Arizona

B12 · 2025–26 · Raw net rank 5 · Raw net 23.4 · Tempo 71.4 · 39 Division I games · Through 2026-04-04

Record: 36–3; 36 wins
AdjNet: 30.3β; rank 3 of 365
AdjO: 122.9β; rank 7 of 365
AdjD: 92.6β; rank 3 of 365
AdjT: 70.7β
SOS: 11.0β; rank 8 of 363
NCSOS: 2.3β
WAB: 15.1β; rank 2 of 363
RR: 3.8β
Exp. W: 32.2β

Scouting Report

Scouting report with national ranks
Category	Offense	Defense	D-I Average
Efficiency
Efficiency / 100 poss.	120.312	96.96	108.5
Four Factors
Effective FG%	54.745	45.34	51.4
TO / 100 poss.	15.171	16.3200	16.7
Offensive rebound %	38.45	26.933	30.6
FTA / FGA %	43.911	27.125	35.0
Shooting
3P%	36.637	31.442	33.9
2P%	54.670	44.23	51.7
FT%	73.4157	71.8141	72.5
Style
3PA / FGA %	26.3	37.6	39.5
Assists / FGM %	53.9	50.3	52.6
Blocks / opp. 2PA %	10.8	8.5	9.5
Point Distribution
3-pointers %	20.4	32.2	31.4
2-pointers %	56.8	50.2	48.8
Free throws %	22.8	17.7	19.8

Best · Median · Worst · Mark: further right is a better national rank, of 365 teams.

Rotation Depth

Effective Rotation Size: 8.0
Top Three Share of Minutes: 45%
Bench Share of Minutes: 30%
Players with Logged Minutes: 14

Bench: players outside the top five in minutes. Definitions

Schedule and Results

Schedule and results
Date	Opponent	Result	Poss.	Site	Record
11-03	Florida	W 93–87	81.7	Neutral	1–0
11-07	Utah Tech	W 93–67	71.2	Home	2–0
11-11	Northern Ariz.	W 84–49	71.2	Home	3–0
11-14	UCLA	W 69–65	67.5	Neutral	4–0
11-19	UConn	W 71–67	63.2	Away	5–0
11-24	Denver	W 103–73	75.5	Home	6–0
11-29	Norfolk St.	W 98–61	75.6	Home	7–0
12-06	Auburn	W 97–68	74.3	Home	8–0
12-13	Alabama	W 96–75	76.0	Neutral	9–0
12-16	Abilene Christian	W 96–62	74.0	Home	10–0
12-20	San Diego St.	W 68–45	62.9	Neutral	11–0
12-22	Bethune-Cookman	W 107–71	79.1	Home	12–0
12-29	South Dakota St.	W 99–71	77.9	Home	13–0
01-03	Utah	W 97–78	75.8	Away	14–0
01-07	Kansas St.	W 101–76	82.3	Home	15–0
01-10	TCU	W 86–73	74.3	Away	16–0
01-14	Arizona St.	W 89–82	70.3	Home	17–0
01-17	UCF	W 84–77	74.7	Away	18–0
01-21	Cincinnati	W 77–51	65.0	Home	19–0
01-24	West Virginia	W 88–53	67.9	Home	20–0
01-26	BYU	W 86–83	75.6	Away	21–0
01-31	Arizona St.	W 87–74	73.9	Away	22–0
02-07	Oklahoma St.	W 84–47	74.9	Home	23–0
02-09	Kansas	L 78–82	74.3	Away	23–1
02-14	Texas Tech	L 75–78 1OT	70.4	Home	23–2
02-18	BYU	W 75–68	66.2	Home	24–2
02-21	Houston	W 73–66	64.6	Away	25–2
02-24	Baylor	W 87–80	65.4	Away	26–2
02-28	Kansas	W 84–61	69.2	Home	27–2
03-02	Iowa St.	W 73–57	66.8	Home	28–2
03-07	Colorado	W 89–79	72.7	Away	29–2
03-12	UCF	W 81–59	68.4	Neutral	30–2
03-13	Iowa St.	W 82–80	66.2	Neutral	31–2
03-14	Houston	W 79–74	65.7	Neutral	32–2
03-20	LIU	W 92–58	70.7	—	33–2
03-22	Utah St.	W 78–66	64.4	—	34–2
03-26	Arkansas	W 109–88	79.9	—	35–2
03-28	Purdue	W 79–64	65.3	—	36–2
04-04	Michigan	L 73–91	78.0	—	36–3

