Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Elon

CAA · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 233 · Raw net -3.6 · Tempo 67.9 · 30 Division I games · Through 2026-03-07

All seasons
Record
12–18
12 wins
AdjNet
-4.1β
rank 231 of 365
AdjO
110.1β
rank 135 of 365
AdjD
114.2β
rank 313 of 365
AdjT
67.9β
SOS
-1.0β
rank 199 of 363
NCSOS
-1.7β
WAB
-11.5β
rank 248 of 363
RR
-0.8β
Exp. W
12.8β

Scouting Report

CategoryOffenseDefenseD-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.111.3115114.8322108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%52.213754.030051.4
TO / 100 poss.15.913516.419316.7
Offensive rebound %32.211733.530730.6
FTA / FGA %33.522234.616535.0
Shooting
3P%34.315536.532733.9
2P%52.813853.324951.7
FT%71.422571.311772.5
Style
3PA / FGA %43.244.539.5
Assists / FGM %54.656.152.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %8.911.29.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %34.636.731.4
2-pointers %46.744.748.8
Free throws %18.718.619.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size
8.7
Top Three Share of Minutes
41%
Bench Share of Minutes
33%
Players with Logged Minutes
12

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

DateOpponentResultPoss.SiteRecord
11-08UNC GreensboroW 92–90 1OT74.5Away1–0
11-12MarshallL 89–9676.5Away1–1
11-15Gardner-WebbW 95–8475.5Home2–1
11-20Miami (FL)L 72–9973.2Away2–2
11-24App StateW 88–5361.0Away3–2
11-29MercerL 84–9176.8Home3–3
12-03FurmanL 88–9771.8Home3–4
12-06WoffordW 73–5260.9Away4–4
12-13NIUW 85–7970.8Home5–4
12-17RichmondW 73–7066.2Home6–4
12-20Virginia TechL 81–82 1OT69.5Away6–5
12-29NortheasternW 103–9172.0Home7–5
12-31Col. of CharlestonL 81–8573.6Home7–6
01-08N.C. A&TW 69–6467.9Away8–6
01-10CampbellW 83–8267.4Home9–6
01-15NortheasternL 78–8575.4Away9–7
01-17HofstraW 89–8566.4Away10–7
01-22TowsonL 59–7259.1Home10–8
01-24Col. of CharlestonL 70–8071.9Away10–9
01-29William & MaryW 79–7666.7Home11–9
01-31Stony BrookL 68–7269.0Home11–10
02-05HamptonL 79–87 2OT78.9Away11–11
02-07DrexelL 77–8267.6Home11–12
02-12UNCWL 54–6560.2Away11–13
02-14William & MaryW 81–7871.2Away12–13
02-21N.C. A&TL 82–10267.7Home12–14
02-26TowsonL 56–5861.6Away12–15
02-28MonmouthL 57–7363.1Away12–16
03-03UNCWL 57–7666.9Home12–17
03-07William & MaryL 62–7267.7Neutral12–18

Roster · 12 players

Player logs in 30 of 30 team games

MinutesPer 40 MinutesShootingLast Five Team Games
PlayerGMPGTeam Min%PtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF2P2P%3P3P%FTFT%eFG%TS%FTA/FGAGMPGMin%Pts/G
Chandler Cuthrell3028:4070.5%27.49.02.41.50.53.22.9168–30056.0%24–9924.2%182–25172.5%51.1%57.9%62.9%530:10 +1:3075.4%17.2 −2.5
Randall Pettus II3027:3767.9%15.94.41.82.00.62.72.949–11542.6%62–18134.3%46–6175.4%48.0%51.1%20.6%524:04 −3:3360.2%7.4 −3.6
Bryson Cokley3027:1467.0%18.25.71.90.90.21.53.770–13751.1%58–14540.0%58–7379.5%55.7%59.2%25.9%530:36 +3:2276.5%11.2 −1.2
Isaac Harrell3026:0964.3%11.95.70.71.10.30.53.042–6960.9%40–10837.0%30–4173.2%57.6%60.0%23.2%523:00 −3:0957.5%4.8 −3.0
Ja'Juan Carr3025:5763.8%11.24.36.70.90.42.02.264–13248.5%15–5527.3%44–6172.1%46.3%50.7%32.6%521:30 −4:2753.7%3.2 −4.0
Kacper Klaczek2228:4451.8%15.68.53.91.51.42.63.463–11455.3%30–6744.8%31–5062.0%59.7%60.8%27.6%427:14 −1:3054.5%8.0 −3.2
Ned Hull3017:4143.5%10.03.82.31.00.01.32.914–2751.9%31–8636.0%11–1384.6%†53.5%55.6%11.5%522:53 +5:1257.2%6.0 +1.6
DeMarco Johnson2814:3333.4%6.85.76.12.40.93.24.521–3461.8%†4–2020.0%†15–2951.7%50.0%†51.7%†53.7%†315:20 +0:4823.0%4.3 +1.9
Caleb Middleton279:2420.8%12.312.91.30.91.31.36.134–6254.8%†0–0—10–1566.7%†54.8%†56.9%†24.2%†513:54 +4:3034.8%3.4 +0.5
Bryson Spell226:4812.3%6.45.10.80.02.43.29.111–2250.0%†0–90.0%†2–2100.0%†35.5%†37.6%†6.5%†14:50 −1:582.4%0.0 −1.1
Iker Garmendia133:123.4%10.66.72.91.00.02.97.72–728.6%†2–633.3%†1–616.7%†38.5%†35.2%†46.2%†32:01 −1:113.0%1.0 +0.2
Alex Olander10:050.0%0.00.00.00.00.00.0481.90–0—0–0—0–0————————
Team, games with logs · per 40 team minutes30 games75.534.214.42.910.8538–101952.8%266–77634.3%430–60271.4%52.2%55.9%33.5%
Sum of players75.531.014.46.52.910.417.0Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players0.0+3.10.00.0+0.4

