouthernL 64–8368.3Home9–16
02-21Prairie ViewW 84–8267.9Home10–16
02-28Mississippi Val.L 69–7069.7Home10–17
03-03Jackson St.L 78–8169.3Away10–18
03-05AlcornW 83–4874.4Away11–18
03-12Southern U.L 81–8465.4Neutral11–19

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

Team roster, per 40 minutes
Column groupsMinutesPer 40 MinutesShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Quion Williams3036:1890.4%18.88.55.41.80.93.72.5152–31847.8%26–8431.0%129–17474.1%47.5%53.4%43.3%538:02 +1:4495.1%18.6 +1.6
Trevon Payton3034:1385.2%10.93.93.21.20.22.13.240–6858.8%58–12745.7%26–3574.3%65.1%66.5%17.9%535:16 +1:0488.2%9.6 +0.3
Alex Mirhosseini2931:4776.5%14.02.83.21.90.32.14.030–8137.0%72–21733.2%46–6471.9%46.3%49.4%21.5%533:06 +1:1982.7%12.0 +0.9
Milhan Charles3029:5874.6%14.15.31.91.10.72.42.7103–17558.9%6–2623.1%†92–12772.4%55.7%61.5%63.2%525:56 −4:0264.8%9.6 −0.9
Jaquan Scott3028:3771.3%21.69.51.51.30.83.45.4139–28249.3%14–4431.8%†144–16985.2%49.1%57.9%51.8%531:20 +2:4278.3%19.0 +3.5
Ramel Lloyd Jr.2020:4734.5%13.14.41.91.50.42.23.633–6650.0%13–4926.5%†31–4864.6%45.7%50.0%41.7%423:29 +2:4247.0%6.5 −0.3
Ahmad Johnson2711:1225.1%11.82.11.60.40.41.95.012–2646.2%†18–6229.0%11–1573.3%†44.3%†47.0%†17.0%†57:48 −3:2319.5%2.0 −1.3
Kyle Brown217:0212.2%6.28.91.91.11.60.86.86–2326.1%†2–728.6%†5–683.3%†30.0%†35.2%†20.0%†31:57 −5:052.9%0.7 −0.4
Dennis Asoro284:5411.4%8.78.21.21.20.93.212.814–2263.6%†0–0—2–728.6%†63.6%†59.8%†31.8%†56:34 +1:3916.4%2.0 +0.9
Jai’chaunn HayesFew games814:399.7%13.32.40.70.30.00.74.86–1346.2%†6–2030.0%†9–1181.8%†45.5%†51.5%†33.3%†————
Anthony SellarsUnder 100 minutes135:035.4%5.53.70.61.20.62.48.53–560.0%†0–30.0%†3–3100.0%†37.5%†48.3%†37.5%†24:54 −0:084.9%1.5 +0.8
Trejon WareFew gamesUnder 100 minutes118:121.5%0.02.22.22.20.04.46.60–10.0%†0–0—0–0—0.0%†0.0%†0.0%†————
Travis PourciauFew gamesUnder 100 minutes32:100.5%6.16.10.00.00.06.16.10–10.0%†0–0—1–250.0%†0.0%†26.6%†200.0%†————
Harrison PickettFew gamesUnder 100 minutes10:420.1%0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00–0—0–0—0–0————————
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes30 games73.731.914.1not published2.913.3not published538–108149.8%215–63933.6%499–66175.5%50.0%55.2%38.4%
Sum of players73.728.414.16.82.912.919.7Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.50.0not published+0.0+0.4not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$140K
80% Range $51K to $380K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$130K to $145K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
14
4 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Quion Williams91.4%$20K$1K to $67K17.7%$19K to $21K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Trevon Payton85.2%$6K$1K to $34K7.3%$5K to $6K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Alex Mirhosseini78.5%$11K$1K to $45K12.2%$10K to $11K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Milhan Charles75.1%$27K$4K to $115K17.7%$25K to $29K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jaquan Scott70.2%$24K$4K to $90K15.9%$22K to $25K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ramel Lloyd Jr.35.2%$9K$1K to $38K7.5%$9K to $10K$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ahmad Johnson23.3%$2K$1K to $11K2.2%$2K in all four$1KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kyle Brown12.8%$2K$1K to $7K1.9%$2K in all four$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Dennis Asoro11.4%$3K$1K to $10K2.6%$3K in all four$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Jai’chaunn Hayes9.0%$2K$0 to $6K1.3%$2K in all four$1KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Anthony Sellars5.8%$1K$0 to $3K0.7%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Trejon Ware1.6%$1K$0 to $3K0.7%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Travis Pourciau0.6%$1K$0 to $3K0.7%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Harrison Pickett0.1%$1K$0 to $3K0.7%$1K in all four$1KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$140K$51K to $380K100%$130K to $145K—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff (NCAA Division I-FCS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$731,790Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$731,790
Athletics department expenses$9,302,196
Athletics department revenue$9,302,196

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 30 games, 2,145 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1205 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
StatisticTeamOpponents
Points73.781.5
Field goals made25.027.4
Field goals attempted57.159.0
3-pointers made7.17.3
3-pointers attempted21.222.0
Free throws made16.619.5
Free throws attempted21.925.7
Offensive rebounds9.711.6
Defensive rebounds22.225.1
Total rebounds31.936.6
Assists14.114.7
Blocks2.93.1
Turnovers13.311.7
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 205.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 592.
Minutes (derived)200.0not published

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

Player lines against team totals
StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,2202,2200±11.10
Field goals madeReconciled7537530±3.80
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,7201,7200±8.60
3-pointers madeReconciled2152150±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled6396390±3.20
Free throws madeReconciled4994990±2.50
Free throws attemptedReconciled6616610±3.30
Offensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Defensive reboundsNo player splitnot publishednot publishednot publishednot publishednot published
Total reboundsResidual shown962857+105±77.00
AssistsReconciled4244240±2.10
BlocksReconciled8887+1±2.00
TurnoversReconciled401389+12±12.00
StealsNo team figurenot published205not publishednot publishednot published
Personal foulsNo team figurenot published592not publishednot publishednot published
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,0256,005+19.5±120.50

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Quion Williams91.4%-0.6range -1.4 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Trevon Payton85.2%-2.3range -3.4 to -0.9Sufficient evidence
Alex Mirhosseini78.5%-1.3range -2.4 to -0.0Sufficient evidence
Milhan Charles75.1%+0.1range -1.1 to +1.2Sufficient evidence
Jaquan Scott70.2%-0.1range -1.0 to +0.9Sufficient evidence
Ramel Lloyd Jr.35.2%-0.5range -1.9 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Ahmad Johnson23.3%-2.3range -3.3 to -1.2Sufficient evidence
Kyle Brown12.8%-2.0range -2.6 to -1.0Limited evidence
Dennis Asoro11.4%-0.9range -1.9 to +0.0Limited evidence
Jai’chaunn Hayes9.0%-2.0range -2.7 to -1.2Limited evidence
Anthony Sellars5.8%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Trejon Ware1.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Travis Pourciau0.6%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Harrison Pickett0.1%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+8.4range +7.5 to +9.3Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 98.4% of on-court time. 4 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 1.6%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 6.6%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value