Roster · 14 players

Player logs in 38 of 39 team games

Team roster, season totals
Column groups	Minutes			Season Totals							Shooting									Last Five Team Games
Player	G	MPG	Team Min%	Pts	Reb	Ast	Stl	Blk	TO	PF	2P	2P%	3P	3P%	FT	FT%	eFG%	TS%	FTA/FGA	G	MPG	Min%	Pts/G
Jaden Bradley	38	30:53	75.0%	508	126	166	53	4	67	78	144–299	48.2%	26–66	39.4%	142–178	79.8%	50.1%	57.3%	48.8%	5	31:48 +0:55	79.5%	13.2 −0.2
Brayden Burries	38	29:56	72.7%	606	189	93	57	8	55	80	132–241	54.8%	69–176	39.2%	135–167	80.8%	56.5%	61.8%	40.0%	5	31:31 +1:36	78.8%	16.8 +0.9
Ivan Kharchenkov	38	28:35	69.4%	395	163	89	53	11	57	58	115–198	58.1%	32–103	31.1%	69–95	72.6%	54.2%	57.6%	31.6%	5	32:39 +4:04	81.6%	12.4 +2.0
Motiejus Krivas	38	25:44	62.5%	392	316	42	25	72	52	102	128–222	57.7%	4–13	30.8%†	124–160	77.5%	57.0%	64.2%	68.1%	5	27:47 +2:04	69.5%	10.2 −0.1
Koa Peat	35	27:52	62.3%	498	198	90	22	25	55	77	190–354	53.7%	7–20	35.0%†	97–156	62.2%	53.6%	56.3%	41.7%	5	31:08 +3:16	77.9%	17.2 +3.0
Anthony Dell'Orso	38	20:49	50.6%	323	76	70	31	6	39	46	61–126	48.4%	49–145	33.8%	54–65	83.1%	49.6%	53.9%	24.0%	5	16:01 −4:49	40.0%	5.0 −3.5
Tobe Awaka	38	20:46	50.4%	352	346	28	14	24	38	103	123–206	59.7%	5–12	41.7%†	91–143	63.6%	59.9%	62.7%	65.6%	5	16:39 −4:06	41.6%	8.2 −1.1
Dwayne Aristode	34	12:55	28.1%	128	59	24	15	3	12	25	17–31	54.8%†	28–62	45.2%	10–20	50.0%†	63.4%†	62.9%†	21.5%†	5	6:55 −6:00	17.3%	2.0 −1.8
Evan NelsonUnder 100 minutes	24	3:06	4.7%	11	11	6	3	1	6	2	1–3	33.3%†	3–9	33.3%†	0–0	—	45.8%†	45.8%†	0.0%†	3	1:28 −1:37	2.2%	0.0 −0.5
Sidi GueyeUnder 100 minutes	25	2:55	4.7%	29	18	5	1	5	5	11	11–16	68.8%†	0–0	—	7–10	70.0%†	68.8%†	71.1%†	62.5%†	2	3:18 +0:23	3.3%	2.0 +0.8
Addison ArnoldUnder 100 minutes	19	1:48	2.2%	8	9	4	0	1	2	7	2–11	18.2%†	0–1	0.0%†	4–4	100.0%†	16.7%†	29.1%†	33.3%†	2	1:53 +0:05	1.9%	1.0 +0.6
Sven DjopmoUnder 100 minutes	18	1:23	1.6%	10	3	4	1	0	1	3	4–5	80.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	2–5	40.0%†	57.1%†	54.3%†	71.4%†	2	1:24 +0:01	1.4%	0.0 −0.6
Jackson CookFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	1:10	0.7%	0	2	0	0	0	0	2	0–1	0.0%†	0–2	0.0%†	0–1	0.0%†	0.0%†	0.0%†	33.3%†	2	0:43 −0:27	0.7%	0.0 0.0
Jackson FrancoisFew gamesUnder 100 minutes	9	1:09	0.7%	4	4	0	0	0	2	6	2–3	66.7%†	0–0	—	0–0	—	66.7%†	66.7%†	0.0%†	2	0:43 −0:26	0.7%	0.0 −0.4
Team, games with logs · season totals	38 games			3264	1625	620	not published	161	402	not published	930–1716	54.2%	223–611	36.5%	735–1004	73.2%	54.3%	58.9%	43.1%
Sum of players				3264	1520	621	275	160	391	600	Shooting residuals: see Player Lines Against Team Totals.
Residual: team minus players				0	+105	−1	not published	+1	+11	not published

G: logged games. Team Min%: share of team minutes on court (40 per game plus overtime). 2P, 3P and FT show made–attempted. † Few attempts: under 100 FGA, 50 3PA or 25 FTA. Few G: under 10 games. <100 min: under 100 minutes. Last Five Team Games columns show change from the season value and hide on narrow screens.

Speculative Compensation · 2025–26β

Estimated share of the school's revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball. Not observed pay.