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool
$290K
80% Range $105K to $760K
Tier
Low and other
low evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4
$275K to $295K
Scenario medians
Players with Figures
11
1 floor only
Players in possession-share order
PlayerPoss. ShareSpeculative Best Guess80% RangeRange GraphicMedian % of Team PoolScenarios Z1 to Z4Floor PartEvidence and Flags
Chandler Cuthrell70.7%$72K$22K to $230K21.6%$69K to $74K$3KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Randall Pettus II68.4%$20K$2K to $74K10.0%$19K to $20K$3KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Bryson Cokley68.0%$19K$2K to $75K9.9%$19K to $20K$3KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Isaac Harrell66.5%$15K$2K to $66K7.8%$14K to $15K$3KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ja'Juan Carr64.1%$19K$2K to $73K9.5%$18K to $19K$3KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Kacper Klaczek50.3%$47K$14K to $145K14.5%$45K to $48K$3KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Ned Hull43.7%$25K$6K to $75K9.4%$24K to $25K$3KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
DeMarco Johnson32.2%$16K$3K to $49K6.5%$15K to $16K$3KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Caleb Middleton20.8%$9K$2K to $30K4.1%$9K in all four$3KSufficient evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Bryson Spell12.1%$4K$1K to $11K1.3%$3K to $4K$3KLimited evidenceRange driven by assumption, not data
Iker Garmendia3.3%$3K$1K to $7K0.9%$2K to $3K$3KFloor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimateRange driven by assumption, not data
Team Pool—$290K$105K to $760K100%$275K to $295K—

1 rostered player has no figure: no recorded possessions or no matched player record.

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, Elon University (NCAA Division I-FCS)
MeasureSchool-Reported AmountNote
Men's basketball revenue$3,262,775Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses$3,262,775
Athletics department expenses$38,201,825
Athletics department revenue$38,201,825

Team Totalsβ

Season per 40 minutes, 30 games, 2,071 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Per 40 uses 1220 game minutes, 5 per overtime period. Definitions

StatisticTeamOpponents
Points75.578.0
Field goals made26.427.0
Field goals attempted58.958.8
3-pointers made8.79.5
3-pointers attempted25.426.1
Free throws made14.114.5
Free throws attempted19.720.4
Offensive rebounds11.311.5
Defensive rebounds22.823.8
Total rebounds34.235.3
Assists14.415.1
Blocks2.93.7
Turnovers10.811.1
StealsNo team figure. Players sum to 199.
Personal foulsNo team figure. Players sum to 519.
Minutes (derived)200.0

30 of 30 games have player logs. Residual is team total minus sum of players. Team rebounds and team turnovers have no player owner, so a residual is expected. Definitions

StatisticStatusTeam Total, Logged GamesSum of PlayersResidualToleranceTeam Total, Games Without Logs
PointsReconciled2,3042,3040±11.50
Field goals madeReconciled8048040±4.00
Field goals attemptedReconciled1,7951,7950±9.00
3-pointers madeReconciled2662660±2.00
3-pointers attemptedReconciled7767760±3.90
Free throws madeReconciled4304300±2.10
Free throws attemptedReconciled6026020±3.00
Offensive reboundsNo player split
Defensive reboundsNo player split
Total reboundsResidual shown1,042947+95±83.40
AssistsReconciled4394390±2.20
BlocksReconciled89890±2.00
TurnoversResidual shown330318+12±9.90
StealsNo team figure199
Personal foulsNo team figure519
Minutes (derived)Reconciled6,1006,083+16.8±122.00

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
PlayerPoss. ShareNet and RangeβRange Graphic
Chandler Cuthrell70.7%+1.6range +0.6 to +2.5Sufficient evidence
Randall Pettus II68.4%-0.8range -1.6 to +0.2Sufficient evidence
Bryson Cokley68.0%-0.8range -2.0 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Isaac Harrell66.5%-1.3range -2.6 to -0.0Sufficient evidence
Ja'Juan Carr64.1%-0.8range -2.1 to +0.5Sufficient evidence
Kacper Klaczek50.3%+1.2range +0.5 to +2.4Sufficient evidence
Ned Hull43.7%+0.2range -0.7 to +1.4Sufficient evidence
DeMarco Johnson32.2%-0.2range -1.2 to +1.0Sufficient evidence
Caleb Middleton20.8%-0.4range -1.2 to +0.4Sufficient evidence
Bryson Spell12.1%-3.6range -4.5 to -2.7Limited evidence
Iker Garmendia3.3%Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions
+9.2range +8.4 to +10.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

10 valued players hold 99.3% of on-court time. 1 without a value (under 300 possessions) holds 0.7%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 2.4%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value