Jaquan Scott
Ark.-Pine Bluff · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
858:40 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 28:37
- Points per game
- 15.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.8 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 15.5 | 6.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 3.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.6 | 9.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 5.4 |
| Season totals | 464 | 205 | 33 | 28 | 18 | 73 | 116 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 153–326 | 46.9% | 10.9 | 15.2 |
| 2P | 139–282 | 49.3% | 9.4 | 13.1 |
| 3P | 14–44 | 31.8%† | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| FT | 144–169 | 85.2% | 5.6 | 7.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.1% | 57.9% | 13.5% | 51.8% | 0.45 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Ark Pine Bluff · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $24K
- 80% range $4K to $90K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.9%
- team pool $140K, 80% range $51K to $380K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $22K to $25K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 70.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Ark Pine Bluff: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Ark Pine Bluff | $24Kspeculative | $4K to $90K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.1 | -1.0 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -0.3 | +3.4range +3.0 to +3.8 | 2,814 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:20 | 28:37 | 15:39–38:31 | |
| Points | 19.0 | 15.5 | 3.0–30.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 64.1% | 49.5% | 10.0%–108.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-12 | Southern U. | L 81–84 | 34:47 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7-11 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 63.6% |
| 2026-03-05 | Alcorn | W 83–48 | 24:21 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 54.5% |
| 2026-03-03 | Jackson St. | L 78–81 | 38:31 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 6-6 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Mississippi Val. | L 69–70 | 35:35 | 26 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7-13 | 0-3 | 12-15 | 53.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | Prairie View | W 84–82 | 23:24 | 18 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6-6 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 108.3% |
| 2026-02-19 | Texas Southern | L 64–83 | 37:00 | 15 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5-11 | 1-2 | 4-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-16 | Alabama A&M | L 70–82 | 30:02 | 21 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8-11 | 0-1 | 5-7 | 72.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Alabama St. | L 61–79 | 37:08 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 7-8 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | Jackson St. | W 84–63 | 26:46 | 18 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Alcorn | W 84–77 | 29:00 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Grambling | W 67–64 | 32:36 | 13 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Mississippi Val. | W 78–70 | 23:12 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2-10 | 0-1 | 7-8 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Southern U. | W 75–74 | 30:51 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 7-9 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-19 | Bethune-Cookman | L 82–87 | 26:20 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 71.4% |
| 2026-01-17 | Florida A&M | L 67–71 | 26:27 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-12 | Prairie View | L 61–73 | 30:00 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-9 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-10 | Texas Southern | W 74–66 | 28:18 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-13 | 1-3 | 3-5 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-05 | Alabama St. | W 90–79 | 15:39 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | Alabama A&M | W 95–83 | 32:55 | 24 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 7-11 | 1-3 | 9-10 | 68.2% |
| 2025-12-10 | Tulsa | L 84–117 | 26:46 | 30 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9-17 | 2-3 | 10-10 | 58.8% |
| 2025-12-06 | DePaul | L 72–76 | 19:11 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 78.6% |
| 2025-12-03 | UIC | W 63–62 | 16:06 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-23 | Miami (OH) | L 84–111 | 30:20 | 19 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7-16 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 43.8% |
| 2025-11-20 | Marshall | L 70–98 | 34:39 | 23 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 8-16 | 0-1 | 7-8 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | SMU | L 60–106 | 21:07 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5-12 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 45.8% |
| 2025-11-15 | Vanderbilt | L 75–104 | 22:04 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2025-11-11 | Oklahoma | L 69–95 | 32:25 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6-15 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 46.7% |
| 2025-11-08 | LMU (CA) | L 72–94 | 37:45 | 27 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10-19 | 1-3 | 6-6 | 55.3% |
| 2025-11-06 | Portland | L 74–83 | 27:23 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-10 | 0-2 | 12-12 | 10.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Washington | L 50–94 | 28:02 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5-18 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 30.6% |