Team Pool: $3.55M; 80% Range $2.60M to $5.00M
Tier: Power 4; medium evidence
Team Pool, Scenarios Z1 to Z4: $3.55M in all four; Scenario medians
Players with Figures: 14; 6 floor only

Players in possession-share order
Player	Poss. Share	Speculative Best Guess	80% Range	Median % of Team Pool	Scenarios Z1 to Z4	Floor Part	Evidence and Flags
Jaden Bradley	76.5%	$650K	$450K to $975K	17.9%	$650K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Brayden Burries	75.1%	$585K	$390K to $885K	16.1%	$585K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Ivan Kharchenkov	70.9%	$395K	$220K to $610K	11.6%	$395K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Koa Peat	64.8%	$450K	$275K to $680K	12.7%	$450K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Motiejus Krivas	63.9%	$610K	$410K to $965K	16.6%	$610K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Anthony Dell'Orso	52.0%	$265K	$125K to $415K	7.7%	$265K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Tobe Awaka	51.8%	$235K	$105K to $380K	7.0%	$235K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Dwayne Aristode	29.8%	$170K	$83K to $270K	5.0%	$170K in all four	$25K	Sufficient evidence
Sidi Gueye	5.0%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Evan Nelson	5.0%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Addison Arnold	2.3%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Sven Djopmo	1.7%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jackson Francois	0.7%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Jackson Cook	0.7%	$25K	$14K to $40K	0.7%	$25K in all four	$25K	Floor only: below 300 possessions, no value estimate
Team Pool	—	$3.55M	$2.60M to $5.00M	100%	$3.55M in all four	—

What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ

Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.

School Finances · School-Reported (EADA)

Self-reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Expenses cover coaching, travel, aid and operations, not player pay.

School-reported finances, 2024-25, University of Arizona (NCAA Division I-FBS)
Measure	School-Reported Amount	Note
Men's basketball revenue	$22,635,363	Equals expenses (budget identity)
Men's basketball expenses	$22,635,363
Athletics department expenses	$132,661,899
Athletics department revenue	$132,661,899

Team Totalsβ

Season totals, 39 games, 2,793 possessions. Observed box-score sums, unadjusted. Definitions

Team and opponent season totals
Statistic	Team	Opponents
Points	3,360	2,706
Field goals made	1,183	969
Field goals attempted	2,372	2,458
3-pointers made	229	290
3-pointers attempted	625	923
Free throws made	765	478
Free throws attempted	1,042	666
Offensive rebounds	506	426
Defensive rebounds	1,157	813
Total rebounds	1,663	1,239
Assists	638	487
Blocks	166	148
Turnovers	421	455
Steals	No team figure. Players sum to 275.
Personal fouls	No team figure. Players sum to 600.
Minutes (derived)	7,825	not published

Model-Implied Player Valueβ

Ranges are the 10th to 90th percentile of whole-game resampling draws. They are not calibrated intervals.

Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Line: zero. No graphic: insufficient evidence.

Net points per 100 possessions, in possession-share order.
Player	Poss. Share	Net and Rangeβ
Jaden Bradley	76.5%	+6.8range +5.6 to +7.8Sufficient evidence
Brayden Burries	75.1%	+6.2range +4.8 to +7.4Sufficient evidence
Ivan Kharchenkov	70.9%	+4.4range +2.9 to +5.7Sufficient evidence
Koa Peat	64.8%	+5.5range +4.0 to +6.8Sufficient evidence
Motiejus Krivas	63.9%	+7.4range +6.1 to +9.1Sufficient evidence
Anthony Dell'Orso	52.0%	+3.5range +2.3 to +5.0Sufficient evidence
Tobe Awaka	51.8%	+3.1range +1.8 to +4.4Sufficient evidence
Dwayne Aristode	29.8%	+3.8range +2.1 to +5.5Sufficient evidence
Sidi Gueye	5.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Evan Nelson	5.0%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Addison Arnold	2.3%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Sven Djopmo	1.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jackson Francois	0.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence
Jackson Cook	0.7%	Fewer than 300 on-court possessions; no value is estimated. Insufficient evidence

Team Aggregate of Player Values, 2026β

Summary of the player values below. Split role: descriptive: not used in fit or gates. Model nil-value-v3. Definitions · NIL Methodology

Average value over five on-court slots, net points per 100 possessions: +14.4range +13.4 to +15.1Sufficient evidence

200 joint draws. The range is the 10th to 90th percentile. Player ranges cannot be added.

8 valued players hold 96.9% of on-court time. 6 without a value (under 300 possessions) hold 3.1%, counted at replacement level -9.5. Limited-evidence players hold 0.0%.

NIL Methodology · Scheduling and Model-Implied Value